Management and outcomes of hidden penis in children

Alireza - Mirshemirani, Ahmad Khaleghnejad Tabari, Mohsen Rouzrokh, Javad Ghoroubi, Leily Mohajerzadeh, Saran Lotfollahzadeh

Abstract


75

Objective:Hidden penis may have different categories: Concealed, trapped, and buried types. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results and outcomes of repaired cases.

Material &Methods: Totally 40patients (5months -12years old)were surgically repaired due to different types of hidden penis from April 2010toDecember 2015 in our hospital. Multiple surgical procedures were performed for each type. Data were collected and evaluated for number of patient’s type of anomalies, surgical techniques, outcome and follow-up.

Results: All forty cases underwent surgical repair, of which all concealed and buried patients had penile degloving and penile fixation, that all reported improved in function, and good in outcome.

Conclusions: Patients with hidden penis are in psychological risks. The aim of hidden penis is to restore an aesthetic and functional penis.


Full Text:

PDF

50

References


-Keyes EL. Phymosis-Paraphimosis-Tumors of the penis. (1919), Appleton &Co, New York, USA.

-Bilommi R. Hidden penis in children: Evaluation of outcomes and review of literature. Med Surg Urol 2015,4:4.http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2168-9857:1000156.

-Crawford BS.Buried penis.Br J Plast Surg 1977; 30:96-9.

-Maizels M, Zaontz M, Donovan J.et al. surgical correction of the buried penis:description of a classification system and a technique to correct the disorders. J Urol 1986; 136:268-71.

-Chan LH, Wong KK. Common urological problems in children: prepuce, phymosis, and buried penis. Hong Kong Med J. June 2016; 22(3).

-Keyes EL. phymosis-paraphimosis-tumors of the penis. Appleton & Co.1919.

-Jung EH, Son JH, LEE JW. Simple anchoring of the penopubic skin to the prepubic deep fascia in surgical correction of buried penis. Korean Journal of Urology.2011.52:787-791.

-Kojovic V, Bizic M, Majstorovic M, Korac G, Stanojevic D, et al. Genital skin flaps for reconstruction of iatrogenic trapped penis. Eur Urol Meetings.2008, 3, 80.

- Provic S, Djordjevic M, Kekic Z, Djakovic N. Penile surgery and reconstruction. Curr Opin Urol.2002. 12:191-194.

- Rivas S, Romero R, Parente A, Fanjul M, Angulo JM. Simplification of the surgical treatment of a hidden penis. Actas UrologicasEspanolas.2011.35:310-314.

- Sadler TW: Longman’s Medical Embryology. 6th edn. Chapt 15. New York: William and Wilkins, 283-286.1990.

–Campbell, M.: Embryology and anomalies of the urogenital tract. In: Clinical Pediatric Urology.Philadelphia:W.B.Saunders Co. Chap. 3, P.273, 1951.

–Maizels M, Zaontz M, Donovan J, Bushnick PN.et al. Surgical correction of the buried penis: description of a classification system and a technique to correct the disorder. J Urol, 1986, 136:268.

–Horton CE, Verstman B, Teasley D. Hidden penis release: adjunctive suprapubic lipectomy. Ann Plast Surg. 2001.19:131.

–Donahoe PK, Keating MA. Preputial unfurling to correct the buried pens’ Ped Surg.1986.21:1055.

– Mohamed A. Abdel Aziz, Samir H Gouda, Sayed H. Abdalla. Et al. Management of concealed penis in children. AAMJ. April 2008.Vol.6, N.2.

– Boonjindasup A, Pinsky M, Smith W, et al. Management of concealed penis using meshed split-thickness skin grafting in an adult population. The Journal of Urolog. Supplement Monday .May 6.2013. vol.189.N0.4s.

– Chan IHY, Wong KY. Common urological problems in children: prepuce, phymosis, and buried penis. Hong Kong Med Journal. June 2016.Vol.22, No.3.

– Igbokwe MC, Faye ST, Ndoye M,Jalloh M.et al. Concealed penis and urinary retention in a child with severe phymosis: A case report. Uro Andro- Vol 1, No, 6 Juillet 2016.

– Thorup j, thorup SC,Ifaoui IB. Complication rate after circumcision in a paediatric surgical setting should not be neglected. Danish Medical Journal. 2013, 60 (8): A 4681.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22037/irjps.v3i2.17570

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.