Measuring Subjective Happiness by Newly Developed Scale in Tehran, Iran
Novelty in Biomedicine,
Vol. 3 No. 4 (2015),
28 October 2015
Background: Happiness as one of the main positive health indicators has drawn more attention in recent years among policy makers and health system managers. There are few studies performed to measure happiness in population-based settings in Iran. In response to this need, our study tends to assess Iranians subjective happiness in Tehran, Capital city of Iran.
Materials and Methods: Present study was conducted in Tehran, Capital of Iran, with more than 7 Million populations in January 2013, using a two-step approach. In first step c conceptual framework of Iranians’ happiness was developed. In the second phase of study, a survey recruiting 700 participants was conducted. Stratified cluster sampling method was employed. Participants were recruited from all the 22 municipal divisions of Tehran as strata, proportional to the population size and its gender and age distribution. Happiness was measure by a 40-item questionnaire with scores ranged among 40 to 200.
Results: Conceptual framework of Iranians’ happiness based on reviewed documents and consensus building process was the product of first step. At second step, from a pool of 700 persons, 696 (97%) agreed to participate and filled out the questionnaire completely. The mean of happiness score was 143.9 (95% confidence interval, 142.5 to 145.4). The results show that the happiness score of jobless people (135.1, 95%CI: 128.1-142.0) and widowed singles (126.6, 95%CI: 113.0-140.2) were significantly lower than other corresponding groups. There was no significant association between gender, age group, educational level as determinants and happiness.
Conclusion: Happiness level of Tehranians is somewhat higher than the moderate level. This finding is consistent with findings of other conducted studies in country. However, it is not consistent with some of international reports of happiness, For instance, Happy Planet Index. Due to inadequate information, it is necessary to conduct more research to measure subjective happiness and its determinants, specially, in a nation-wide approach.
- subjective happiness
How to Cite
Diener E. Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist. 2000;55(1):34-43.
Haller M, Hadler M. How Social Relations and Structures can Produce Happiness and Unhappiness: An International Comparative Analysis. Social Indicators Research. 2006;75(2):169-216.
Ballas D, Dorling D. Measuring the impact of major life events upon happiness. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2007;36(6):1244-52.
Dan H, Moore M, Schmitz H. Country classifications for a changing world." IDS Working Papers. 2009;326:1-48.
Stiglitz, J, Sen A, Fitoussi JP. The measurement of economic performance and social progress revisited. Reflections and overview 2009;. Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Paris.
Lindert J, Bain PA, Kubzansky LD, Stein C. Well-being measurement and the WHO health policy Health 2010: systematic review of measurement scales. The European Journal of Public Health. 2015;193.
Dodge R. The challenge of defining wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing. 2012;2-3.
Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford university press. 2014.
Ryan RM, Edward LD. On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual review of psychology. 2001;52(1):141-66.
Blanchflower DG, Andrew JO. International happiness: A new view on the measure of performance.The Academy of Management Perspectives. 2011;25(1):6-22.
Ott JC. Government and happiness in 130 nations: good governance fosters higher level and more equality of happiness. Social Indicators Research. 2011;102:3-22.
Montazeri A, Omidvari S, Azin A, Aeenparast A, Jahangiri K, Sadighi J, Ebadi M, et al. Happiness among Iranians: findings from the Iranian Health Perception Survey (IHPS). Payesh, Journal of the Iranian Institute For Health Sciences Research. 2012;11(4):467-75.
Bagheri F, Akbarizadeh F, Hatami H. The relationship between nurses’ spiritual intelligence and happiness in Iran. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010;5:1556-61.
Liaghatdar MJ. Reliability and validity of the Oxford Happiness Inventory among university students in Iran. The Spanish journal of psychology. 2008;11(1):310-3.
Alavi HR. Correlatives of happiness in the university students of Iran (a religious approach). Journal of Religion and Health. 2007;46(4):480-99.
Bagheri F, Akbarizadeh F, Hatami H. "The relationship between spiritual intelligence and happiness on the nurse staffs of the Fatemeh Zahra hospital and Bentolhoda Institute of Boushehr City." ISMJ 2011; 14 (4): 256-263.
Tenaglia, Simona. Testing theories on happiness: a questionnaire. working paper, University of Tor Vergata–Roma. 2007.
Seligman, Martin EP. Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Simon and Schuster., 2012.
Saamah A. The happy planet index: 2012 report. A global index of sustainable well-being, The New Economics Foun-dation, London, UK; 2012.
Kalmijn WML. Arends R, Ruut V. Happiness scale interval study. Methodological considerations. Social Indicators Research. 2011;102(3):497-515.
Helliwell F, Layard R, Sachs J. World happiness report 2013. Earth Institute, Columbia University. 2014.
- Abstract Viewed: 615 times
- PDF Downloaded: 684 times