Comparison Between Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway and Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal of Cellular & Molecular Anesthesia,
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022),
12 March 2022
,
Page 49-57
https://doi.org/10.22037/jcma.v7i1.35016
Abstract
Introduction: Supraglottic airway devices (SADs) offer an alternative airway with improved airway seal enable the use of higher airway pressures during positive pressure ventilation (PPV). We compared the safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) Proseal and LMA Supreme in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Materials and Methods: Eighty patients, 18-60 years, ASA grade 1 & 2 were randomly allocated into two groups of 40 each. After induction of anesthesia, LMA Supreme or LMA Proseal of appropriate size was then inserted randomly. Parameters like the ease of LMA insertion; ease of OGT insertion; oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP); hemodynamics; adequacy of ventilation were recorded. Complications, if any, were also recorded.
Results: LMA Supreme was easier to insert than LMA Proseal. Gastric tube insertion was comparatively easier in LMA Supreme than LMA Proseal. The mean oropharyngeal leak pressure was higher with LMA Proseal (31.98 ± 2.49cmH2O) than with LMA Supreme (30.23 ± 3.65 cmH2O). Peak airway pressures were comparable for the two groups. There was comparatively more airway trauma (mucosal injury, sore throat) in LMA Proseal than LMA Supreme.
Conclusion: A higher oropharyngeal leak pressure makes LMA Proseal a better choice than LMA Supreme in procedures with raised intragastric pressure.
- Laryngeal Mask Airway, Proseal, Supreme, oropharyngeal leak pressure
How to Cite
References
2. Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The Proseal laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anesth 2005; 52:739-60
3. Blunt MC, Bruchette. Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and disposable anaesthetic equipment balancing the risks. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90:1-3.
4. LMA Supreme. A second generation SAD with an innovative Second Seal. Available from: http://www.teleflex.com/emea/documentLibrary/documents/940689-000001_31817-LMA-TF-Supreme-A4_1403_PDF.pdf [Accessed April2016].
5. Belena JM, Gracia JL, Ayala JL, Núñez M, Lorenzo JA, de los Reyes A et al. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme for positive pressure ventilation using laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Clin Anesth 2011; 23:456-60.
6. Anand LK, Goel N, Singh M, Kapoor D. Comparison of the Supreme and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiologica Taiwanica. 2016 Jun 1;54(2):44-50.
7. Gill RK, Tarat A, Pathak D, Dutta S. Comparative study of two laryngeal mask airways: Proseal laryngeal mask airway and supreme laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed adults undergoing elective surgery. Anesth Essays Res 2017;11:23-7.
8. Lopez AM, Valero R, Hurtado P, Gambus P, Pons M, Anglada T. Comparison of LMA Supreme with LMA Proseal for airway management in patients anaesthetized in prone position. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107:265-71.
9. Roberts M, Mani M, Wilker A, Flavell E, Goodwin N. A randomized crossover study comparing the disposable laryngeal mask airway Supreme with the laryngeal mask airway Proseal in unparalysed anaesthetized patients. The Internet Journal of Anaesthesiol 2012; 30:available at http://ispub.com/IJA/30/2/14011.
10. Tham HM, Tan SM, Woon KL, Zhao YD. A comparison of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed adult patients: a randomized crossover study. Can J Anaesth 2010;57:672 e8.
11. Keller C, Brimacombe JR, Keller K, Morris R. Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth 1999;82:286‑7.
12. Singh A, Bhalotra AR, Anand R. A comparative evaluation of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, I-gel and Supreme laryngeal mask airway in adult patients undergoing elective surgery: A randomised trial. Indian J Anaesth 2018;62:858-64
13. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The Proseal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anaesthetized patients. Anaesthesiology 2000; 93:104-9.
14. Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M, Keller C. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme – A single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross‑over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia 2009;64:79‑83.
15. Belena JM, Nunez M, Anta D, Carnero M, Gracia JL, Ayala JL et al. Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2013; 30:119-23
16. Belena JM, Nunenz M, Gasco C, Vidal A, Alcojor A. Use of supraglottic devices with drainage channel in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized comparison of LMA Proseal, LMA Supreme and I-gel. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2014; 31:281.
17. Seet E, Rajeev S, Firoz T, Yousaf F, Wong J, Wong DT, et al. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010 ;27:602-7.
18. Lee AK, Tey JB, Lim Y, Sia AT. Comparison of the single‑use LMA supreme with the reusable ProSeal LMA for anaesthesia in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009;37:815‑9.
19. Verghese C, Ramaswamy B. LMA Supreme : a new single-use LMA with gastric access: a report on its clinical efficacy. Br J Anaesth 2008;101:405-10.
20. Hosten T, Yildiz TS, Kus A, Solak M, Toker K. Comparison of supreme laryngeal mask airway and ProSeal laryngeal mask airway during cholecystectomy. Balkan Med J 2012;29:314‑9.
21. Timmermann A, Cremer S, Eich C, Kazmaier S, Bräuer A, Graf BM et al. Prospective clinical and fiberoptic evaluation of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesiology 2009; 110:262-5.
- Abstract Viewed: 114 times
- PDF Downloaded: 140 times