A Comparative Study of Immediate and Delayed Supine Position on Hemodynamic Changes of Patients Undergoing Hemorrhoid and Fischer Surgery under Spinal Anesthesia
Iranian Journal of Emergency Medicine,
Vol. 9 No. 1 (2022),
16 March 2022
,
Page e37
https://doi.org/10.22037/ijem.v9i1.39921
Abstract
Introduction: Spinal anesthesia is generally used for surgeries related to the lower abdomen, perineum, and lower limbs. The purpose of this study is to compare immediate and delayed supine positions on the hemodynamic changes of patients undergoing hemorrhoid and Fischer surgeries under spinal anesthesia.
Methods: The present study is a case-control study that was conducted on 60 patients who were candidates for hemorrhoid and fissure surgery in Motahari Hospital of Jahrom city by a specific surgeon. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups of 30 people in the immediate and delayed supine positions. After the spinal anesthesia, the patients in the delayed supine position group were kept in a sitting position for 3-5 minutes and then assumed the surgical position. In the immediate supine position group, the patients were placed in the supine position after receiving spinal anesthesia and were ready for surgery. Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, respiration, arterial oxygen saturation, and pulse of the patient were measured and recorded before and immediately after the position and at 10, 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after the position. Data analysis was done using descriptive and inferential statistics tests at a significance level of P<0.05.
Results: The study groups were similar in terms of age and body mass index variables. The mean trend of systolic and diastolic blood pressure in the immediate supine position and delayed supine position groups showed a significant difference from the time before spinal anesthesia to 90 minutes after the operation (P<0.001). The trend of mean MAP and heart rate in the immediate supine position and delayed supine position groups showed a significant difference from the time before spinal anesthesia to 90 minutes after the operation (P<0.001). The amount of ephedrine consumed in the delayed supine position group (10%) was significantly lower than in the immediate supine position group (50%) (P=0.003).
Conclusion: The present study has indicated that the use of a delayed supine position can significantly reduce the number of hemodynamic changes over time compared to the immediate supine position and minimize the amount of ephedrine used to compensate for pressure drop.
- Immediate supine position
- Delayed supine position
- Hemorrhoids
- Fisher
- Spinal anesthesia
How to Cite
References
Miller R, Eriksson I, Flesisher L. Miller’s Anesthesia 7th edition, Chapter 34, Preoperative Evaluation. Churhcill Living· stone/Elsevier. 2010;1002.
Brown DL. Spinal, epidural, and caudal anesthesia. Miller's anesthesia. 2010:1611-38.
Covino BG, Scott DB, Lambert DH. Handbook of spinal anaesthesia and analgesia: Saunders; 1994.
Favarel-Garrigues J, Sztark F, Petitjean M, Thicoipe M, Lassie P, Dabadie P. Hemodynamic effects of spinal anesthesia in the elderly: single dose versus titration through a catheter. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1996;82(2):312-6.
Hartmann B, Junger A, Klasen J, Benson M, Jost A, Banzhaf A, et al. The incidence and risk factors for hypotension after spinal anesthesia induction: an analysis with automated data collection. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2002;94(6):1521-9.
Rooke GA, Freund PR, Jacobson AF. Hemodynamic response and change in organ blood volume during spinal anesthesia in elderly men with cardiac disease. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1997;85(1):99-105.
Miller RD, Eriksson LI, Fleisher LA, Wiener-Kronish JP, Young WL. Miller's anesthesia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone Philadelphia; 2005.
Bhattacharyya S, Bisai S, Biswas H, Tiwary MK, Mallik S, Saha SM. Regional anesthesia in transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) surgery: A comparative study between saddle block and subarachnoid block. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia. 2015;9(3):268.
Miller R. Anesthesia 5th ed Churchill Livingstone. Anaesthetic Implication of Concurrent Diseases, Disorders of Respiratory and Immune System. 2000;25:1190.
Bjørnestad E, Rosseland LA. Anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening: Tidsskrift for Praktisk Medicin, ny Raekke. 2010;130(7):748-51.
Cyna AM, Andrew M, Emmett RS, Middleton P, Simmons SW. Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2006(4).
Mercier F, Bonnet M-P, De la Dorie A, Moufouki M, Banu F, Hanaf A, et al., editors. Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: fluid loading, vasopressors and hypotension. Annales Francaises D'anesthesie et de Reanimation; 2007.
Secher N, Arnsbo P, Andersen LH, Thomsen A. Measurements of cardiac stroke volume in various body positions in pregnancy and during Caesarean section: a comparison between thermodilution and impedance cardiography. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation. 1979;39(6):569-76.
Barclay DL, Renegar O, Nelson Jr EW. The influence of inferior vena cava compression on the level of spinal anesthesia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1968;101(6):792-800.
Povey H, Olsen PA, Pihl H. Spinal analgesia with hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine: effects of different patient positions. Acta anaesthesiologica scandinavica. 1987;31(7):616-9.
Hirabayashi Y, Shimizu R, Saitoh K, Fukuda H, Igarashi T. Acid-base state of cerebrospinal fluid during pregnancy and its effect on spread of spinal anaesthesia. British journal of anaesthesia. 1996;77(3):352-5.
Blumgart C, Ryall D, Dennison B, Thompson-Hill L. Mechanism of extension of spinal anaesthesia by extradural injection of local anaesthetic. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 1992;69(5):457-60.
Takiguchi T, Okano T, Egawa H, Okubo Y, Saito K, Kitajima T. The effect of epidural saline injection on analgesic level during combined spinal and epidural anesthesia assessed clinically and myelographically. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1997;85(5):1097-100.
Yun EM, Marx GF, Santos AC. The effects of maternal position during induction of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1998;87(3):614-8.
Russell I. Regional anaesthesia for operative delivery. Regional Analgesia in Obstetrics: Springer; 2000. p. 255-69.
Elhalim Moustafa KsA, Salama HG, Anis SG, Elrazik RAEA. Effects of Delayed Supine Positioning after Induction of Subarachnoid Block on Post-spinal Hemodynamic Changes Compared to Traditional Subarachnoid Block: prospective observational randomized controlled dose response clinical study. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine. 2021;114(Supplement_1):hcab086. 46.
Køhler F, Sørensen J, Helbo‐Hansen H. Effect of delayed supine positioning after induction of spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2002;46(4):441-6.
Rout C, Rocke D, Levin J, Gouws E, Reddy D. A reevaluation of the role of crystalloid preload in the prevention of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. 1993;79(2):262-9.
Jeon Y-T, Hwang J-W, Kim M-H, Oh A-Y, Park KH, Park H-P, et al. Positional blood pressure change and the risk of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: an observational study. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2010;111(3):712-5.
Sargin A, Karaman S, Turksal E, Karaosmanoglu K, Yasar A, Askar F. Abstract PR200: Effects of Sitting Up for Three Minutes Or One Minute Versus Immediately Lying Down After Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2016;123(3S):258.
- Abstract Viewed: 159 times
- pdf (فارسی) Downloaded: 132 times
