Validation of Human Infection with 2019 Novel Coronavirus(covid-2019) Case Report Form of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Iranian Journal of Emergency Medicine,
Vol. 9 No. 1 (2022),
16 March 2022
,
Page e32
https://doi.org/10.22037/ijem.v9i1.39676
Abstract
Introduction: Due to the prevalence of new coronavirus in the world and Iran, access to reliable information about patients and the trend of disease outbreaks are necessary to control the disease at the community level, which is important by using systems Regular registration of patient information in the form of a register will be possible. In the present study, the translation and validation of the case registration form of patients with the new coronavirus (COVID-19) provided by the World Center for Disease Control and Prevention were performed.
Methods: In the present study, which is a study on the development of the executive scientific system, after translating the case registration form of patients with new coronavirus (COVID-19) to evaluate its reliability in a sample of 24 patients with new coronavirus methods Cronbach's alpha, Richardson's code and paired and individual correlation test were used. CVI and CVR determination was used to determine the content validity of the patient registration form based on the opinion of the panel of experts.
Results: In the present study, the information of 24 patients admitted to the coronary ward of Peymanieh Hospital in Jahrom was recorded using the case registration form of patients with new coronavirus. In multiple-choice questions, Cronbach's alpha was higher than 0.7 and 0.735, which was appropriate. Correlation coefficients also showed high and proportional values. Richardson's Koder test also confirmed the reliability with a statistic of 0.718. All questions were in good validity according to the panel of experts, except for 4 questions that had a CVR of 0.2 and were removed according to the experts. The overall CVI was calculated to be 0.828, which is acceptable and appropriate.
Conclusion: In the present study, a localized form of case registration of new coronavirus patients was presented, which can help to create coherence in the patient information registration system.
- New Coronavirus
- Covid 19
- Control
- Prevention
How to Cite
References
Hu B, Guo H, Zhou P, Shi ZL. Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2021 Mar;19(3):141-54.
Singhal T. A review of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) The indian journal of pediatrics. 2020; 87 (4): 281–286. Apr.[Europe PMC free article][Abstract][Google Scholar].
Wiersinga WJ, Rhodes A, Cheng AC, Peacock SJ, Prescott HC. Pathophysiology, transmission, diagnosis, and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a review. Jama. 2020 Aug 25;324(8):782-93.
Jiang F, Deng L, Zhang L, Cai Y, Cheung CW, Xia Z. Review of the clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Journal of general internal medicine. 2020 May;35(5):1545-9.
Wang L, Wang Y, Ye D, Liu Q. Review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) based on current evidence. International journal of antimicrobial agents. 2020 Jun 1;55(6):105948.
Fang Z, Yi F, Wu K, Lai K, Sun X, Zhong N, Liu Z. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): an updated systematic review. MedRxiv. 2020 Jan 1.
Bellgard MI, Render L, Radochonski M, Hunter A. Second generation registry framework. Source code for biology and medicine. 2014 Dec;9(1):1-6.
Uribarri A, Núñez-Gil IJ, Aparisi A, Becerra-Muñoz VM, Feltes G, Trabattoni D, Fernández-Rozas I, Viana-Llamas MC, Pepe M, Cerrato E, Capel-Astrua T. Impact of renal function on admission in COVID-19 patients: an analysis of the international HOPE COVID-19 (Health Outcome Predictive Evaluation for COVID 19) Registry. Journal of nephrology. 2020 Aug;33(4):737-45.
Lindörfer D, Mansmann U. A comprehensive assessment tool for patient registry software systems: the CIPROS checklist. Methods of Information in Medicine. 2015;54(05):447-54.
Schmidt M, Schmidt SA, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT. The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clinical epidemiology. 2015;7:449.
Nelson EC, Eftimovska E, Lind C, Hager A, Wasson JH, Lindblad S. Patient reported outcome measures in practice. Bmj. 2015 Feb 10;350.
Sacchi L, Lanzola G, Viani N, Quaglini S. Personalization and patient involvement in decision support systems: current trends. Yearbook of medical informatics. 2015;24(01):106-18.
Somanath M, Nair A, Mohanty R, Barick U, Gowda A, Patil A. Good practices in the conduct of a patient registry. Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2016 Jan 1;5(4):22-6.
Fraser H, Biondich P, Moodley D, Choi S, Mamlin B, Szolovits P. Implementing electronic medical record systems in developing countries. Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics. 2005;13(2):83-95.
- Abstract Viewed: 86 times
- pdf (فارسی) Downloaded: 75 times
