Challenges of Fetal Rights under Economic Hardship: A Qualitative Study from Iran
Bioethics and Health Law Journal (BHL),
Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025),
22 Esfand 2026
https://doi.org/10.22037/bhl.v5i5.51404
Abstract
While fetal rights are gaining momentum in global health, ethics and legal discourses, they are still below par in socioeconomic policy frameworks. Access to prenatal services and family decision-making in Iran faces increased challenges due to both current international economic sanctions and recently introduced pronatalist population policies that have intersected with long-standing structural economic hardships. This study investigates the challenges concerning fetal rights in the context of Iranian families' economic difficulties. The focused qualitative analysis was derived from the broader mixed-methods research titled “Policy Analysis for Developing a Charter of Fetal Rights in Iran”. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 25 participants (5 parents, 6 healthcare providers, 4 legal experts, 4 religious scholars and 6 policy specialists). Key informants such as legal experts, theologians and policymakers were recruited using purposive sampling to ensure diversity of professional perspectives, while snowball sampling was applied primarily for parents due to accessibility challenges. Recruitment continued until data saturation was reached. Data analysis was performed using the conventional content analysis method by Zhang and Wildemuth in eight stages, supported by the MAXQDA software (version 2020). Content analysis revealed that the central theme was “Fetal Rights in the Context of Economic Hardship”, which encompassed four interrelated subcategories: 1. Financial barriers to accessing specialized prenatal screening services under limited insurance coverage; 2. Occupational insecurity and informal employment conditions during pregnancy; 3. Anticipatory economic anxiety regarding long-term childrearing expenses under unstable economic conditions; 4. Insufficient institutional welfare mechanisms and fragmented family-based support systems. The factors of economic vulnerability were found to be one of the structural determinants affecting maternal well-being and fetal health outcomes. Economic hardship and insufficient structural support indirectly affect maternal physical and mental health, thereby constraining the realization of fetal rights. Economic safety nets should therefore be incorporated into maternal and fetal health policies, including expanded insurance coverage for prenatal diagnostic services and targeted financial and nutritional programs for economically disadvantaged pregnant women.
- Fetal Rights
- Socioeconomic Factors
- Prenatal Care
- Maternal Health
- Government Support
- Economic Challenges
How to Cite
References
References
1. Vasegh Rahimparvar SF, Jafari A, Joseinzadeh F, Daemi F, Samadi F. Characteristics of women applying for a legal abortion in the Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 2018; 24(11): 1057-1064.
2. Linares-Vizcarra ML, Lukich-Valdivia ME, Montero-Zuñiga ET. Reviewing the regulatory text on social and economic rights. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental. 2024; 18(9): e08599.
3. Velluti S. Questioning legal personhood: A critique of the legal and jurisprudential underpinnings of EU immigration and asylum law. European Law Open. 2023; 2(3): 543-574.
4. Lajevardi MM. Advancement and Development of Women’s Rights in Light of the Legal System Reforms in Iran. Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies (in Asia). 2015; 9(1): 99-120.
5. Yoosefi Lebni J, Ziapour A, Fazeli Z, Saki M, Ahmadi A, Mehedi N. Exploring the challenges of men who married to adolescent girls in Western Iran: A qualitative study. J Health Science Reports. 2023; 6(10): e1595.
6. Shahabi S, Fazlalizadeh H, Stedman J, Chuang L, Shariftabrizi A, Ram R. The impact of international economic sanctions on Iranian cancer healthcare. Health Policy. 2015; 119(10): 1309-1318.
7. Fajar RN, Sutrisno A. International Legal Responses to Iran’ s Nuclear Ambitions and Human Rights Violations: A Study of Economic Sanctions. Hukum dan Politik Islam. 2025; 10(1): 44-56.
8. Karami Matin B, Soltani S, Byford S, Soofi M, Rezaei S, Kazemi-Karyani A, et al. The impacts of economic sanctions on the performance of hospitals in Iran: Implications for human rights. International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare. 2024: 17(2): 117-126.
9. Yoosefi Lebni J, Enayat H, Irandoost SF, Dehghan AA. Exploring the challenges of Afghan Refugee women facing COVID-19: A qualitative study in Iran. Front Public Health. 2022; 10: 838965.
10. HHakimi S, Mohammad Alizadeh S. Reproductive rights in Iran health system: Challenges and outcomes. Medical Law Journal. 2008; 2(7): 129-143. [Persian]
11. Asadisarvestani K, Sobotka T, Abbasi-Shavazi MJ. A pronatalist turn in population policies in Iran and its likely adverse impacts on reproductive rights, health and inequality: A critical narrative review. Reprod Health. 2023; 20: 152.
12. Ghodrati F. A comparative study of surrogacy rights in Iran and European countries: A review article. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health. 2023; 27: 100880.
13. Abbassi M, Doshmangir L, Rashidian A, Mostafavi H. Exploring Solutions for Challenges of Mental Patients’ Rights in Iran on the Basis of Various Studies Conducted in Iran and Other Countries. J Depiction of Health. 2016; 6(4): 13-22.
14. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research. 2005; 15(9): 1277-1288.
15. Holley RP. Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. portal: Libraries and the Academy. 2009; 9(4): 517-518.
16. Stringer M, Ratcliffe SJ, Evans EC, Brown LP. The cost of prenatal care attendance and pregnancy outcomes in low income working women. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing. 2005; 34(5): 551-560.
17. Spinder N, Bergman JE, Boezen HM, Vermeulen RC, Kromhout H, de Walle HE. Maternal occupational exposure and oral clefts in offspring. Environmental Health. 2017; 16(1): 83.
18. Aracena-Genao B, Leyva-Flores R, Gutiérrez-Reyes JP. Economic cost of pregnancy care attributable to the failure of Mexico’s teenage pregnancy prevention policy. Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2022; 38: e00109721.
19. Mori AT, Binyaruka P, Hangoma P, Robberstad B, Sandoy J. Patient and health system costs of managing pregnancy and birth-related complications in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. Health Economics Review. 2020; 10(1): 26.
20. Wollum A, De Zordo S, Zanini G, Mishtal J, Garnsey C, Gerdts C. Barriers and delays in access to abortion care: A cross-sectional study of people traveling to obtain care in England and the Netherlands from European countries where abortion is legal on broad grounds. Reproductive Health. 2024; 21(1): 7.
21. Fledderjohann J, Patterson S, Owino M. Food insecurity: A barrier to reproductive justice globally. International Journal of Sexual Health. 2023; 35(2): 296-311.
22. Foster DG, Biggs MA, Ralph L, Gerdts C, Roberts S, Glymour MM. Socioeconomic outcomes of women who receive and women who are denied wanted abortions in the United States. American Journal of Public Health. 2022; 112(9): 1290-1296.
23. Haseli A, Rahnejat N, Rasoal D. Reasons for unsafe abortion in Iran after pronatalist policy changes: A qualitative study. Reproductive Health. 2024; 21(1): 182.
24. Hessini L. Abortion and Islam: Policies and practice in the Middle East and North Africa. Reprod Health Matters. 2007; 15(29): 75-84.
25. Kamranpour B, Noroozi M, Bahrami M. A qualitative study exploring the needs related to the health system in women with experience of pregnancy termination due to fetal anomalies in Iran. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2020; 20(1): 573.
26. Rehnström Loi U, Lindgren M, Faxelid E, Oguttu M, Klingberg-Allvin M. Decision-making preceding induced abortion: A qualitative study of women’s experiences in Kisumu, Kenya. Reproductive Health. 2018; 15(1): 166.
27. Broen AN, Moum T, Bödtker AS, Ekeberg Ö. Reasons for induced abortion and their relation to women's emotional distress: A prospective, two-year follow-up study. General Hospital Psychiatry. 2005; 27(1): 36-43.
28. Taylor K, Compton S, Kolenic GE, Scott J, Becker N, Dalton VK, et al. Financial hardship among pregnant and postpartum women in the United States. J JAMA Network Open. 2013; 4(10): e2132103.
29. Kingston D, Tough S, Whitfield H. Prenatal and postpartum maternal psychological distress and infant development: A systematic review. J Child Psychiatry Human Development. 2012; 43(5): 683-714.
- Abstract Viewed: 49 times
- PDF Downloaded: 44 times