Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Login
  • Register

Archives of Critical Care Medicine

  • Home
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Indexing/Abstracting
    • Contact
  • Issues
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Copyright Notice
  • Publication Ethics
  • Reviewer Guidelines
  • Submissions
    • New Submission
    • Author Guidelines
  • Register
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 1 No. 3 (2015): The Analgesic Effect of Morphine and Dexmedetomidine Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia method to Control Pain After Open Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial
  4. Original/Research Article

Vol. 1 No. 3 (2015)

Aban 2023

The Analgesic Effect of Morphine and Dexmedetomidine Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia method to Control Pain After Open Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial

  • Seyed Mostafa Alavi

Archives of Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 1 No. 3 (2015), 27 Aban 2023
Published: 27.10.2023

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Background: After major surgeries, such as abdominal or thoracic surgery, the majority of patients experience moderate to severe pain that may not be optimally controlled. Inadequate pain relief may lead to complications that can hinder rehabilitation and slow recovery.

Objectives: Post-operative pain is one of the most common complaints in surgery wards especially in open cardiac surgeries. The current study compared effectiveness of the patient controlled anesthesia (PCA) method, intravenously with morphine (MO) and dexmedetomidin (DEX) to reduce post-operative pain after open cardiac surgery.

Patients and Methods: The study was a double blind randomized clinical trial. One hundred candidates for open cardiac surgery were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned into two groups of MO and DEX. The patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) pump was administered to all of the subjects, post-recovery, after insertion of catheter and filled with selected MO or DEX. Then visual analogue scale for pain severity was measured and recorded at 2, 4, 6, 8,10,12, 14, 16 and 18 hours post-operatively. SPSS V.16 was used for data analysis.

Results: Findings of the study showed a significant difference regarding the level of pain among the patients under treatment of MO and DEX at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours after the surgery, whereas there was no significant difference at 14, 16 and 18 hours. However, the pain score was lower during the first 12 hours of follow-ups in both groups. Furthermore, intubation time in DEX-PCA group was shorter than that of MO group. It was also observed that the DEX pump group had required less intravenous morphine than MO pump group in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Conclusions: The study findings showed that post-operative pain was favorably reduced in both DEX and MO-PCIA groups after open cardiac surgery. Dexmedetomidin provides beneficial effects on pain control after cardiac surgery, with less adverse effects such as nausea, itching, atelectasis, intubation time, respiratory depression and intravenous morphine consumption.

Keywords:
  • Pain Relief
  • Morphine
  • Open Cardiac Surgery
  • PDF

How to Cite

Alavi, S. M. (2023). The Analgesic Effect of Morphine and Dexmedetomidine Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia method to Control Pain After Open Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial. Archives of Critical Care Medicine, 1(3). Retrieved from https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/index.php/accm/article/view/43692
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Chambers J, Chearney LA, Romaine DS, Levy CB, Jewell CS. The facts on

file encyclopedia of health and medicine. 2007 ;3.

White PF. Use of patient-controlled analgesia for management of

acute pain. JAMA. 1988;259(2):243–7. [PubMed: 3275811].

Miller RD, Eriksson LI, Fleisher LA. Miller’s anesthesia. 7 ed. Churchill

livingstone; 2010. pp. 1662–4.

Kaplan JA, Rich DL, Lack CL, Konstadt SN. Kaplan’s cardiac anesthosia.

ed. 3. Elsevier; 2006. pp. 1161–3.

Gertler R, Brown HC, Mitchell DH, Silvius EN. Dexmedetomidine: a novel sedative-analgesic agent. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent).

;14(1):13–21. [PubMed: 16369581].

Shapiro BA, Warren J, Egol AB, Greenbaum DM, Jacobi J, Nasraway SA,

et al. Practice parameters for intravenous analgesia and sedation for

adult patients in the intensive care unit: an executive summary. Society of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 1995;23(9):1596–600.

[PubMed: 7664563].

Bhana N, Goa KL, McClellan KJ. Dexmedetomidine. Drugs.

;59(2):263–8. [PubMed: 10730549].

Aantaa R, Jaakola ML, Kallio A, Kanto J, Scheinin M, Vuorinen J. A comparison of dexmedetomidine, and alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist, and

midazolam as i.m. premedication for minor gynaecological surgery.

Br J Anaesth. 1991;67(4):402–9. [PubMed: 1681840].

Alhashemi JA, Kaki AM. Dexmedetomidine in combination with morphine PCA provides superior analgesia for shockwave lithotripsy.

Can J Anaesth. 2004;51(4):342–7. doi: 10.1007/BF03018237. [PubMed:

.

Venn RM, Karol MD, Grounds RM. Pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine infusions for sedation of postoperative patients requiring intensive caret. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88(5):669–75. [PubMed: 12067004].

Aantaa R, Scheinin M. Alpha 2-adrenergic agents in anaesthesia. Acta

Anaesthesiol Scand. 1993;37(5):433–48. [PubMed: 8395129].

Belleville JP, Ward DS, Bloor BC, Maze M. Effects of intravenous

dexmedetomidine in humans. I. Sedation, ventilation, and metabolic

rate. Anesthesiology. 1992;77(6):1125–33. [PubMed: 1361310].

Candiotti KA, Bergese SD, Bokesch PM, Feldman MA, Wisemandle W,

Bekker AY, et al. Monitored anesthesia care with dexmedetomidine:

a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial. Anesth

Analg. 2010;110(1):47–56. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181ae0856. [PubMed:

.

Herr DL, Sum-Ping S, England M. ICU sedation after coronary artery

bypass graft surgery: dexmedetomidine-based versus propofol-based

sedation regimens. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003;17(5):576–84.

Rampil I. The american society of anesthesiologists (ASA) anesthesiology. 1997 ;87(4):1026.

Yacout AG, Osman HA, Abdel-Daem MH, Hammouda SA, Elsawy MM.

Effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion on some proinflammatory cytokines, stress hormones and recovery profile in major abdominal surgery. Alexandria J Med. 2012;48(1):3–8.

Maldonado JR, Wysong A, van der Starre PJ, Block T, Miller C, Reitz BA. Dexmedetomidine and the reduction of postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery. Psychosomatics. 2009;50(3):206–17. doi:

1176/appi.psy.50.3.206. [PubMed: 19567759].

Gomez-Vazquez ME, Hernandez-Salazar E, Hernandez-Jimenez A,

Perez-Sanchez A, Zepeda-Lopez VA, Salazar-Paramo M. Clinical analgesic efficacy and side effects of dexmedetomidine in the early

postoperative period after arthroscopic knee surgery. J Clin Anesth.

;19(8):576–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2007.06.013. [PubMed:

.

Sadhasivam S, Boat A, Mahmoud M. Comparison of patientcontrolled analgesia with and without dexmedetomidine following

spine surgery in children. J Clin Anesth. 2009;21(7):493–501. doi:

1016/j.jclinane.2008.12.017. [PubMed: 20006257].

Hall JE, Uhrich TD, Barney JA, Arain SR, Ebert TJ. Sedative, amnestic,

and analgesic properties of small-dose dexmedetomidine infusions.

Anesth Analg. 2000;90(3):699–705. [PubMed: 10702460].

Martin E, Ramsay G, Mantz J, Sum-Ping ST. The role of the alpha2-

adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine in postsurgical sedation in

the intensive care unit. J Intensive Care Med. 2003;18(1):29–41. doi:

1177/0885066602239122. [PubMed: 15189665].

Flacke JW, Bloor BC, Flacke WE, Wong D, Dazza S, Stead SW, et al. Reduced narcotic requirement by clonidine with improved hemodynamic and adrenergic stability in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. Anesthesiology. 1987;67(1):11–9.

Lin TF, Yeh YC, Lin FS, Wang YP, Lin CJ, Sun WZ, et al. Effect of combining

dexmedetomidine and morphine for intravenous patient-controlled

analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102(1):117–22. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen320.

[PubMed: 18987053].

  • Abstract Viewed: 70 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 0 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Developed By

Open Journal Systems

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

Online ISSN = 2423-4443

Powered by OJSPlus