Publisher: Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases (RIGLD)
  • Register
  • Login

Gastroenterology and Hepatology from Bed to Bench

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Current
    • Archives
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • For Authors
    • Submissions
    • Author Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
  • Indexing & Abstracting
  • Announcements
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol 7, No 4 (2014): Autumn
  4. Original Article

ISSN: 2008-2258

Vol 7, No 4 (2014): Autumn

Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: Ileo-Anal Pouch versus Ileo-Rectal Anastomosis

  • Mohammad Mozafar
  • Kamran Shateri
  • Ali Tabatabaey
  • Saran Lotfollahzadeh
  • Khashayar Atqiaee

Gastroenterology and Hepatology from Bed to Bench, , , Page Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench 2014;7(4):206-210
https://doi.org/10.22037/ghfbb.v7i4.571 Published 21 September 2014

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Introduction:

Treatment of Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is centered on early recognition and curative surgery with either restorative proctocolectomy with ileal-pouch-anal-anastomosis (IPAA) or colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA). In this study we describe the presentation, treatment, and complications of 27 FAP patients.

Method:

All patients diagnosed with FAP at our center from 2008 to 2012 were included in this case series. Either IPAA or IRA was used for treatment. Complications were recorded for 12 months after the procedure.

Results:

Overall 27 patients were included, 12 (44.44%) index patients, and 15 (55.55%) relatives diagnosed by screening. Eight Index patients presented with rectal bleeding, two with occult fecal blood and two with abdominal masses found to be desmoid tumors. Nineteen patients were treated by IPAA, 6 with IRA, and 2 were inoperable due to diffuse desmoid tumors. Daytime stool frequency was the most common side effect (70.37%), followed by bowel discomfort episodes (55.56%), requiring dietary restrictions (37.4%), passive incontinence (25.93%), soiling (22.22%), nighttime stool frequency (18.52%), Flatus incontinence (16.0%), and anastomosis leakage (3.70%). On average patients treated by IPAA experienced less complication than those treated by IRA.

Conclusion:

Compared with previous reports, this series had older age of diagnosis, higher rate of adenocarcinoma at diagnosis, and fewer side effects after IPAA than IRA. The latter may reflect technique improvement with experience, and if supported by future studies, will cement IPAA as the treatment of choice in FAP.

  • PDF

How to Cite

Mozafar, M., Shateri, K., Tabatabaey, A., Lotfollahzadeh, S., & Atqiaee, K. (2014). Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: Ileo-Anal Pouch versus Ileo-Rectal Anastomosis. Gastroenterology and Hepatology from Bed to Bench, 7(4), Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench 2014;7(4):206-210. https://doi.org/10.22037/ghfbb.v7i4.571
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 123 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 83 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram
Open Journal Systems
Keywords
Current Issue
  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

GHFBB journal is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Print ISSN: 2008-2258
Online ISSN: 2008-4234

Support Contact: ghfbb.journal@gmail.com

 

GHFBB is an open-access journal and does not charge fees for authors who submit their articles and for readers who access PDF files of published articles.

The template of this website is designed by Sinaweb