Increasing Efficiency of Short-Tandem-Repeat Genotyping for a Single Hair by Improving DNA Extraction: A Practical Study Hair genotype efficiency for STR
Journal of Ophthalmic and Optometric Sciences,
Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022),
8 November 2023
,
Page 1-11
https://doi.org/10.22037/joos.v6i2.41542
Abstract
Background: Although DNA isolation using the commercial chelex 100 is inexpensive and fast, the DNA gained by this method shows a low concentration and is of poor quality in certain materials, such as hairs; high amount of DNA will also inhibit the efficiency of the PCR amplification.
Material and Methods: In the present study, we have improved a hair DNA isolation approach based on chelex 100, where ammonium acetate was added to precipitate proteins, ethanol was used to pellet out DNA, and glycogen was applied as a carrier of successful DNA recovery.
Result: As a result, we obtained high quality of DNA, which can be successfully used for authentic STR analysis from one single hair. We also noticed that the DNA dilution from 25 to 125 fold presented very good quality for short-tandem-repeat (STR) genotyping by only chelex 100 extraction, demonstrating the efficiency for STR genotyping can be improved by dilution of PCR inhibitors or other unknown inhibitors.
Conclusion: Taken together, our improved extraction and dilution of DNA would be used as an option for the application of hair STR analysis in judicial authentication and forensic sciences. This method may be usable for other samples, such as, eyelashes, eyebrows, tissues, sperms and blood samples in human and animals for STR genotype or DNA fingerprinting, and genetics diagnosis including retinal diseases.
- Short-tandem-repeat (STR)
- Genotype
- Hair
- DNA Extraction
- Genetics
- 2022-04-03 (3)
- 2022-04-03 (2)
- 2023-11-08 (1)
How to Cite
References
Epplen JT, Melmer G, Schmidt P, Roewer L, Hundrieser J, Epplen C, et al. On the potential of simple repetitive DNA for fingerprinting in clinical, forensic, and evolutionary dynamic studies. Clin Investig. 1992;70(11):1043-51.
Alford RL, Hammond HA, Coto I, Caskey CT. Rapid and efficient resolution of parentage by amplification of short tandem repeats. Am J Hum Genet. 1994;55(1):190-5.
Parson W. Age Estimation with DNA: From Forensic DNA Fingerprinting to Forensic (Epi)Genomics: A Mini-Review. Gerontology. 2018;64(4):326-32.
Hammond HA, Jin L, Zhong Y, Caskey CT, Chakraborty R. Evaluation of 13 short tandem repeat loci for use in personal identification applications. Am J Hum Genet. 1994;55(1):175-89.
Kowalczyk M, Zawadzka E, Szewczuk D, Gryzinska M, Jakubczak A. Molecular markers used in forensic genetics. Med Sci Law. 2018;58(4):201-9.
Estrada LA, Martinez-Cuazitl A, Mata-Miranda MM, Gonzalez-Diaz CA, Vazquez-Zapien GJ, Saldana-Rivera E, et al. Evaluation of the effect of heat damage on DNA extracted from the dental pulp of restored teeth. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2019;37:54-9.
Srivastava A, Kumawat R, Dixit S, Kaitholia K, Shrivastava D, Yadav VK, et al. Genetic data for PowerPlex 21 autosomal and PowerPlex 23 Y-STR loci from population of the state of Uttar Pradesh, India. Int J Legal Med. 2019;133(5):1381-3.
Zou X, Li Y, Wei Z, Wang T, Hu Y, Zhu Y, et al. Population data and forensic efficiency of 21 autosomal STR loci included in AGCU EX22 amplification system in the Wanzhou Han population. Int J Legal Med. 2018;132(1):153-5.
Parsons TJ, Huel RML, Bajunovic Z, Rizvic A. Large scale DNA identification: The ICMP experience. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019;38:236-44.
Kretzschmar T, Mbanjo EGN, Magalit GA, Dwiyanti MS, Habib MA, Diaz MG, et al. DNA fingerprinting at farm level maps rice biodiversity across Bangladesh and reveals regional varietal preferences. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):14920.
Liu X, Cheng J, Mei Z, Wei C, Khan MA, Peng J, et al. SCAR marker for identification and discrimination of specific medicinal Lycium chinense Miller from Lycium species from ramp-PCR RAPD fragments. 3 Biotech. 2020;10(8):334.
Joyce AL, Torres MM, Torres R, Moreno M. Genetic variability of the Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquito in El Salvador, vector of dengue, yellow fever, chikungunya and Zika. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11(1):637.
Li Y, Shang Q, Li P, Cao J, Zhu L, Jager MJ, et al. Characterization of a conjunctival melanoma cell line CM-AS16, newly-established from a metastatic Han Chinese patient. Exp Eye Res. 2018;173:51-63.
Stray JE, Liu JY, Brevnov MG, Shewale JG. Extraction of DNA from Forensic Biological Samples for Genotyping. Forensic Sci Rev. 2010;22(2):159-75.
Barbisin M, Shewale JG. Assessment of DNA Extracted from Forensic Samples Prior to Genotyping. Forensic Sci Rev. 2010;22(2):199-214.
Menchhoff SI, Delacruz MT, Hytinen ME, Cox JO, Miller MT, Dawson Cruz T. DNA Purification Cell Lysis and Wash Step Modifications for Low-Template DNA Sample Processing(). Journal of forensic sciences. 2020;65(2):597-600.
Schrader C, Schielke A, Ellerbroek L, Johne R. PCR inhibitors - occurrence, properties and removal. Journal of applied microbiology. 2012;113(5):1014-26.
Fu S, Cheng J, Wei C, Yang L, Xiao X, Zhang D, et al. Development of diagnostic SCAR markers for genomic DNA amplifications in breast carcinoma by DNA cloning of high-GC RAMP-PCR fragments. Oncotarget. 2017;8(27):43866-77.
Cheng J, Song B, Fu J, Zheng X, He T, Fu J. Genetic polymorphism of 19 autosomal STR loci in the Yi ethnic minority of Liangshan Yi autonomous prefecture from Sichuan province in China. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):16327.
Yang L, Fu J, Cheng J, Zhou B, Liu X, Anuchapreeda S, et al. Novel, heterozygous, pathogenic variant (c.4272delA: p.I1426Ffs*2) for the NF1 gene in a large Chinese family with neurofibromatosis type 1. Mol Biol Rep. 2023;50(2):1117-23.
Fu J, Cheng J, Wei C, Khan MA, Jin Z, Fu J. Assessing 23 Y-STR loci mutation rates in Chinese Han father-son pairs from southwestern China. Mol Biol Rep. 2020;47(10):7755-60.
Fu J, Cheng J, Liu X, Li J, Wei C, Zheng X, et al. Evaluation genotypes of cancer cell lines HCC1954 and SiHa by short tandem repeat (STR) analysis and DNA sequencing. Mol Biol Rep. 2018;45(6):2689-95..
Gill P, Bleka O, Fonnelop AE. Limitations of qPCR to estimate DNA quantity: An RFU method to facilitate inter-laboratory comparisons for activity level, and general applicability. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2022;61:102777.
Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higuchi R. Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques. 1991;10(4):506-13.
Sweet D, Lorente M, Valenzuela A, Lorente JA, Alvarez JC. Increasing DNA extraction yield from saliva stains with a modified Chelex method. Forensic Sci Int. 1996;83(3):167-77.
Al-Soud WA, Radstrom P. Purification and characterization of PCR-inhibitory components in blood cells. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39(2):485-93.
Singh UA, Kumari M, Iyengar S. Method for improving the quality of genomic DNA obtained from minute quantities of tissue and blood samples using Chelex 100 resin. Biol Proced Online. 2018;20:12.
Samsuwan J, Somboonchokepisal T, Akaraputtiporn T, Srimuang T, Phuengsukdaeng P, Suwannarat A, et al. A method for extracting DNA from hard tissues for use in forensic identification. Biomed Rep. 2018;9(5):433-8.
Cornwell SJ, Tay JW, Allan RK, Zoranjic J, O'Rourke NJ, Byard GB, et al. Evaluation of DNA Extraction Methods for Processing Fingerprint Powder-Coated Forensic Evidence. Journal of forensic sciences. 2020;65(3):960-5.
Osterburg HH, Allen JK, Finch CE. The use of ammonium acetate in the precipitation of ribonucleic acid. The Biochemical journal. 1975;147(2):367-8.
- Abstract Viewed: 80 times
- pdf Downloaded: 33 times