• Logo
  • SBMUJournals

Comparison of Supracostal and Infracostal Access For Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

zhaohui He, Fucai Tang, Zechao Lu, Ye He, Genggeng Wei, Fangling Zhong, Guohua Zeng, Weizhou Wu, Lemin Yan, Zhibiao Li
319

Views


Abstract

 Purpose: In this meta-analysis, we aimed to compared efficacy and safety of supracostal and infracostal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

Materials and Methods: We included eligible studies from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Sci­ence and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Literature searching, quality assessment and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Data were analyzed by RevMan software. Binary and continuous variables were calculated as odds ratios (OR) and mean difference (MD).

Results: Two prospective comparative studies and seven retrospective observational studies were included in the meta-analysis, which contained 1,024 cases of supracostal access and 1,249 cases of infracostal access for PCNL. The supracostal access resulted in a significant reduced mean hemoglobin (95% CI: 0.26-3.46, MD = 1.86 g/L, P = .02) and a higher incidence of hydrothorax (95% CI: 4.77-22.95: OR = 10.47, P < .00001) compared to infracostal access. However, there no difference between supracostal and infracostal access regarding additional procedures (95% CI: 0.70-1.69, OR = 1.09, P = .71), stone-free rate (95% CI: 0.80-1.72, OR = 1.18, P = .41), length of hospital stay (95% CI: -0.03-0.37, MD = 0.17 day, P = .10), and occurrence of fever (95% CI: 0.95-2.03, OR = 1.39, P = .09) and blood transfusion (95% CI: 0.45-1.70, OR = 0.88, P = .70). No publication bias was identified in the study.

Conclusion: Supracostal access was effective, but not as safe as infracostal access PCNL due to a higher risk of reduced hemoglobin and hydrothorax. Therefore, infracostal access should be the preferred safe and effective approach recommended for PCNL. When a supracostal puncture is performed, essential precautions to avoid he­moglobin loss and hydrothorax should be used.


References

Fernstrom I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1976; 10 (3):257-259.

Alken P, Hutschenreiter G, Gunther R, Marberger M. Percutaneous stone manipulation. J Urol 1981; 125 (4):463-466.

Zhou X, Sun X, Chen X, et al. Effect of Obesity on Outcomes of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Renal Stone Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol Int 2017; 98 (4):382-390.

Schultz-Lampel D, Lampel A. The surgical management of stones in children. BJU Int 2001; 87 (8):732-740.

Sukumar S, Nair B, Ginil KP, Sanjeevan KV, Sanjay BH. Supracostal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: less morbid, more effective. Int Urol Nephrol 2008; 40 (2):263-267.

Mousavi-Bahar SH, Mehrabi S, Moslemi MK. The safety and efficacy of PCNL with supracostal approach in the treatment of renal stones. Int Urol Nephrol 2011; 43 (4):983-987.

Golijanin D, Katz R, Verstandig A, Sasson T, Landau EH, Meretyk S. The supracostal percutaneous nephrostomy for treatment of staghorn and complex kidney stones. J Endourol 1998; 12 (5):403-405.

Kekre NS, Gopalakrishnan GG, Gupta GG, Abraham BN, Sharma E. Supracostal approach in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: experience with 102 cases. J Endourol 2001; 15 (8):789-791.

Jun-Ou J, Lojanapiwat B. Supracostal access: does it affect tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy efficacy and safety? Int Braz J Urol 2010; 36(2):171–176

Munver R, Delvecchio FC, Newman GE, Preminger GM. Critical analysis of supracostal access for percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 2001;166 (4):1242-1246.

GA Wells, B Shea, D O'Connell, et al. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses.

http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed 23 Nov 2014

Honey RJ, Wiesenthal JD, Ghiculete D, Pace S, Ray AA, Pace KT. Comparison of supracostal versus infracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the novel prone-flexed patient position. J Endourol 2011; 25 (6):947-954.

Fan D, Song L, Xie D, et al A comparison of supracostal and infracostal access approaches in treating renal and upper ureteral stones using MPCNL with the aid of a patented system. BMC Urol 2015;15:102.

Zhang Jing, Zhao Chunli. Applied Anatomy and Clinical Application of Supracostal Approach for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy .University Of Hebei, 2012, 1367.

Yang Wen-zeng, ZHANG Jing, ZHAO Chun-li. To Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Supracostal Access for PCNL in the Treatment of Upper Ureter Calculi. Chinese General Practice, 2012; 15:316-317.

Sinha M, Krishnappa P, Subudhi SK, Krishnamoorthy V. Supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective comparative study. Indian J Urol 2016;32(1):45-9.

Singh R, Kankalia SP, Sabale V, et al. Comparative evaluation of upper versus lower calyceal approach in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for managing complex renal calculi. Urol Ann 2015;7 (1):31-35.

Ozgor F, Tepeler A, Basibuyuk I, et al . Supracostal access for miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of supracostal and infracostal approaches. Urolithiasis 2017; 46(3):279-283.

Lojanapiwat B, Prasopsuk S. Upper-pole access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of supracostal and infracostal approaches. J Endourol. 2006;20(7):491-4

Munver R, Delvecchio FC, Newman GE, Preminger GM. Critical analysis of supracostal access for percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 2001;166 (4):1242-1246.

Galvin DJ, Pearle MS. The contemporary management of renal and ureteric calculi. BJU Int 2006;98 (6):1283-1288.

Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2007;51 (4):899-906; discussion 906.

Aron M, Yadav R, Goel R, et al. Multi-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large complete staghorn calculi. Urol Int 2005;75 (4):327-332.

Cocuzza M, Colombo JR Jr, Cocuzza AL, et al. Outcomes of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy with holmium laser for upper urinary tract calculi. Int Braz J Urol. 2008;34(2):143-9; discussion 149-50

Shaban A, Kodera A, El Ghoneimy MN, Orban TZ, Mursi K, Hegazy A. Safety and efficacy of supracostal access in percutaneous renal surgery. J Endourol 2008;22 (1):29-34.

Golijanin D, Katz R, Verstandig A, Sasson T, Landau EH, Meretyk S. The supracostal percutaneous nephrostomy for treatment of staghorn and complex kidney stones. J Endourol 1998;12 (5):403-405.

Lang E, Thomas R, Davis R, et al. Risks, advantages, and complications of intercostal vs subcostal approach for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Urology 2009;74 (4):751-755.

Weizer AZ, Auge BK, Silverstein AD, et al. Routine postoperative imaging is important after ureteroscopic stone manipulation. J Urol 2002;168 (1):46-50

Pedro RN, Netto NR. Upper-pole access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2009;23 (10):1645-1647.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/uj.v0i0.4727

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.