Supine Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Retrograde Semi-rigid Ureteroscopic guidwire retrieval: Description of an Evolved Technique

Mahziar Khazaali, Dinyar Khazaeli, Hayat Moombeini, Jamal Jafari-Samim

Abstract


95

Purpose: Ultrasound-guided PCNL in Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia (GMSV) position has taken into consideration during the last decade; however, guidewire slippage during tract dilatation is still a big concern in this approach. Here we presented our results of combination of this modification with ureteroscopic guidewire retrieval to ensure a safe and confident renal access.
Materials and Methods: From June 2015 to March 2016, 30 consecutive patients with renal stone of ? 2.5 cm were enrolled. After general anesthesia, all patients were positioned in GMSV position. Semi-rigid ureteroscopy up to the renal pelvis was performed by an assistant urologist. Ultrasound (US)-guided renal access and passage of guidewire was performed by another urologist after which the first urologist grasped and retrieved the guidewire from the renal pelvis to the ureter and then out of urethra. Stone manipulation was performed as standard PCNL.
All patients were evaluated regarding age, stone burden, anthropometrics measurements, major and minor surgical complications, and stone free rate.
Result: Guidewire retrieval was successful in 26 patients (86.7%) and tract dilatation was achieved in all (100%) of this group. In other 4 patients (13.3%) retrograde endoscopic guide wire retrieval failed; in one patient, (3.33%) ureteroscope did not reach the renal pelvis because of tall stature; One patient (3.33%) had narrow calyceal infundibulum which prevented the guidwire passage along the stone to reach to the renal pelvis, and for two patients (6.67%) ureteroscope did not pass the ureteropelvic junction because of narrow ureteropelvic angle.
Conclusion: Guidewire retrieval seems to improve the results of US-guided GMSV position PCNL by eliminating the possibility of guidewire slippage during tract dilatation.

Full Text:

PDF

54

References


Safak M, Olgar T, Bor D, et al. Radiation doses of patients and urologists during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Radiol Prot. 2009;29:409-15.

Majidpour HS. Risk of radiation exposure during PCNL. Urol J. 2010;7:87-9.

Basiri A, Mohammadi Sichani M, Hosseini SR,et al. X-ray-free percutaneous nephrolithotomy in supine position with ultrasound guidance. World J Urol. 2010;28:239-44.

Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, Cossu M, et al. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position: a new standard for percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Eur Urol. 2008;54:1393-403.

Scoffone C, Cracco C. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: opinion- supine position. Clinical management of urolithiasis. Heidelberg: Springer; 2013:117- 21.

Miano R, Scoffone C, De Nunzio C, et al. Position: prone or supine is the issue of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol.2010;24:931-8.

Ibarluzea G, Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, et al. Supine Valdivia and modified lithotomy position for simultaneous anterograde and retrograde endourological access. BJU Int. 2007;100:233-6.

Forrest JB, Clemens JQ, Finamore P, et al. AUA Best Practice Statement for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing urologic surgery. J Urol. 2009;181:1170-7.

Goodwin WE, Casey WC, Woolf W. Percutaneous trocar (needle) nephrostomy in hydronephrosis. J Am Med Assoc. 1955;157:891-4.

Fernstrom I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1976;10:257-9.

Falahatkar S, Moghaddam AA, Salehi M, Nikpour S, Esmaili F, Khaki N. Complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotripsy comparison with the prone standard technique. J Endourol. 2008;22:2513-7.

Falahatkar S, Neiroomand H, Enshaei A, et al. Totally ultrasound versus fluoroscopically guided complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: a first report. J Endourol. 2010;24:1421-6.

Basiri A, Mohammadi Sichani M. Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy, is it really effective? A systematic review of literature. Urol J. 2009;6:73-7.

Basiri A, Ziaee AM, Kianian HR, et al. Ultrasonographic versus fluoroscopic access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized clinical trial. J Endourol. 2008;22:281-4.

Manohar T, Jain P, Desai M. Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Effective approach to high-risk and morbidly obese patients. J Endourol. 2007;21:44-9.

Hoznek A, Rode J, Ouzaid I, et al. Modified supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large kidney and ureteral stones: technique and results. Eur Urol. 2012;61:164-70.

Ng MT, Sun WH, Cheng CW, et al. Supine position is safe and effective for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2004;18:469-74.

Yan S, Xiang F, Yongsheng S. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy guided solely by ultrasonography: a 5-year study of >700 cases. BJU Int. 2013;112:965-71.

Steele D, Marshall V. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position: a neglected approach? J Endourol.2007;21:1433-7.

Bach C, Goyal A, Kumar P, et al. The Barts 'flank-free' modified supine position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Int.2012;89:365-8.

Kumar P, Bach C, Kachrilas S, et al. Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): 'in vogue' but in which position? BJU Int. 2012;110:E1018-21.

Zhou X, Gao X, Wen J, et al. Clinical value of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position under the guidance of real-time ultrasound: report of 92 cases. Urol Res. 2008;36:111-4.

Hosseini MM, Yousefi A, Rastegari M. Pure ultrasonography-guided radiation-free percutaneous nephrolithotomy: report of 357 cases. Springerplus. 2015 Jul 3;4:313.

Nouralizadeh A, Pakmanesh H, Basiri A, et al. Solo Sonographically Guided PCNL under Spinal Anesthesia: Defining Predictors of Success. Scientifica (Cairo). 2016;2016:5938514.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/uj.v14i6.4080


Creative Commons License 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License