Bilateral Laparoscopic Stone Surgery for Renal Stones- A Case Series

Akbar Nouralizadeh, Amir H Kashi, Reza Valipour, Mahmood Reza Nasiri Kopaee, Mahdi Zeinali, Reza Sarhangnejad

Abstract


47

Purpose: To present our experience with synchronous or metachronous laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and ureterolithotomy for patients with bilateral urolithiasis.
Materials and Methods: The data of all patients who underwent laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (± ureterolithotomy) for bilateral renal and/or ureteral stones from November 2009 to July 2014 were included. Laparoscopic operations were performed through a transperitoneal approach.
Results: 10 patients underwent laparoscopic operations for renal stones (19 kidney stones) and ureteral stones (1 ureteral stone). 4 patients underwent synchronous operations and 6 patients underwent metachronous operations. The mean ± SD of operation duration were 212 ± 51 minutes for synchronous operations and 166 ± 41 minutes for metachronous operations. Residual stone was observed 5 patients. No patient developed urinary leakage.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and/or ureterolithotomy for bilateral stones is a feasible option in centers with experience in laparoscopy.

Full Text:

PDF

31

References


Gaur DD, Agarwal DK, Purohit KC, Darshane AS. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy. J Urol. 1994;151:927-9.

Aminsharifi A, Hosseini MM, Khakbaz A. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for a solitary renal pelvis stone larger than 3 cm: a prospective cohort study. Urolithiasis. 2013;41:493-7.

Gaur DDP, H.M.; Madhusudhana, H.R.; Rathi, S.S. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy: how does it compare with percutaneous nephrolithotomy for larger stones? Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2001;10:105-9.

Goel A, Hemal AK. Evaluation of role of retroperitoneoscopic pyelolithotomy and its comparison with percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Int Urol Nephrol.2003;35:73-6.

Haggag YM, Morsy G, Badr MM, Al Emam AB, Farid M, Etafy M. Comparative study of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of large renal pelvic stones. Can Urol Assoc J. 2013;7:E171-5.

Lee JW, Cho SY, Jeong CW, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with multiple renal stones in various parts of the pelvocalyceal system. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A.2014;24:634-9.

Li S, Liu TZ, Wang XH, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of large renal pelvic calculi: a pilot study. J Endourol. 2014;28:946-50.

Meria P, Milcent S, Desgrandchamps F, Mongiat-Artus P, Duclos JM, Teillac P. Management of pelvic stones larger than 20 mm: laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelolithotomy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Urol Int. 2005;75:322-6.

Nouralizadeh A, Simforoosh N, Soltani MH, et al. Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelolithotomy for management of staghorn renal calculi. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012;22:61-5.

Tefekli A, Tepeler A, Akman T, et al. The comparison of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of solitary large renal pelvic stones. Urol Res. 2012;40:549-55.

Gigli F, Cerruto MA, Zattoni F. [Synchronous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).]. Urologia. 2008;75:108-12.

Maheshwari PN, Andankar M, Hegde S, Bansal M. Bilateral single-session percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a feasible and safe treatment. J Endourol. 2000;14:285-7.

Rao RK, Ranganath MS, Prasad TK. Synchronized bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in a horseshoe kidney. Indian J Urol. 2008;24:120-2.

Nambirajan T, Jeschke S, Albqami N, Abukora F, Leeb K, Janetschek G. Role of laparoscopy in management of renal stones: singlecenter experience and review of literature. J Endourol. 2005;19:353-9.

Simforoosh N, Aminsharifi A. Laparoscopic management in stone disease. Curr Opin Urol. 2013;23:169-74.

Basiri A, Tabibi A, Nouralizadeh A, et al. Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with renal pelvic stones: a randomized clinical trial. Urol J. 2014;11:1932-7.

Wang J, Yang Y, Chen M, et al. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of large renal pelvic calculi (diameter >2 cm): a metaanalysis. Acta Chir Belg. 2016;116:346-56.

Pastore AL, Palleschi G, Silvestri L, et al. Combined laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and endoscopic pyelolithotripsy for staghorn calculi: long-term follow-up results from a case series. Ther Adv Urol. 2016;8:3-8.

Wang X, Li S, Liu T, Guo Y, Yang Z. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy as surgical management for large renal pelvic calculi: a meta-analysis. J Urol. 2013;190:888-93.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/uj.v14i6.3802


Creative Commons License 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License