Background and Aim: Martyrs and veterans progeny students have unique status due to their special life condition comparing with non-veteran students. The aim of this study is to compare the psychological hardiness and resilience against educational stressors in veterans and non-veteran students.
Materials and Methods: Causal-comparative research method was utilized for this study. Sample population included all veterans and non-veterans high school students of Ilkhechi (Tabriz) in the academic year of 2016 and 2017. Sample of 80 students (40 veterans and 40 normal students) were randomly selected using Cochran formula. Data collection tools included Kobasa Hardiness Scale and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. For data analysis, MANOVA were performed, using SPSS version 19. The significance level was considered to be 0.05.
Results: Results showed that there are significant differences in the psychological hardiness and resilience variables between veteran and non-veteran students (P<0.001). Based on the results, veteran students are less than average in psychological hardiness and resilience variables.
Conclusion: Our results, consistent with previous findings,indicate that students with high levels of psychological hardiness and resilience are able to maintain their psychological health in stressful and tough situations and are more prone psychological adaptation.
Donaldson B. War and its potentive effects. J Am Psychol. 2014; 12(4): 391-402.
Ingram RE, Price JM. The role of vulnerability in understanding psychopathology. In R. E. Ingram, & J. M. Price (Eds.), Vulnerability to psychopathology: risk across the lifespan (pp. 3-19). New York: The Guilford Press; 2001.
Cobasa S. Hardiness person and stress. New York: Mc Grows Hill press; 1995.
Yarali Kh. Simple and multiple relationships of psychological hardiness and social support with female teachers' mental and physical health in Shushtar, a Master's thesis in General Psychology, Islamic Azad University of Ahvaz; 2010. [In Persian]
Birhof HW. Social behavior desirable from the viewpoint of social psychology. Translation: Rezvan Sedginezhad. Tehran: Golazin; 2015. [Persian]
Jon KM, Douglas TK. When Adaptations go awry: Functional and dysfunctional aspects of social Anxiety. Soc Issues Policy Rev. 2010; 4(1): 111– 142.
Hetherington EM, Cox M, Cox R. Effects of divorce on parents and children. In: M. Lamb, (Ed.), Nontraditional families, Laurence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ; 1982.
Richardson GE. The metatheory of resilience and resiliency. J Clin Psychol. 2002; 58(3): 307-321.
Hallberg S. Psychological effects of war. J Mil Psychol. 2001; 91: 119-183.
Davison H. Stress and coping. Newyork: mcerow High press; 1984.
Hamilton D. The war and family reflection. J Health Psychol; 2008; 13: 288-299.
Rabertson D. Psychological effects of war in family structurs. J Personal. 2009; 33 (1): 112 -119.
Kobassa SC, Maddi SR, Puccetti MC. Personality and exercise as buffers in the stress-illness relationship. J Behav Med. 1982; 5(4): 391-404.
Ghorbani N. Existential structure of personality hardiness. Journal of Psychological Research. 1995; 3(4): 76-92. [In Persian]
Besharat MA. Hardiness and Coping with Stress. Journal of Psychological Studies 2007; 3(2): 109-129. [In Persian]
Conner KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: The Conner-Davidson Resilience scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety. 2003; 18(2):76-82.
Goldnberg I, Goldnberg H. Family Therapy. Translation: Hamid Reza Hosin Shahi, Siamak Naghbandi, Elham Arjmand. Tehran: Nashre Ravan; 2013. [Persian]
Maddi SR. The effectiveness of hardiness training. J Consult Psychol. 1998; 13: 89 – 96.
Taheri R. Relationship between family communication patterns and self-concept with coping styles in Eram academic students of higher education instituation. Counseling M.A Thesis of Islamic Azad University of Marvdasht; 2012. [Persian]
Samadian sarbangoli G. Compare hardiness, coping styles and resilience in student's veteran and control. M.A Thesis of Islamic Azad University of Tabriz; 2013. [In Persian]
Masten AS. Ordinary majic: Resilience processes in development. Am Psychol. 2001; 56: 227-238.
Fitzpatrick MA. The Family communication patterns theory observations on its development and application. J Fam Comm. 2004; 4: 167-79.
Earls F. The fathers not the mothers. Their importance and influence with infant and young children. J Psychiatry. 2014; 29: 209-220.
Khazaeli Parsa F. Resilience, capacity to overcome difficulties persisted stubbornly self Improvement student counseling center. Student and Cultural; 2008. [In Persian