• Logo
  • SBMUJournals

Monomethyl auristatin E Exhibits Potent Cytotoxic Activity against Human Cancer Cell Lines SKBR3 and HEK293

Meghdad Abdollahpour-Alitappeh, Sepand Razavi-vakhshourpour, Majid Lotfinia, Saeed Jahandideh, Hamid Najminejad, Saeed Balalaie, Reza Moazzami, Elnaz Shams, Mahdi Habibi-Anbouhi, Mohsen Abolhassani




Background: Monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) is a synthetic analog of dolastatin 10, a compound originally isolated from the marine mollusk. MMAE, as a highly potent microtubule inhibitor, exerts its potent cytotoxic effect by inhibiting microtubule assembly, tubulin-dependent GTP hydrolysis and microtubes polymerization. This molecule, by itself, lacks the tumor specificity required to elicit therapeutic benefit. Nevertheless, the extremely cytotoxic potential of MMAE could be harnessed in the form of MMAE-antibody conjugates. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cytotoxic activity of MMAE against breast (SKBR3) and kidney (HEK293) cancer cell lines in an in vitro cell-based assay.

Materials and Methods: SKBR3 and HEK293 cells were treated with different concentrations ranging from 0.002048, 0.01024, 0.0512, 0.256, 1.28, 6.4, 32, 160, 800 and 4000 nM of MMAE, and cell viability was determined after 72 hours using an MTT colorimetric assay. The effect of MMAE was regularly monitored by direct observation using an invert microscope.

Results: Microscopic observation showed that there was a concentration-dependent increase in cell death. Results from the MTT assay revealed a statistically significant loss of viability (P<0.0001) at concentrations ranging from 0.01024 to 4000 nM in SKBR3 cells, and 0.0512 to 4000 nM in HEK293 cells. Our findings showed that MMAE inhibited the growth of SKBR3 and HEK293 cells in a concentration-dependent manner, with IC50 values of 3.27 ± 0.42 and 4.24 ± 0.37 nM, respectively.

Conclusion: MMAE was able to significantly inhibit cell growth at nanomolar concentrations, emphasizing its great potential for the development of antibody-drug conjugates.


Monomethyl auristatin E; cytotoxicity; Antibody-drug conjugate; SKBR3; HEK293


Cormier A, Marchand M, Ravelli RB, Knossow M, Gigant B. Structural insight into the inhibition of tubulin by vinca domain peptide ligands. EMBO reports. 2008;9(11):1101-6.

Dumontet C, Jordan MA. Microtubule-binding agents: a dynamic field of cancer therapeutics. Nature reviews. Drug discovery. 2010;9(10):790-803.

Kalemkerian GP, Ou X, Adil MR, et al. Activity of dolastatin 10 against small-cell lung cancer in vitro and in vivo: induction of apoptosis and bcl-2 modification. Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology. 1999;43(6):507-15.

Abdollahpour-Alitappeh M H-AM, Balalaie S, Golmohammadi F, Lotfinia M, Abolhassani M. A new and simple non-chromatographic method for isolation of drug/linker constructs: vc-MMAE evaluation. J Herbmed Pharmacol. 2017;6(4):153-9.

Bai RL, Pettit GR, Hamel E. Binding of dolastatin 10 to tubulin at a distinct site for peptide antimitotic agents near the exchangeable nucleotide and vinca alkaloid sites. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1990;265(28):17141-9.

Bai R, Pettit GR, Hamel E. Dolastatin 10, a powerful cytostatic peptide derived from a marine animal. Inhibition of tubulin polymerization mediated through the vinca alkaloid binding domain. Biochemical pharmacology. 1990;39(12):1941-9.

Schoffski P, Thate B, Beutel G, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of TZT-1027, a novel synthetic dolastatin 10 derivative, administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks in patients with advanced refractory cancer. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology / ESMO. 2004;15(4):671-9.

Bai R, Roach MC, Jayaram SK, et al. Differential effects of active isomers, segments, and analogs of dolastatin 10 on ligand interactions with tubulin. Correlation with cytotoxicity. Biochemical pharmacology. 1993;45(7):150315.

Bai RL, Pettit GR, Hamel E. Structure-activity studies with chiral isomers and with segments of the antimitotic marine peptide dolastatin 10. Biochemical pharmacology. 1990;40(8):1859-64.

Kim EG, Kim KM. Strategies and Advancement in Antibody-Drug Conjugate Optimization for Targeted Cancer Therapeutics. Biomolecules & therapeutics. 2015;23(6):493-509.

Dosio F, Brusa P, Cattel L. Immunotoxins and anticancer drug conjugate assemblies: the role of the linkage between components. Toxins. 2011;3(7):848-83.

Gerber HP, Kung-Sutherland M, Stone I, et al. Potent antitumor activity of the anti-CD19 auristatin antibody drug conjugate hBU12-vcMMAE against rituximab-sensitive and -resistant lymphomas. Blood. 2009;113(18):4352-61.

Doronina SO, Toki BE, Torgov MY, et al. Development of potent monoclonal antibody auristatin conjugates for cancer therapy. Nature biotechnology. 2003;21(7):778-84.

Panowski S, Bhakta S, Raab H, Polakis P, Junutula JR. Site-specific antibody drug conjugates for cancer therapy. mAbs. 2014;6(1):34-45.

Ma D, Hopf CE, Malewicz AD, et al. Potent antitumor activity of an auristatin-conjugated, fully human monoclonal antibody to prostate-specific membrane antigen. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2006;12(8):2591-6.

Younes A, Bartlett NL, Leonard JP, et al. Brentuximab vedotin (SGN-35) for relapsed CD30-positive lymphomas. The New England journal of medicine. 2010;363(19):1812-21.

Abdollahpour-Alitappeh M, Lotfinia M, Razavi-Vakhshourpour S, et al. Evaluation of Factors Influencing Antibody Reduction for Development of Antibody Drug Conjugates. Iranian biomedical journal. 2017;21(4):270-4.

Goozner M. Drug approvals 2011: focus on companion diagnostics. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2012;104(2):84-6.

Hamann PR, Hinman LM, Beyer CF, et al. An anti-CD33 antibody-calicheamicin conjugate for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Choice of linker. Bioconjugate chemistry. 2002;13(1):40-6.

Hamann PR, Hinman LM, Hollander I, et al. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin, a potent and selective anti-CD33 antibody-calicheamicin conjugate for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Bioconjugate chemistry. 2002;13(1):47-58.

Sineh Sepehr K, Baradaran B, Mazandarani M, Yousefi B, Abdollahpour Alitappeh M, Khori V. Growth-Inhibitory and Apoptosis-Inducing Effects of Punica granatum L. var. spinosa (Apple Punice) on Fibrosarcoma Cell Lines. Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin. 2014;4(Suppl 2):583-90.

Li H, Yu C, Jiang J, et al. An anti-HER2 antibody conjugated with monomethyl auristatin E is highly effective in HER2-positive human gastric cancer. Cancer biology & therapy. 2016;17(4):346-54.

Abdollahpour-Alitappeh M AA, Heidarnejad F, Habibi-Anbouhi M, Lotfinia M, Razavi-vakhshourpour S, et al. Monomethyl Auristatin E, a Potent Cytotoxic Payload for Development of Antibody-Drug Conjugates against Breast Cancer. Novel Biomed. 2017;5(3):98-103.

Burns KE, Robinson MK, Thevenin D. Inhibition of cancer cell proliferation and breast tumor targeting of pHLIP-monomethyl auristatin E conjugates. Molecular pharmaceutics. 2015;12(4):1250-8.

O'Brien C, Cavet G, Pandita A, et al. Functional genomics identifies ABCC3 as a mediator of taxane resistance in HER2-amplified breast cancer. Cancer research. 2008;68(13):5380-9.

Chen R, Hou J, Newman E, et al. CD30 Downregulation, MMAE Resistance, and MDR1 Upregulation Are All Associated with Resistance to Brentuximab Vedotin. Molecular cancer therapeutics. 2015;14(6):1376-84.

Maderna A, Doroski M, Subramanyam C, et al. Discovery of cytotoxic dolastatin 10 analogues with N-terminal modifications. Journal of medicinal chemistry. 2014;57(24):10527-10543.

van de Donk NW, Dhimolea E. Brentuximab vedotin. mAbs. 2012;4(4):458-65.

Chari RV, Miller ML, Widdison WC. Antibody-drug conjugates: an emerging concept in cancer therapy. Angewandte Chemie. 2014;53(15):3796-827.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22037/nbm.v5i4.15221