Is Article 13 of “ Educational Directive for Gifted and Talented Students in Universities” a valid rule?

Sh Oveisgharan, M Ghasemi

Abstract


96

Background: Iranian talented university students who take semester averages below 17 for at most two times can't use facilities provided for Gifted and Talented students in Universities through Ministry of Health (MOH) directive regarding gifted and talented student.
Purpose: To examine the validity of article 13 of this directive.
Methods: Renzulli's three ring concept of giftedness was chosen as giftedness definition. Obtaining Grade Point Averages equal or more than 15 was regarded as "above average ability". A questionnaire, based on “Scales for Rating the Behavioural Characteristics of Superior Students” was designed for "creativity" and "task commitment" evaluation. Score 3.00 or more in "creativity" and "task commitment" evaluation was regarded to be sufficient to keep the student in the program. Students who were admitted in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences during 1997-1999 and recognized as gifted initially by MOH were included in our study.
Results: 147 students were included in this study, of which 50% were female. From the study group, 20 student reports, done by 39 students were evaluated. Of these 39 students, 31 would have been left out based on article. Out of 31 students, 18 met all three criteria of Renzulli's definition.
Conclusion: There may be gifted student who are denied the opportunity of using the facilities provided for gifted student based on enforcement of article 13 of IGCT directive. Further study to devise better measure for
identification of gifted student seems to be warranted.
Keywords: GIFTED, IDENTIFICATION, ISFAHAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

Keywords


GIFTED, IDENTIFICATION, ISFAHAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

Full Text:

PDF

53

References


- Mitchell BM, Williams WG. Education of the Gifted and Talented in the World Community. Phi Delta Kappan 1987; 68(7):531-534.

- Feng AX, Campbell JR, Vema MA. The talent development of American physics Olympians. Gifted and talented International 2001; XVI (2):108-114.

- Callahan CM, Hunsaker SL, Adams CM, Moore SD, Bland LC. Instruments used in the identification of gifted and talented students.

[online]. 1995 [cited 2001Aug]; Available from:URL : http://www.virginia.edu/

- Tallent-Runnels MK, Sigier EA. The status of the selection of gifted students with learning disabilities for gifted programs. Roeper Review

; 17(4):246-248.

- Renzulli JS. The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In Sternberg RJ, Davidson J. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1986. p. 53-92.

- Mariand S. Education of gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of education. Washington DC: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare Publication; 1972.(Vol.1).

-Gardner H. The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Ann Dyslexia 1987; 37:19-35.

- Educational Directive for Gifted and Talented Students in Iranian Universities. 1996.

-Oveisgharan S, Ghasemi M, Changiz T. Academic achievement of talented students at Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. IJME 2001; 1(2):13-6.

- Renzulli JS, Smith LH, White AJ, Callaban CM, Hartman RK. Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press, 1976.

- Orieux J, Yewchuk C. Correlates of creative performance in high school students. Can J Spec Educ 1990; 6(l):50-60.

- Renzulli JS. Gifted identification. Mansfield Center,CT: Creative learning press; 2002.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v3i2.864

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.