A survey of students' perspectives of open-book examinations in histology/embryology

Hamidreza Mahmoudzadeh Sagheb, Zahra Heidari, Mahdi Mohammadi



Background and purpose: An open-book exam permits the examinees to consult some specific selected reference sources or materials while answering the exam questions. This study focused on the students' perspectives of open-book examinations in the histology/embryology courses, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences (ZUMS), Zahedan, Iran.
Methods: The survey was conducted via a questionnaire after open-book examinations had been conducted in the histology and embryology courses, between 2009 and 2010. Of the 254 students who entered the new education system, 160 students were selected at random.
Results: The results revealed that 72% of the students preferred the open-book type to the closed-book kind of examinations. Most of the students voiced that this type of examination was more suited to test high cognitive learning skills and solving real life situation problems, involving less stress while preparing for and taking the exam. They also mentioned that their marks in these examinations were not higher than those from the closed-book examinations. The overall satisfaction scores of the students of the biological sciences were significantly (p<0.001) higher than those of the medical sciences students (16.28±4.17 vs. 12.65±5.16); in the government run university students it was significantly (P<0.001) higher than in the international university students (14.93±4.53 vs. 10.24±5.08); the embryology course results were significantly (p<0.001) higher than the histology course (15.23 ± 4.07 vs. 12.79±5.4) and among the MD students it was significantly (p<0.001) lower than those of the BSc students (12±5.1 vs. 15.93±4.29). There was a positive correlation between the scores they acquired in their course and the overall satisfaction scores with the open-book type of examinations (r=0.46, p value=0.01).
Conclusions: The finding of a positive response towards the open-book examination augurs well for extending such a type of examination to other subjects in our university.



Full Text:




Heijne-Penninga M, Kuks JBM, Schönrock-Adem J, Snijders TAB, Cohen-Schotanus J. Open-book tests to complement assessment-programmes: Analysis of open and closed-book tests. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2008;13(3):263-73.

Loi LS, Wu Y. Open book examination. 1998. http://www.ntu.edu.sg/nbs/sabre/working_papers/10-98.pdf

Tussing L. A consideration of the open book examination, Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1951;11:597–602.

Pauker JD. Effect of open book examinations on test performance in an undergraduate child psychology course. Teaching of Psychology. 1974;1(2):71-3.

Mohanan, K. P. Open Book Examination. 1997. http://www.cdtl.nus.sg/ publications/cdtllink/link2/obe

Francis J. A case for open-book examinations. Educational Review. 1982;34(1):13-26.

Feller M. Open-book testing and education for the future. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 1994;20(2):235-8.

Ioannidou MK. Testing and life-long learning: Open-book and closed-book examination in a university course, Studies in Educational Evaluation. 1997;23(2):131–9.

Chan M. An open and shut case? Taking books into examination- A Hong Kong study. Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE/WFEO International Colloquium.

Theophilides C, Dionysiou O. The major functions of the open book examination at the university level: A factor analytic study. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 1996;22(2):157-70.

Agarwal PK, Karpicke JD, Kang SHK, Roediger III HL, McDermott KB. Examining the testing effect with open- and closed-book tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2008;22(7):861-76.

Theophilides C, Koutselini M. Study behavior in the closed-book and the open-book examination: A comparative analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation. 2000;6(4):379-93.

Brightwell R, Daniel JH, Stewart A. Evaluation: is an open book examination easier? BEE-j. 2004; Volume 3. Available from: http://bio.ltsn.ac.uk/journal/voln/beej-3.3.htm

Krarup N, Naeraa N, Olsen C. Open- book tests in a university course. Higher Education. 1974;3:157-64.

Rakes GC. Open Book Testing in Online Learning Environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning. 2008;7(1). available from: www.ncolr.org/jiol

Boniface D. Candidates' use of notes and textbooks during an open book examination. Educational Research. 1985;27(3):201-9.

Olt M. Ethics and distance education: Strategies for minimizing academic dishonesty in

online assessment. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. 2002; 5(3). Available from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall53/olt53.html

Gupta MS. Open-book examinations for assessing higher cognitive abilities. IEEE Microwave Magazine. 2007;8(6):46-50.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v14i1.8158

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.