The effect of contextual factors on results of teaching evaluation in College of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (2003)

F Hossein Abadie

Abstract


194

Background: The use of students rating in order to improve faculty teaching has increased during last 25 years, and some universities rate all faculties teaching by students.
Purpose: To study the influence of some instructor contextual variables in evaluating faculty teaching such as, gender, age, rank, teaching experience and status of employment of faculty.
Methods: The available data from evaluation of 3 semesters (2001, 2002, and 2003) for 91 faculty members of medical basic sciences were analyzed as the dependent variables, the instrument for this study was self administered Likert's type questionnaire which administered in the last session of teaching. The effect of variable like gender, rank, teaching experiences, employment status are examined on evaluation score of faculty .The statistical t-test, Leven's and Pearson correlation were used to analyses the data.
Results: Of all participant 67% were men. 5.6%of them aged less than 35, 52.2% of subjects were between 35-50years old and 42.2%were older than 50. Of all faculties 16.6% were full professor, 23.4% associate and 56%were assistant professor.4% of the faculty were instructor. There was no statistical significant association between the mean score and variances of evaluation scores Conclusion: The finding of this study showed there were no statistically differences between the dependent and independents variables. However the weak negative correlation was found between age and teaching experience. It means young and less experienced faculty gets better score in student rating
KEYWORDS: FACULTY EVALUATION, STUDENT'S SURVEY

Keywords


FACULTY EVALUATION, STUDENT'S SURVEY

Full Text:

PDF

91

References


-Jacobs L. Have students ratings of college teaching valid: what Research has to say?[online] july 2003; Available from:URL: http: www. Indiana edu /~ best /

-Greenwald, A.G.,. Validity concerns and usefulness of student rating of instruction. Am Psych 1997; 52(11): 1182-6.

-Marsh, HW. The validity of student evaluations of teaching . Politic Scien Politics 1994; 27(3): 545-533

-Peterson , KD, Steven D. Ponzio Rc. Variable Data sources in teacher Evaluation. J Research Dev Edu 1998; 31(3): 123-132

-Roche,L.A. and Marsh ,H.W. The use of student’s evaluations and an individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness. Am Edu Research J 1993; 30(1):217-251.

-Marsh, H.W.and Roche,L.A. Making student’s Evaluation of teaching effectiveness: The critical Issue of validity, Bias and utility, Am Psych 1997; 52(11): 1187-97

-Cashin ,W.E.and DawneyR.G.Using gobal and specific rating of teaching effectiveness and their relation to course objectives. J Edu Psych 1992; 8 6(4): 649-57.

-Aleamoni, LM. Student rating of instruction. In: Millman J, editor. Handbook of teacher evaluation. Los Angeles,CA: Sage publication;

-154.

-Fledman, k.A. Class size and college student’s evaluations of teachers and courses. Research Higher Edu , 1984; 21(1): 45-116.

- Freeman, H.R.Student Evaluations of teachers and courses taught, instructor gender and gender role and student gender. J Edul Psych

; 86(4):627-30

- DeBerg CL.and Willson JR. An empirical investigation of the potential confounding variables in student evaluation of teaching. J of Account Edu 1992; 8 (1), 37-62.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v6i1.813

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.