A Study of Job Satisfaction and its Demographic Correlates of Faculty Members at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

Ali Keshtkaran



Background and purpose: Job satisfaction has been regarded as a product of harmony of one’s positive individual attitudes toward his/her work and the compatibility of the individual with his/her duties and with the working conditions governing the job .
Job satisfaction has shown to affect productivity rate, personal output and their psychosomatic presence The current study has been launched to investigate the faculty members, satisfaction with various components of their academic career, such as nature of work salary, promotion, relations
with the managers and colleagues.
Methods : To investigate the relationship between the individuals and various dimensions of job satisfaction, a standard self–administered questionnaire of J.D.I was distributed between 154 respondents. A total of 122 copies of the questionnaire were returned and analyzed.
Results : Distribution of the sample, on the basis of demographic variables of the participants were shown that, 82.1% of the subjects were men, 68.8% of them were over 45 years, 95.1% of the subjects were married, 82.8% of them were assistant professors and instructors and 60% of the subject were permanent official employees.
Conclusion: The highest and the second highest level of satisfaction with the nature of their work and their colleagues respectively, whereas they showed to be least satisfied with their salaries and promotion policies. Satisfaction with career increased as the faculty members promoted to higher academic rank (P< .05). Further analysis of the data revealed a statistically significant linear relationship between the following pairs of variables: age and promotion aspects, salary and overall satisfaction score, years of employment and amount of salary, academic rank and promotion variable.
Years of employment as a faculty member negatively correlated with all aspects of satisfaction. Also age was shown to be directly related to all dimensions of satisfaction (P< .05).



Full Text:




Dennett M D. The nature and causes of job satisfaction. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 1976.p. 1319-28.

Scarpello V, Campbell JP. Job satisfaction: are all the parts there? Personnel Psychology. 1983:

– 600.

Price J L , Mueller CW. Handbook of Organization Measurement. Marsh field: Patina; 1986.p. 223-27.

Katzell RA, Thompson DE, Guzzo RA: How job satisfaction and job performance are and are not linked. Job Satisfaction . New York: Lexington books; 1992. p.195- 217.

Wit L , Nye L: Cander and the relationship between perceived fairness of pay or promotion and gob satisfaction . J Appl Psych. 1992; 12: 710-17.

Alpert, M: The care and feeling of engineers Fortune. 1992; 21:86- 95.

Herzberg F, Mausner B: Snyder. Man: the Motivation to Work.New York: Wiley; 1959.

Robbins S P. Essentials of Organizational Behavior. Wine: Prentice Hall; 2004.

Ostroff C. The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance and Organizational level Analysis. J Appl Psych. 1992;963 – 74.

Robbins S P. Concepts Controversies and Applications. 8thed. Upper saddle River: N J:Prentice Hall; 1998.

Terry C S: The Sepaction and Job Satisfaction Magazine. E U C psycho MEAS 1991.

Hackman J R, Oldhan CR: Motivation Through the Design of work test of a theory organizational dynamics. Reading, Mass: Addison- Wesley; 1980. p. 250 – 70.

Sashkin M: Participative Management Is On Ethical Imperative Organizational Dynamics;


Adams J: Inequity in social exchanges. In: Berkowitz L: Advances In Experimental Social Psychology: New York, 1965. p. 267- 300

Vroom V H: Expectancy theory as a predictor of work behavior and attitudes: are – evaluation of empirical evidence. Decision Sciences. 1974: 481–506.

Eagly A H, Makhijani, M.G Klonsky B G. Gender and the evaluation of leaders: a meta – analysis. Psychological Bulletin.1992: 3 -22.

Bedeian A G, Ferris CR, Kamar KM. Age tenure and Job satisfaction a tale of two perspectives. J Vocational Behavior 1992; 1: 33- 48.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v8i2.740

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.