Do Interns Achieve Learning Outcomes up to Faculty Members’ Expectations?

Vahid Ashoorion, M Emadoleslam, M Sabri, B Shams

Abstract


209

Background and Purpose: In an era of increasing professional accountability, there is a need for both medical educators and licensing bodies to identify the exit competencies expected from medical graduates. Pediatrics department of Isfahan University of medical sciences has defined learning outcomes that should be achieved in pediatric ambulatory setting and both learners and teachers were informed about these outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare faculties’ expectation and interns’ self-assessment about their achievement of learning outcomes at pediatric out-patient clinics.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study conducted in October and November 2005 a list of 63 learning outcomes was prepared. In the first phase, all faculty members were asked to specify desired level of achievement on 0-3 analogue scale for each outcome. In second phase, interns were acquired to self

evaluate their level of achievement in these competencies based on the above scale.

Results: In this study 53 interns and 6 faculty members participated. Interns were expected to be fully competent with respect to eleven learning outcomes. There was a significant difference between faculties’ expectations and interns’ self assessment in 6 of full competency requiring outcomes and in 13 of high competency requiring outcomes.

Conclusion: Interns’ achievement seems unsatisfactory regarding outcomes requiring full and high competency achievement and pediatrics department can revised its curriculum based on the results of this study and improve teaching and learning in the outpatient services.

Key words: EDUCATION, AMBULATORY PATIENT CARE, LEARNING OBJECTIVE, PEDIATRICS


Keywords


EDUCATION, AMBULATORY PATIENT CARE, LEARNING OBJECTIVE, PEDIATRICS

Full Text:

PDF

40

References


Katz M, Urkin J, Bar-David Y, Cohen AH, Warshawsky S, Barak N. Child health care centres: an academic model for comprehensive child health care in the community. Child: Care, Health and Development 2005; 31(2):217-222.

Learning objectives for medical student education-guidelines for medical schools: report I of the Medical School Objectives Project. Acad Med 1999; 74(1):13-18.

Weston-Eborn R, Sitzman K. Creating effective learning objectives. Home Healthc Nurse 2004; 22(11):753.

Henry M, Dale DW. Conceptual Guidelines for Developing and Maintaining Curriculum and Examination Objectives: The Experience of the

Medical Council of Canada. Acad Med 2000; 75(10):1031-1037.

McLaughlin K, Coderre S, Woloschuk W, Lim T, Muruve D, Mandin H. The influence of objectives, learning experiences and examination blueprint on medical students’ examination preparation. BMC Med Educ 2005; 5:39.

Dolcourt JL ZG. Unanticipated learning outcomes associated with commitment to change in continuing medical education. J Contin Educ

Health Prof 2003; 23(3):173-181.

Barrett DA. Learning objectives in resident training. Objectives in clinical chemistry. Am J Clin Pathol 20061; 65(6):1026-1029.

Rapp DE, Lyon MB, Orvieto MA, Zagaja GP. The core learning objectives education model: an approach to the teaching of core concepts in the clinical clerkship. Can J Urol 2005; 12(5):2849-2855.

Foulds DM, Sterling R, Wood PR, Sterling J, Littlefield JH. The current place of learning objectives in paediatrics. Med Educ 1989; 23(5):407-408.

Olson AL, Woodhead J, Berkow R, Kaufman NM, Marshall SG. A National General Pediatric Clerkship Curriculum: The Process of

Development and Implementation. Pediatrics 2000; 106(1):216-222.

Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA 2006; 296(9):1094-1102.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v10i1.716

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.