A Survey of Medical Interns’ Viewpoints on Feedback in Internal, Surgery, Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology wards at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

leila bazrafkan, M Amini, A Mahbudi, M Poormalek Lahigi

Abstract


203

Background: Assessment forms the backbone of undergraduate medical training especially in clinical contexts and clerkships, which are typically situated in environments lacking educational structure. This study aims to evaluate the viewpoints of medical interns in internal medicine, surgery, pediatrics and obstetrics and gynecology wards about feedback and formative assessment.
Methods: 100 medical interns attending internal medicine, surgery, pediatrics and obstetrics and gynecology wards comprised the subjects of the study. They filled out a questionnaire containing 20 items on formative assessment. The data obtained were analyzed, using SPSS version 14.
Results: Among the wards studied the obstetrics & gynecology achieved the highest score and the surgery ward the lowest. The difference between the scores was statistically significant (P = 0.007)
Conclusion: The highest score to formative assessment in the obstetrics & gynecology ward reveals the students’ more positive viewpoints on formative assessment in this ward in comparison to the other three
major wards. The surgery ward received the lowest score suggesting that the feedback in surgery ward was very low.
Keywords: FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT, FEEDBACK, MEDICAL INTERNS, SHIRAZ MEDICAL SCHOOL, POINT OF

Keywords


FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT, FEEDBACK, MEDICAL INTERNS, SHIRAZ MEDICAL SCHOOL, POINT OF

Full Text:

PDF

70

References


Crooks T. The Validity of Formative Assessments. British Educational Research Association Annual Conference; 2002 Sep 13- 15; Leeds, UK. New York: Springer; 2002.

Cowie B, Bell B. A model of formative assessment in science education. Assess Edu 1999;6(2): 101-16.

Nicol DJ, Macfarlane-Dick D. Formative assessment and self regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud High Edu 2006;31(2):199-218.

Stroup WM, Ares N, Hurford AC. Taxonomy of generative activity design supported by next generation classroom networks. Phi Delta Kappan 2004; 120(8): 189-32.

Lesh R, Hoover M, Hole B, Kelly E, Post T. Principles for developing thoughtrevealing activities for students and teachers. In: AE Kelly, RA Lesh, editors. Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. New York: McGraw Hill; 2002. p. 128-223.

Wang TH. What strategies are effective for formative assessment in an e-learning environment? J Compu Assiss Learn 2007; 23(3): 171– 186.

Korszun A, Winterburn PJ, Sweetland H, Tapper-Jones L, Houston H. Assessment of professional attitude and conduct in medical undergraduates. Med Teach. 2005;27(8):704- 8.

Krasne S, Wimmers PF, Relan A, Drake TA. Differential effects of two types of formative assessment in predicting performance of first year medical students. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract.

;11(2):155-71.

Carrillo-de-la-Peña MT, Baillès E, Caseras X, Martínez A, Ortet G, Pérez J. Formative assessment and academic achievement in pregraduate students of health sciences. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007 Oct 31 [Epub ahead of print].

Hudson JN, Bristow DR. Formative assessment can be fun as well as educational. Adv Physiol Educ. 2006;30(1):33-7.

Sicaja M, Romić D, Prka Z. Medical students' clinical skills do not match their teachers' expectations: survey at Zagreb University School of Medicine, Croatia. Croat Med J. 2006;47(1):169-75.

Lewis DJ, Sewell RD. Providing formative feedback from a summative computer-aided assessment. Am J Pharm Educ. 2007;71(2):33.

Kibble J. Use of unsupervised online quizzes as formative assessment in a medical physiology course: effects of incentives on student participation and performance. Adv Physiol Educ. 2007;31(3):253-60.

Henly DC. Use of Web-based formative assessment to support student learning in a

metabolism/nutrition unit. Eur J Dent Educ. 2003;7(3):116-22.

Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Duffy FD, Fortna GS. The Mini-CEX: A method of assessing clinical skills. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138(45): 476-81.

Mcleod PJ, Meagher TW. Educational benefits of blinding students to information acquired and management plans generated by other physicians. Medical Teacher 2001; 23(2): 83-85

Kassebaum DG, Eaglen RH. Shortcomings in the evaluation of students' clinical skills and behaviors in medical school. Acad Med. 1999;74(7):842-9.

Elnicki DM, Kolarik R, Bardella I. Thirdyear medical students' perceptions of effective teaching behaviors in a multidisciplinary ambulatory clerkship. Acad Med. 2003;78(8):815-9.

Elawar MC, Corno L. A factorial experiment in teachers' written feedback on student homework: Changing teacher behavior a little rather than a lot. J Edu Psy 1985; 77(2): 162-173.

Angelo TA, Cross KP. Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1993.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v13i3.4513

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.