Interdisciplinarity; Out of Semantic Confusion in Iran

Shahram Yazdani, Maryam Hajiahmadi, Sareh Shakerian

Abstract


62

Background: The concept of interdisciplinarity that we recognize today, was initially formed in 1920 in the United States. During this period, the United States Social Science Research Council expressed its interest in interdisciplinary research. Interdisciplinarity is a multidimensional word with various meanings and interpretations. It is considered as the newest unknown critical, educational, and organizational concept in the modern academic environment. In this study, we defined interdisciplinarity and the characteristics of the underlying concepts to present an analytical definition of the concept of interdisciplinarity.
Methods: Walker and Avant’s concept analysis method was used. This method is a systematic approach often used for analyzing relatively new concepts. In order to obtain and extract the applications of interdisciplinarity and its defining characteristics, we searched different databases and used keywords.
Five main domains that form the defining structure of interdisciplinarity were emerged. Those domains include nature, integration, method, goal, and levels of interdisciplinarity.
Results: We identified five domains major of “ interdisciplinarity: “nature,” “integration”, “method”, “goal”, and “levels” of interdisciplinarity. Based on the defining attributes a definition is formulated for the concept of interdisciplinarity.
Conclusion: This study, achieving a simple and elegant concept, resolved the differences between the different perspectives in this field and helped us design the theoretical and practical model.
Keywords: DEFINITION, CONCEPT ANALYSIS, INTERDISCIPLINARITY, WALKER AND AVANT’S METHOD

Keywords


DEFINITION, CONCEPT ANALYSIS, INTERDISCIPLINARITY, WALKER AND AVANT’S METHOD

Full Text:

PDF

28

References


McEwen L, Jennings R, Duck R, Roberts H. Students’ experiences of interdisciplinary Masters’ courses. Southampton: The Interdisciplinary Teaching and Learning Group, Subject Centre for Languages,Linguistics and Area Studies, School of Humanities, University of Southampton; 2009.

Klein JT. Creating interdisciplinary campus cultures: A model for strength and sustainability. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.

Klein JT. Interdisciplinarity: history, theory, and practice. Midtown Detroit: Wayne State University Press; 1990.

Liu A. The power of formalism: The new historicism. ELH. 1989;56:721-71. Doi: 10.2307/2873158

Walker LO, Avant KC. Strategies for theory construction in nursing. New Jersey: Pearson/Prentice Hall; 2005.

Fuchsman K. Rethinking integration in interdisciplinary studies. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies. 2009;27:70-85.

Razzaq J, Townsend T, Pisapia J. Towards an understanding of interdisciplinarity: The case of a British University. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies. 2013;31:149-73.

Little D. Beyond positivism: Toward a methodological pluralism for the social sciences. Michigan: University of Michigan; 2004.

Holley KA. Understanding interdisciplinary challenges and opportunities in higher education. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley; 2009.

Newell WH. A theory of interdisciplinary studies. Issues in integrative studies. 2001;19:1-25.

Klein JT. A platform for a shared discourse of interdisciplinary education. JSSE. 2006;5:10-8.

Lattuca LR. Creating interdisciplinarity: Grounded definitions from college and university faculty. History of Intellectual Culture. 2003;3:1-20.

Schmidt JC. Towards a philosophy of interdisciplinarity. Poiesis Prax.2008;5(1):53-69. Doi: 10.1007/s10202-007-0037-8

Floridi L. Is semantic information meaningful data? Philos Phenomenol Res.2005;70(2):351-70. Doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2005.tb00531.x

Chettiparamb A. Interdisciplinarity: a literature review. Southampton: HEA Interdisciplinary Teaching and Learning Group, Centre for Languages, Linguistics and Area Studies, University

of Southampton; 2007.

Cai S. The age of synthesis: From cognitive science to converging technologies and hereafter. Chin Sci Bull. 2011;56(6):465-75. Doi: 10.1007/s11434-010-4005-7

Berlin A, Cunska Z, Holler MJ, Japiņa G, Jouhette S, King RM, et al. Interdisciplinarity in social sciences: Does it provide answers to current challenges in higher education and research? Riga: University of Latvia Press; 2011.

Moore G. (Re)defining interdisciplinarity: (Re)forming universities. Loughborough: Interrogations Conference Committee, DeMontfort University, Faculty of Art and Design and Loughborough University, School of Art and Design; 2009.

Meleis AI. Theoretical nursing: Development and progress. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.

Miller TR, Baird TD, Littlefield CM, Kofinas G, Chapin ES, Redman CL. Epistemological pluralism: reorganizing interdisciplinary research. Ecol Soc. 2008;13(2):46. Doi: 10.5751/es-02671-130246

Szostak R. Extensional definition of interdisciplinarity. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies. 2015;33:94-116.

Newell WH. Six arguments for agreeing on a definition of interdisciplinary studies. AIS Newsletter. 2007;29:1-4.

Klein JT. Enhancing communication & collaboration in interdisciplinary research. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications; 2013.

Shah C. Toward collaborative information seeking (CIS). arXiv preprint arXiv:09080709.

Tress B, Tres G, Fry G, Opdam P. Defining concepts and the process of knowledge production in integrative research. From landscape research to landscape planning: Aspects of integration, education and application. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media; 2005.

Wodak R, Meyer M. Methods for critical discourse analysis. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE; 2009.

Khorsandi Taskooh A. Variety of typologies in interdisciplinary education. QJRISH. 2009;1:57-83.

Klein JT. Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: a literature review. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2Suppl):S116-23. Doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.010

McCallin AM. Pluralistic dialogue: A grounded theory of interdisciplinary practice. Australian J Rehabilit Counsel. 1999;5:78-85. Doi: 10.1017/s1323892200001083

Beaney M. Putting analysis rightfully back into analytic philosophy. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy. 2011;30(1):87-94.

Borgatti SP, Foster PC. The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. J Manage. 2003;29(6):991-1013. Doi: 10.1016/s0149-2063_03_00087-4

Bingham NE. Integrating interdisciplinary organizations: A preliminary directory for networking. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies. 1990;8:111-31.

Stock P, Burton RJF. Defining terms for integrated (multi-inter-trans-disciplinary) sustainability research. Sustainability. 2011;3:1090-113. Doi: 10.3390/su3081090

Jahn T, Bergmann M, Keil F. Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecol Econ. 2012;79:1-10. Doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.017

McKenna H. Nursing theories and models. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge; 2006.

Rubio DM, Schoenbaum EE, Lee LS, Schteingart DE, Marantz PR, Anderson KE, et al. Defining translational research: implications for training. Acad Med. 2010;85(3):470-5. Doi: 10.1097/acm.0b013e3181ccd618




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v18i1.25499

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.