Developing a Model of Tuition Fee Calculation for Universities of Medical Sciences

Seyed Amir Mohsen Ziaee, Mehdi Mohammadzadeh, Faranak Salmannejad, Tayebeh Ghari

Abstract


203

Background: The aim of our study was to introduce and evaluate a practicable model for tuition fee calculation of each medical field in universities of medical sciences in Iran.
Methods: Fifty experts in 11 panels were interviewed to identify variables that affect tuition fee calculation. This led to key points including total budgets, expenses of the universities, different fields’ attractiveness, universities’ attractiveness, and education quality. Tuition fees were calculated for different levels of education, such as post-diploma, Bachelor, Master, and Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D) degrees, Medical specialty, and Fellowship. After tuition fee calculation, the model was tested during 2013-2015. Since then, a questionnaire including 20 questions was prepared. All Universities’ financial and educational managers were asked to respond to the questions regarding the model’s reliability and effectiveness.
Results: According to the results, fields’ attractiveness, universities’ attractiveness, zone distinction and education quality were selected as effective variables for tuition fee calculation. In this model, tuition fees per student were calculated for the year 2013, and, therefore, the inflation rate of the same year was used. Testing of the model showed that there is a 92% of satisfaction. This model is used by medical science universities in Iran.
Conclusion: Education quality, zone coefficient, fields’ attractiveness, universities’ attractiveness, inflation rate, and portion of each level of education were the most important variables affecting tuition fee calculation.
Keywords: TUITION FEES, FIELD’S ATTRACTIVENESS, UNIVERSITIES’ ATTRACTIVENESS, ZONE DISTINCTION, EDUCATION QUALITY

Keywords


TUITION FEES, FIELD’S ATTRACTIVENESS, UNIVERSITIES’ ATTRACTIVENESS, ZONE DISTINCTION, EDUCATION QUALITY

Full Text:

PDF

220

References


History of Iran’s ministry of health and medical education; 2016. Available from: http://www.behdasht.gov.ir/page /%D8%A2%D8%B4%D9%86%D8%A7%DB%8C%DB%8C+%D8%A8%D8%A7+%D9%88%D8%B2%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%AA%D8%AE%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%87

Islamic parliament of Iran. “Assessment and admissions in universities and centers of higher education”. 2013. No.38485/234. Available from: http://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/print_version/865812

Islamic parliament of Iran. “The provision of education facilities for children and youth of Iran”, with subsequent amendments, article 7 and 8. 1979. Available from: http://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/print_version/98324

Statistical center of Iran. The number of students based on gender and field of education for the academic year 2014-2015. 2016. Available from: https://www.amar.org.ir/english/Statistics-by-Topic/Education-and-Research

Bruckmeier K, Wigger BU. The effects of tuition fees on transition from high school to university in Germany. Econ Educ Rev 2014; 41:14-23.

Sá F. The Effect of Tuition Fees on University Applications and Attendance: Evidence from the UK. Bonn: The Institute for the Study of Labor. 2014; No.: 8346.

Karay Y, Matthes J. A study on effects of and stance over tuition fees. GMS J Med Educ 2016; 33(1): Doc 6.

Mizutani F, Nakayama N, Tanaka T. Determinants of university tuition in Japan. Graduate school of business administration: Kobe University. 2015-08. Available from: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0 a h U K E w j 5 z M i 9 g K z X A hWr L s A K H Z J F D OMQFg g k M A A& u rl=

http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lib.kobeu.ac. jp%2Frepository%2F81008887.pdf&usg =AOvVaw22vIZoT8ux 1RXugUDwo_J9

Harford JD, Marcus RD. Tuition and U.S. private college characteristics: The hedonic approach. Econ Educ Rev 1986; 5(4): 415-30.

Yonezawa A. Cross-sectional analysis on tuition at the private universities in Japan: positive research on the economic behavior of Japan’s private universities. Kyoikugabu Kiyo 1994; 34: 149-62.

Urata H. The determinants of tuition and fees of Japanese private universities. The Journal Of Educational Sociology 1998; 63: 119-36.

Koshal RK, Koshal M. Determinants of tuition at comprehensive. Appl Econ 1998; 30(5): 579-83.

Dimkpah YO, Eseonu MO, Akpom UN. The impact of college quality on tuition: A hedonic analysis. Journal for Economic Educators 2004; 4(2):1-7.

Funabashi S. Empirical analysis of determinants of private university tuitions. Econ Sci 2008; 55(4):71-89.

Maruyama F. A study of the determinants of private university tuition in japan. Res High Educ 1991; 20:267-80.

Elliott C, Soo KT. The international market for MBA qualifications: The relationship between tuition fees and applications. Econ Educ Rev 2013; 34: 162-74.

Koshal RK, Koshal M. State Appropriation and Higher Education Tuition: What is the relationship? Educ Econ 2000; 8(1): 81-9.

Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Economic statistic. 2016. Available from: http://www.cbi.ir/simplelist/1421.aspx




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v16i3.17109

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.