Educational Problems of Kermanshah Medical School: View Points of Students, Graduates and Faculty Members

  • Soraia Siabani Genral practitioner, Kermanshah university of medical sciences
  • MR Moradi professor, kermanshah university of medical sciences
  • H Siabani Genral practitioner, Kermanshah university of medical sciences
  • K Amolaei Lecturer, kermanshah university of medical sciences
  • SA Siabani Medical student, Shahid Beheshty university of medical sciences
Keywords: Staff Member, Graduateds, Undergraduats, Problems, Medical School


Background and purpose: In recent years although the number of students registering for medicines has decreased in Kermanshah University of Medical sciences parallel to other universities of medical sciences the quality of educational services has not improved the informal reports suggests that the competency of medical graduates is not satisfactory Since any intervention needs situation analysis this study was conducted to obtain viewpoints of three main groups of stockholders including faculty members, students and graduates on medical school problems and insufficiencies.
Methods: In this qualitative study faculty members of medical schools, medical graduated of 2005-6, and medical students of different phases participated. With participation of these subjects Focus Group Discussion (FGD) sessions were carried out. The goals of the projects were first explained for participants. In the end of each discussion session the discussions were careful transcribed. The sessions continued till the sessions get saturated. The transcript of discussion was thoroughly reviewed by researchers and codified. The problems were classified in 7 areas of management, planning, education goals, evaluation, ethics, teaching, and students.
Results: The subjects believed that the most important problems in Kermanshah medical school include neglecting the student evaluation, no educational objectives or being inattentive to them, unwanted effects of pay for service plan, too much duties for interns (students), overload of medical duties and insufficiency in the number of faculty members, no rewarding system for teachers, inattention to needed outcomes, shortage of facilities for student in hospital and being negligent about mutual respect between students and teachers.
Conclusion: some of the problems such as the effects of pay for service plan and insufficiency in the number of faculty members have solutions stemming beyond the university at Ministry of Health level, however, most problems are local, therefore, if the directors pay more attention regarding planning, allocation and management, we can see quality improvement in medical education in Kermanshah medical school.
Key word: Staff Member, Graduateds, Undergraduats, Problems , Medical School


Malekafzali H, Shadpoor K. Skills and work problems of health center physicians. Teh¬

Educational ran: Ministry of Health and Medical Education Publication;1994. p.42

Mohammadi N,Rafifar Sh, Aghamolai T, Akbari M, Aminshakoori F, Ayar S. Health education. 1st ed. Tehran: Ministry of Health and Medical Edu¬cation Publication;2006. p.19,20,429

Lamei A. Total quality management for educa¬tion. National Committee for Quality Improve-ment. Tehran: Ministry of Health and Medical Education Publication;2000. p.62

Williamson JW, German PS, Weiiss R, Ski¬ner EA, Bowes F. Health science information and continuig education of physicians: A survey of U.S. primary care practitioners and the Ann intern Med. 1989 Jan 15; 110(2): 151-60

Page G, Bates J, Dyer SM, Vincent DR, Bord¬age G, Jacques A.physician-assessment and phy-sician-enhancment programs in Canada. CMAJ 1995;153(12):1723-8

Kasraian L, Sadeghi Hassanabadi A. Know¬eledge of physicians working in Shiraz health cen¬ters. Isfahan J Edu Dev Cent 1994; 4;12-7

.Saboori M ,Sabri M, Ebrahimi A, Avijgan M, Toghianifar N. Clinical education possess and necessity for change. Step Dev Med Edu 2006;1(Suppl1):45.

Yazdanpanah K, Pooladi A, Bahram Rezaie M, Abedi F, Molaie A. the need for change based on students and faculties views. Step Dev Med Edu 2006;1(Suppl1):45.

Estaghamati A. Essential intervention for edu¬cation quality improvement. J Edu Dev Cent Min¬istr Health 2001;1:12.

Shokoohi F, MAhboobi A, Asghari N. A survey of medical externs on evaluation prac¬tices in clinical courses Step Dev Med Edu 2006;1(Suppl1):55.

Shamshiri M. The factors of educational failure of hamedan university students. J Yazd Univ Med Sci 2009; 5:21.

Adib M. the problems of educational assess¬ment in Kashan university of medical sciences. Step Dev Med Edu 2006;1(Suppl1):35

- Jain S. Orienting Family medicine residents and medical students to office practice. Family Med 2005; 37,641-643

MohMMdi A, Mojtahedzadeh R,Enzevaei A. Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Clinical Education in Medical Schools of Iran. Journal of Med¬ical Education, fall 2006, Vol 10, No.1, PP: 27-31

Ghaderi R, Dastjerdi R. Teachers and students View point about the characteristics of Effective teaching. Journal of Medical Education, summer 2005, Vol 7, No.2, PP: 95-102

wentzel K.Student motivation in middle school: the role of pedagogical caring. Journal Edu Psych; 1996.pp:9-10

Original (Research) Articles