A Comparison of the Learning Outcomes of Traditional Lecturing with that of Computer-Based Learning in two Optometry Courses

H Kangari, A Alipour, SM Tabatabaee



Background and purpose: The literature on distance education has provided different reports about the effectiveness of traditional lecture based settings versus computer based study settings. This study
is an attempt to compare the learning outcomes of the traditional lecture based teaching with that of the computer based learning in the optometry curriculum.
Methods: Two courses in the optometry curriculum, Optometry I, with 24 students and Optometry II, with 27 students were used in this study. In each course, the students were randomly divided into two groups. In each scheduled class session, one group randomly attended the lecture, while the other studied in the computer stations. The same content was presented to both groups and at end of each session the same quiz was given to both. In the next session, the groups switched place. This process
continued for four weeks. The quizzes were scored and a paired t-test was used to examine any difference. The data was analyzed by SPSS 15 software.
Results: The mean score for Optometry I, lecture settings was 3.36 +0.59, for Optometry I computer based study was 3.27+0.63 , for Optometry II, in lecture setting was 3.22+0.57 and for Optometry II, computer based setting was 2.85+0.69. The paired sample t-test was performed on the scores, revealing no statistical significant difference between the two settings. However, the mean score for lecture sessions was slightly higher in lecture settings.
Conclusion: Since this study reveals that the learning outcomes in traditional lecture based settings and computer based study are not significantly different, the lecture sessions can be safely replaced
by the computer based study session. Further practice in the computer based setting might reveal better outcomes in computer study settings.



Full Text:




Why lecture? [online]. [cited 2007 July 25]; Available from: URL: http://www.flinders.edu.au/teach/t4l/teaching/lecturing.php

Bridge W. Self-study courses in undergraduate science teaching. Higher Education 1976; 5: 211-24.

Sahin CS. Overcoming the “No Significant Difference” phenomenon in distance education by internet. No Signific Differ Phenomenon [serial online] 2006 [cited 2007 January 20]; Available from: URL: http://www.nosignificantdifference.org/search.asp

Koskela M, Kiltti P, Vilpola I, Tervonen J. Suitability of a virtual learning environment for higher education. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning [serial online] 2005[cited 2007 July 20]; 3(1):21-30. Available from: URL: www.ejel.org

Shachar M, Neumann Y. Differences between traditional and distance education academic performances: A meta-analytic approach. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning [Online]. 2003

Octobe [cited 2007 July 20]; Available from: URL: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/

view/153/704 6. The effectiveness of computer-mediated instruction in a Greek State Lykeio comparing CALL learning outcomes with the outcomes of traditional teaching. 2002 [cited 2007 July 25]; Available from: URL: http://users.att.sch.gr/hartzoulakis/Dissertation.pdf

Wadsworth N, Wood WB, Ojano-Sheehan O, McMullen J. A comparison of learning outcomes between a traditional face-to-face lecture-based teaching method and an independent study method in a law and medicine course.[online] 2007 June 27 [cited 2007 July 25]; Available from: URL:http://www.aacom.org/events/annualmtg/2007/Posters/Wadsworth_Law.pdf.White SJ. Okojie M. The impact of computerassisted instruction on students’ achievement in introductory computer applications courses at a predominately African-American university. Doctoral Thesis [n online] 2006 [cited 2007 January 20]; Available from: URL: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1269437&

coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE&CFID=32870762 &CFTOKEN=35682779#

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v11i3&4.1035

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.