• Logo
  • SBMUJournals

Comparative Study of the Shear Bond Strength of Flowable Composite in Permanent Teeth Treated with Conventional Bur and Contact or Non-Contact Er:YAG Laser

Parisa Parhami, Seyed Jalal Pourhashemi, Mehdi Ghandehari, Ghasem Mighani, Ghasem Mighani, Nasim Chiniforush, Nasim Chiniforush




Introduction:The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the in vitro effect of the Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Er:YAG) laser with different radiation distances and high-speed rotary treatment on the shear bond strength of flowable composite to enamel of human permanent posterior teeth .

Methods : freshly extracted human molar teeth with no caries or other surface defects were used in this study (n=45). The teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups. Group 1: treated with non-contact Er:YAG Laser and etched with Er:YAG laser, Group 2: treated with contact Er:YAG Laser and etched with Er:YAG laser, Group 3 (control): treated with diamond fissure bur and etched with acid phosphoric 37 % . Then the adhesive was applied on the surafces of the teeth and polymerized using a curing light appliance. Resin cylinders were fabricated from flowable composite. Shear bond strength was tested at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min.

Results: The amount of Shear Bond Strength (SBS) in the 3 treatment groups was not the same (P<0.05).The group in which enamel surfaces were treated with diamond fissure bur and etched with acid (conrtol group) had the highest mean shear bond strength (19.92±4.76) and the group in which the enamel surfaces were treated with contact Er:YAG laser and etched with Er:YAG laser had the lowest mean shear bond strength (10.89±2.89). Mann-whitney test with adjusted P-value detected significant difference in shear bond strength between the control group and the other 2 groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: It was concluded that both contact and non-contact Er:YAG laser treatment reduced shear bond strength of flowable resin composite to enamel in comparison with conventional treatment with high speed rotary. Different Er:YAG laser distance irradiations did not influence the shear bond strength of flowable composite to enamel.


Er YAG lasers; flowable composite ; enamel


Bagramian RA, Garcia-Godoy F, Volpe AR. The global increase in dental caries: a pending public crisis. Am J Dent 2009; 22:38.

Antunes LA, Pedro RL, Vieira AS, Maia LC. Effectiveness of high speed instrument air abrasion on different dental subtracts .Braz Oral Res 2008; 22:235-41.

Buonocre MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1995; 34:849-53.

.Keller U, Hibst R, Geurtsen W, Schlike R, Heidemann D, Klaiber B, et al. Erbium-YAG laser application in caries therapy . Evaluation of patient perception and acceptance. J Dent 1998; 26(8):649–56.

Fornaini C, Riceputi D, Lupi-Pegurier L, Rocca JP. Patient responses to Er:YAG laser when used for conservative dentistry . Lasers Med Sci 2012; 27(6):1143-9.

Bohari MR, Chunawalla YK, Ahmed BM. Clinical evaluation of caries removal in primary teeth using conventional, chemomechanical and laser technique: an in vivo study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012; 13(1):40–7.

De Moor RJG, Delmé KIM. Laser assisted cavity preparation and adhesion to erbium-lased tooth structure. Part 1. J Adhes Dent 2010; 11: 427-38.

Bader C, Krejci I. Indications and limitations of Er;YAG laser applications in dentistry . Am J Dent 2006; 19:178-86.

Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Yamada Y, Kimura Y, Matsumoto K, Matsumoto N. Effects of Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation in human enamel and dentin . J Clin Laser Med Surg 1999; 17:105-9.

Hibst R, Keller U, Steiner R. The effects of pulsed Er;YAG laser irradiation on dental tissue . Laser Med Surg 1998; 4:163-5.

Zharikov EV, Zhekvo VI, Kulesvskii LR, Murina, TM, Osiko, V.V. Stimulated emission from Er3C ions in Yttrium aluminum garnet crystals at lZ2.94 mg. Soviet J Quantum Electron 1975; 4:1039–40.

Visuri SR, Gilbert JL, Wright DD, Wigdor HA, Walsh JT Jr. Shear strength of composite bonded to Er;YAG laser-prepared dentin . J Dent Res 1996; 75:599-605.

Kumazaki M. Removal of hard dental tissue (cavity preparation) with Er;YAG laser . In 6th international congress on lasers in dentistry. Proceedings 1998; Hawaii. 12-5.

Sirirungrojying S, Hayakawa T, Saito K, Meguro D, Nemoto K, Kasai K. Bonding durability between orthodontic brackets and human enamel treated with Megabond self-etching primer using 4-META/MMA –TBB resin cement . Dent Mater J 2004; 23:251-7.

Hayakawa T, Fukushima T, Nemoto K. Tensile bond strength of 4-META/MMA-TBB resin to ground bovine enamel using a self-etching primer. Dent Mater J 2004; 23:271-7.

Yokomichi R, Taira Y, Soeno K, Atsuta M. Influence of acid-base conditioning of the bond strength of five luting agents employing self-etching primer to enamel and dentin . Dent Mater J 2005; 24:232-7.

Cao L, Geerts S, Gueders A, Albert A, Seidel L, Carpentier J. Experimental comparison of cavity sealing ability of five dental adhesive systems after thermo-cycling . J Adhes Dent 2003; 5:139-44.

Atash R, Van den Abbeele. A Bond strengths of eight contemporary adhesives to enamel to dentin: An in vitro study on bovine primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent 2005;15:264-3.

Nara Y, Nagakura Y, Ito Y, Suzuki T, Kizuki I, Kimishima T, et al. Tensile bond strength of all-in-one self-etch adhesive system to cervical abrasion lesion dentin. J Dent Res 2003; 81: B-55.

Sakakibara Y, Ishimaru K, Takamizu M. A study on bond

Strength to dentin irradiated be Erbium:YAG laser. Jpn J Conservative Dent 1998; 41:207–19.

Armengol V, Jean A, Rohanizadeh R, Hamel H. Scanning

Electron microscopic analysis of diseased and healthy dental hard tissues after Er:YAG laser irradiation: in vitro study. J Endod 1999; 25(8):543–6.

Pelagalli J, Gimble CB, Hansen RT, Swett A, Win II DN. Investigational study of the use of Er:YAG laser versus dental drill for caries removal and cavity preparation—phase 1. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1997; 15(3):109–15.

William J. Dunn, John T. Davis, Anneke C.Bush. Shear bond strength and SEM evaluation of composite bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin and enamel . Dent Mater 2005; 21:616–24.

Martínez-Insua A, da Silva Dominguez L, Guitian Rivera F, Santana-Penin UA. Differences in bonding to acid-etched or Er:YAG-laser-treated enamel and dentin surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84:280–8.

Yazici A.R, Agarwal I, Campillo-Funollet M,Munoz-Viveros C, A. Antonson S, E. Antonson D, et al. Effect of laser preparation on bond strength of a self-adhesive flowable resin. Lasers Med Sci 2013; 28:343–7.

Jafari A, Shahabi S, Chiniforush N, Shariat A. Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer to Enamel in Bur-Prepared or Lased Teeth (Er: YAG). J Dent (Tehran) 2013; 10(2):119-23.

Barcellos DC , Borges AB , Goncalves S , Pavanello MB , Souza AC , Gomes Torres C . Influence of Er;YAG laser on shear bond strength of self-etching adhesives to Bovine enamel : In vitro study . World J Dent 2011 ; 2(1):11-5.

Simonsen RJ. Preventive resin restora- tions. Quintessence Int 1978; 9:69-76.

Simonsen RJ, Landy NA. Preventive resin restorations: fracture resistance and 7 year clinical results. J Dent Res 1984 ;( Special Issue) 63:175, abstract no. 39.

Moon PC, Tabassian, Culbreath TE. Flow characteristics and film thickness flowable resin composites. Oper Dent 2002; 27:248-53.

Strassler HE, Goodman HS. A durable flowable composite resin for preventive resin restorations. Dent Today 2002; 21:116-21.

Gurgan S, Kiremitci A, Cakir FY, Gorucu J, Alpaslan T, Yazici E, et al. Shear bond strength of composite bonded to Er, Cr:YSGG laser-prepared dentin. Photomed Laser Surg 2008; 26(5):495–500.

Ramos AC, Esteves-Oliveira M, Arana-Chavez VE, de Paula Eduardo C. Adhesives bonded to erbium:yttrium–aluminum–garnet laser-irradiated dentin: Transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and tensile bond strength analyses. Lasers Med Sci 2010; 25(2):181–9.

Bahrami B, Askari N, Tielemans M, Heysselaer D, Lamard L, Peremans A, et al. Effect of low fluency dentin conditioning on tensile bond strength of composite bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin: A preliminary study. Lasers Med Sci 2011; 26(2):187–91.

Dunn WJ, Davis JT, Bush AC. Shear bond strength and SEM evaluation of composite bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin and enamel. Dent Mater 2005; 21(7):616–24.

Tarçin B, Günday M, Oveçoğlu HS, Türkmen C, Oveçoğlu ML, Oksüz M, et al. Tensile bond strength of dentin adhesives on acid- and laser-etched dentin surfaces. Quintessence Int 2009; 40 (10):865–74.

Marotti J, Geraldo-Martins VR, Bello-Silva MS, de Paula Eduardo C, Apel C, Gutknecht N. Influence of etching with erbium, chromium:yttrium scandium–gallium–garnet laser on microleakage of class V restoration. Lasers Med Sci 2010;25(3):325–9.

De Souza-Gabriel AE, Chinelatti MA, Borsatto MC, Pecora JD, Palma-Dibb RG, Corona SA. Effect of Er ;YAG laser irridiation distance on superficial dentin morphology . Am J Dent 2006;19(4) : 217-21.

Gabriel S, Amaral FLB, Pecora JD, Palma Dibb RG, Corona Sam. Shear bond strength of resin modified glass ionomer cements t Er;YAG laser treated tooth structure . Oper Dent 2006;31(2):212-8.

Keller U, Hibst R. Effects of Er;YAG laser on enamel bonding of composite materials . Laser In Orthopedic . Dental and Veterinary Medicine II 1993;spie:1880 163-8.

Christensen GJ. Cavity preparation: cutting or air abrasion? J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:1651-4.

Lessa FC, Mantovani CP, Barroso JM, Chinelatti MA, Palma-Dibb RG, Pécora JD ,et al. Shear bond strength to primary enamel: influence of Er:YAG laser irradiation distance . J Dent Child (Chic) 2007; 74(1):26-9.

Başaran G, Hamamcı N, Akkurt A . Shear bond strength of bonding to enamel with different laser irradiation distances. Lasers Med Sci 2011; 26(2):149-56.

Shahabi, Chiniforush N, Bahramian H, Monzavi A, Baghalian A, Kharazifard MJ. The effect of erbium family laser on tensile bond Strengrth of composite to dentin in comparison with conventional method. Lasers Med Sci 2013; 28(1):139-42.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22037/jlms.v5i3.4845