• Logo
  • SBMUJournals

Assessment of Microleakage of Class V Composite Resin Restoration Following Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Er:YAG) Laser Conditioning and Acid Etching with Two Different Bonding Systems

Farahnaz Arbabzadeh Zavareh, Pouran Samimi, Reza Birang, Massoumeh Eskini, Stephane Ayoub Bouraima




INTRODUCTION: The use of laser for cavity preparation or conditioning of dentin and enamel surfaces as an alternative for dental tissue acid-etch have increased in recent years. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare microleakage at enamel-composite and dentincomposite interfaces following Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet(Er:YAG) laser conditioning or acid-etching of enamel and dentin, hybridized with different bonding systems.

METHODS: Class V cavities were prepared on the lingual and buccal surfaces of 50 recently extracted intact human posterior teeth with occlusal margin in the enamel and gingival margin in the dentin. The cavities were randomly assigned to five groups: group1:conditioned with laser (Energy=120mJ, Frequency=10Hz, Pulse duration=100μs for Enamel and Energy=80mJ, Frequency=10Hz, Pulse duration=100μs for Dentin) + Optibond FL, group2:conditioned with laser + etching with 35% phosphoric acid + Optibond FL, group3:conditioned with laser + Clearfil SE Bond, group 4 (control):acid etched with 35% phosphoric acid + Optibond FL, group 5 (control): Clearfil SE Bond. All cavities were restored using Point 4 composite resin. All samples were stored in distilled water at 37°c for 24 h, then were thermocycled for 500 cycles and immersed in 50% silver nitrate solution for 24 h. The teeth were sectioned bucco-lingually to evaluate the dye penetration. Kruskal-Wallis & Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS: In occlusal margins, the least microleakage showed in groups 2, 4 and 5. The maximum microleakage was observed in group 3 (P=0.009). In gingival margins, the least microleakage was recorded in group2, while the most microleakage was found in group 5 (P=0.001). Differences between 5 study groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). The microleakage scores were higher at the gingival margins.

CONCLUSION: The use of the Er:YAG laser for conditioning with different dentin adhesive systems influenced the marginal sealing of composite resin restorations.


Er-YAG Laser; conditioning; resin composite; bonding agent


Carvalho RM, Yoshiyama M, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. In vitro study on the dimensional changes of human dentine after demineralization. Arch Oral Biol 1996; 41(4): 369-77.

Buonocuore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34(6): 849-53.

Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S. Adhesive and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper Dent 2001; 26(suppl.6):119-44.

Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982; 16(3): 265-73.

Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1992; 71(8): 1530-40.

Gutknecht N, Apel C, Schafer C, Lampert F. Microleakage of composite fillings in Er,Cr:YSGG laser-prepared class II cavities. Lasers Surg Med 2001; 28(4): 371-4.

Apel C, Gutknecht N. Bond strength of composites on Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiated enamel. In: SPIE proceedings Vol. 3564 , Medical Application of laser in Dermatology, Cardiology, Ophthalmology and Dentistry II 1999; 197-200.

Hibst R, Keller U. Experimental studies of the application of the Er:YAG laser on dental hard substances: I. Measurement of the ablation rate. Lasers Surg Med 1989; 9(4): 338-44.

Keller U, Hibst R. Experimental studies of the application of the Er:YAG laser on dental hard substances: II. Light microscopic and SEM investigations. Lasers Surg Med 1989; 9(4): 345-51.

Hibst R, Keller U. The mechanism of Er:YAG laser induced ablation on dental hard substances. Proc SPIE 1993; 1880: 156-62.

Burkes EJ, Hoke J, Gomes E, Wolbarsht M. Wet versus dry enamel ablation by Er:YAG laser. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67(6): 847-51.

Visuri SR, Walsh JT Jr, Wigdor HA. Erbium laser ablation of dental hard tissue: effect of water cooling. Lasers Surg Med 1996; 18(3): 294-300.

Aoki A, Ishikawa I, Yamada T, Otsuki M, Watanabe H, Tagami J, et al. Comparison between Er:YAG laser and conventional technique for root caries treatment in vitro. J Dent Res 1998; 77(6): 1404-14.

Niu W, Eto JN, Kimura Y, Takeda FH, Matsumoto K. A study on microleakage after resin filling of class V cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1998; 16(4): 227-31.

Armengol V, Jean A, Rohanizadeh R, Hamel H. Scanning electron microscopic analysis of diseased and healthy dental hard tissues after Er:YAG laser irradiation: in vitro study. J Endod 1999; 25(8): 543-6.

Martinez-Insua A, Da Silva Dominguez L, Rivera FG, Santana-Penin UA. Differences in bonding to acid-etched or Er:YAG laser-treated enamel and dentin surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 2000 ; 84(3): 280-8.

Oliveira DC, Manhaes LA, Marques MM, Matos AB. Microtensile bond strength analysis of different adhesive systems and dentin prepared with high-speed and Er:YAG laser: A comperative study. Photomed Laser Surg 2005; 23(2): 219-24.

Shigetani Y, Tate Y, Okamoto A, Iwaku M, Abu-Bakr N. A study of cavity preparation by Er:YAG laser. Effects on the marginal leakage of composite resin restoration. Dent Mater J 2002; 21(3): 238-49.

Delme KIM, De Moor RJG. A scanning electron microscopic comparison of different caries removal techniques for root caries treatment. J Oral Laser Applications 2003; 4: 235-42.

Liberman R, Segal TH, Nordenberg D, Serebro LI. Adhesion of composite materials to enamel: Comparison between the use of acid and lasing as pretreatment. Lasers Surg Med 1984; 4(4): 323-7.

Cooper LF, Myers ML, Nelson DG, Mowery AS. Shear strength of composite bonded to laser-pretreated dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 60(1): 45-9.

Ceballos L, Osorio R, Toledano M, Marshall GW. Microleakage of composite restorations after acid or Er:YAG laser cavity treatments. Dent Mater 2001; 17(4):340-6.

Setien VJ, Cobb DS, Denehy GE, Vargas MA. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of class V resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent 2001;14(3): 157-62.

Wright GZ, Mc Connell RJ, Keller U. Microleakage of class V composite restorations prepared conventionally with those prepared with an Er:YAG laser: a pilot study. Pediatr Dent 1993; 15(6): 425-6.

Armengol V, Jean A, Enkel B, Assoumou M, Hamel H. Microleakage of class V composite restorations following Er:YAG and Nd:YAG laser irradiation compared to acid-etch: an in vitro study. Lasers Med Sci 2002; 17(2): 93-100.

Moritz A, Gutknecht N, Schoop U, Goharkay K, Wernish J, Sperr W. Alternatives in enamel conditioning: a comparison of conventional and innoviate methods. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1996; 14(3): 133-6.

Araujo RM, Eduardo CP, Durate SL Jr, Araujo MA, Loffredo LC. Microleakage and nanoleakage: influence of laser in cavity preparation and dentin pretreatment. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2001; 19(6): 325-32.

Corona SAM, Borsatto MC, Palma Dibb RG, Ramos RP, Brugnera A, Pecora JD. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after bur, air-abrasion or Er:YAG laser preparation. Oper Dent 2001; 26(5): 491-7.

Keller U, Hibst R. Ultrastructural changes of enamel and dentin following Er:YAG laser irradiation on teeth. Proc SPIE 1990; 1200: 408-15.

Navarro RS, Gouw-Soares S, Cassoni A, Haypeek P, Zezell DM, de Paula Eduardo C. The influence of Er:YAG laser ablation with variable pulse width on morphology and microleakage of composite restorations. Lasers Med Sci 2010; 25(6): 881-9.

Atash R, Vanden Abbeele A. Sealing ability of newgeneration adhesive systems in primary teeth: an in vitro study. Pediatr Dent 2004; 26(4): 322-8.

Krmek SJ, Bogdan I, Simeon P, Katanec D, Mehicic GP, Anic I. A three-dimensional evaluation of microleakage of class V cavities prepared by the very short pulse mode of the Er:YAG laser. Lasers Med Sci 2010; 25(6): 823-8.

Freitas PM, Navarro RS, Barros JA, Eduardo CDP. The use of Er:YAG laser for cavity preparation: an SEM evaluation. Microsc Res Tech 2007; 70(9): 803-8.

Eguro T, Maeda T, Otsuki M, Nishimura Y, Katsuumi I, Tanaka H. Adhesion of Er:YAG laser-irradiated dentin and composite resins: application of various treatments on irradiated surface. Lasers Surg Med 2002; 30(4): 267-72.

Colucci V, Lucisano MP, do Amaral FL, Pecora JD, Palma-Dibb RG, Corona SA. Influence of water flow rate on shear bond strength of resin composite to Er:YAG cavity preparation. Am J Dent 2008; 21(2): 124-8.

Yazici AR, Frentzan M, Dayangac B. In vitro analysis of the effects of acid or laser etching on microleakage around composite resin restorations. J Dent 2001; 29(5): 355-61.

Borsatto MC, Corona SA, Dibb RG, Ramos RP, Pécora JD. Microleakage of a resin sealant after acid-etching, Er:YAG laser irradiation and air-abrasion of pits and fissures. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2001; 19(2): 83-7.

Attar N, Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Bicer CO, Firatli E. Microleakage of Class V cavities with different adhesive systems prepared by a diamond instrument and different parameters of Er:YAG laser irradiation. Photomed and Laser Surg 2008; 26(6): 585-91.

Delme KI, Deman PJ, De Moor RJ. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after conventional and Er:YAG laser preparation. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32(9): 676-85.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/2010.v4i1.3875