• Logo
  • SBMUPublishing

Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of 5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish and Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet (Nd:YAG) laser and their Combined Application on Dentin Hypersensitivity Treatment

Ahmad Mogharehabed, Heidar Khademi, Zeinab Abdi Zamharir, Stephane Ayoub Bouraima, Jaber Yaghini, Banafsheh Poormoradi




INTRODUCTION: Dentin hypersensitivity is one of the most common complications that patients suffer from after periodontal therapies. So far many investigators have used different types of fluoride and laser for treatment of this complication. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of 5% sodium fluoride varnish and (Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet) Nd:YAG laser and their combined application on dentin hypersensitivity treatment.

METHODS: The study is a prospective interventional clinical trial. We selected a group of 9 patients with a total of 60 hypersensitive teeth. Each patient had at least 4 hypersensitive teeth. These 4 teeth were randomly placed in 4 different groups. Group1 didn’t receive any treatment. Group2 was treated with 5% sodium fluoride varnish (A Durashield Company product). Group3 was irradiated with Nd: YAG laser (1w, 20Hz, 120s). Group4 was treated by 5% sodium fluoride varnish and Nd: YAG laser combined (same parameters as group3). The assessment of the patients’ pain was done with cold air blast test (CAB) and visual analyzing scale (VAS) after stimulation using a probe and cold air. Patients’ pain was assessed before and just after treatment, and also 2 hours, 1 week and 2 weeks after treatment. For the assessment of pulp vitality we used the electric pulp test (EPT) at each session. SPSS 11.5 was used to process the results obtained. For the CAB and VAS changes in different groups, two-way repeated-measures ANOVA as well as Post-Hoc-Tukey tests were used. For the comparison of the different treatment groups at each session, one-way ANOVA, Post-Hoc-Tukey and or Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used.

RESULTS: VAS and CAB scores didn’t show any significant difference between different groups before treatment. Analysis of results obtained with two-way ANOVA test for repeated measures showed significant statistical differences for CAB and VAS scores in all groups between before and after treatment except for CAB score in control group. In the comparison of the fluoride varnish group and laser group alone with fluoride varnish-laser combined group using VAS and CAB scores, we found a significant difference. But we didn’t find any significant difference for the comparison between the varnish fluoride group and the laser group using the same score.

CONCLUSION: The use of 5% sodium fluoride varnish and laser for treatment of dentin hypersensitivity is accompanied by a placebo effect. Although it appears that, if we omit the placebo effect, we had an improvement in all 3 treatment groups. But this improvement was more obvious for the treatment group4 (fluoride –laser) compared to other groups.


: dentine hypersensitivity; Nd: YAG laser; sodium fluorides


Kimura Y, Wilder –Smith P, Yonaga K, Matsumoto K. Treatment of dentine hypersensitivity by lasers: a review. J Clin Periodontol 2007; 27(10):715-21.

Renton-Harper P, Midda M. Nd:YAG laser treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. Br Dent J 1992; 172(1):13-6.

Kumar NG, Mehta DS. Short-term assessment of the Nd:YAG laser with & without sodium fluoride varnish in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity-a clinical & scanning electron microscopy study. J Periodontol 2005; 76(7):1140-7.

Dowell P, Addy M. Dentin hypersensitivity- a review. Aetiology, symptoms and theories of pain production. J Clin Periodontol 1983; 10(4):341-50.

Perry R, Carranza FA, General principles of periodontal surgey. In: Newman M, Takei H, Carranza FA. Editors. Caranza’s clinical periodontology. 9th ed Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2002; 55: 734-5.

Gaffar A. Treating hypersensitivity with fluoride varnishes. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998; 19(11): 1088-90, 1092, 1094 passim.

Ritter AV, de L Dias W, Miguez P, Caplan DJ, Swift EJ. Treating cervical dentin hypersensitivity with fluoride varnish: a randomized clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137(7): 1013-20.

Merika K, Hefti Arthur F, Preshaw PM. Comparison of two topical treatments for dentine sensitivity. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2006; 14(1) 38-41.

Poor Samimi J. [Comparative evaluation of the effects of Nd: YAG laser and Er:YAG in the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity]. Dentistry Doctorate Thesis- Dentistry School- Esfahan University of Medical Sciences, Academic Year 2004-2005. (Persian).

Hsu PJ, Chen JH, Chuang FH, Roan RT. The combined occluding effects of fluoride – containing dentin desensitizer and Nd: YAG laser irradiation on human dentinal tubules: an in vitro study. kaohsiung J Med Sci 2006; 22(1): 24-9.

Lan WH, Lee BS, Liu HC, Lin CP. Morphologic study of Nd: YAG laser usage in treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. J Endod 2004; 30(3): 131-4.

White JM, Goodis HE, Setcos JC, Eakle S, Hulscher BE, Rose CL. Effects of pulsed Nd: YAG laser energy on human teeth. A three-year follow up study. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 124(7): 45-51.

Yaghini J. [Comparative evaluation of a set of changes in dentinal structure by the SEM method after irradiation of two types of lasers Nd: YAG and Er:YAG with dose to resolve Hypersensitivity]. Dentistry Doctorate Thesis- Dentistry School- Esfahan University of Medical Sciences, Academic Year 2005-2006. (Persian).

Dilsiz A, Canakci V, Ozdemir A, Kaya Y. Clinical evaluation of Nd:YAG and 685-nm diode laser therapy for desensitization of teeth with gingival recession. Photomed Laser Surg 2009; 27(6):843-8.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/2010.v3i3.3446