• Logo
  • SBMUJournals

Aspects of Diode Laser (805 nm) Hair Removal Safety in a Mixed-Race Group of Patients

Izabela Załęska, Magdalena Atta-Motte





 Introduction: Laser hair removal (LHR) has become one of the most popular treatments in aesthetics. Side effects are an inevitable part of laser therapy, therefore managing them is crucial for every laser practitioner to ensure patients’ safety along with achieving the best results. The available references describe the effectiveness of the diode LHR for all skin types according to the Fitzpatrick scale, but the question of patient safety and minimization of side effects and postoperative complications in mixed-race patients remains unanswered. This study aims to illustrate aspects of specific side effects in patients of mixed ethnicity and the impact of those effects on the results of the treatment.

Methods: The study was conducted in Poland and the United Kingdom on 216 patients of various ethnic backgrounds. This study analyses the frequency of side effects in a mixed-race group of 32 participants, taking into account their skin type according to the Fitzpatrick scale. The patients received a course of 6 treatments using diode laser 805 nm. An objective and a subjective method were used to analyse treatment results and side effects, with adverse effects documented, if observed. Treatment settings were adjusted to skin reaction during the patch test.

Results: Objective analysis was different from the subjective analysis of the treatment’s effectiveness. No adverse effects were observed. Side effects such as hyperpigmentation, skin irritation, skin burns, and skin hypersensitivity were found.

Conclusion: 805 nm diode laser is effective and efficient at hair removal in mixed-race patients. It is a safe treatment in terms of skin reaction as only short-term side effects were observed in the treated area and no adverse effects were noted. To achieve the best results and to avoid adverse effects it is necessary to adjust treatment settings according to the individual patient’s skin reaction.


Side effects; Epilation; Diode laser; Ethnicity; Hair removal.


Cameron H, Ibbotson SH, Dawe RS, Ferguson J, Moseley H. Within-patient right-left blinded comparison of diode (810 nm) laser therapy and intense pulsed light therapy for hair removal. Lasers Med Sci. 2008;23(4):393-397. doi:10.1007/s10103-007-0510-6

Fayne RA, Perper M, Eber AE, Aldahan AS, Nouri K. Laser and Light Treatments for Hair Reduction in Fitzpatrick Skin Types IV-VI: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018;19(2):237-252. doi:10.1007/ s40257-017-0316-7

Royo J, Urdiales F, Moreno J, Al-Zarouni M, Cornejo P, Trelles MA. Six-month follow-up multicenter prospective study of 368 patients, phototypes III to V, on epilation efficacy using an 810-nm diode laser at low fluence. Lasers Med Sci. 2011;26(2):247-255. doi:10.1007/s10103-010- 0846-1

Agarwal M, Velaskar S, Gold MH. Efficacy of a Low Fluence, High Repetition Rate 810nm Diode Laser for Permanent Hair Reduction in Indian Patients with Skin Types IV-VI. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2016;9(11):29-33.

Wanner M. Laser hair removal. Dermatol Ther. 2005;18(3):209-216. doi:10.1111/j.1529-8019.2005.05020.x

Gan SD, Graber EM. Laser hair removal: a review. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39(6):823-838. doi:10.1111/dsu.12116

Nanni CA, Alster TS. Laser-assisted hair removal: side effects of Q-switched Nd:YAG, long-pulsed ruby, and alexandrite lasers. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;41(2 Pt 1):165-171.

Lanigan SW. Incidence of side effects after laser hair removal. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49(5):882-886. doi:10.1067/s0190

Ibrahimi OA, Avram MM, Hanke CW, Kilmer SL, Anderson RR. Laser hair removal. Dermatol Ther. 2011;24(1):94-107. doi:10.1111/j.1529-8019.2010.01382.x

Sadighha A, Mohaghegh Zahed G. Meta-analysis of hair removal laser trials. Lasers Med Sci. 2009;24(1):21-25. doi:10.1007/s10103-007-0515-1

Pavlović MD, Adamič M, Nenadić D. Fixed, low radiant exposure vs. incremental radiant exposure approach for diode laser hair reduction: a randomized, split axilla, comparative single-blinded trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(12):2377-2381. doi:10.1111/jdv.13239

Tremaine AM, Avram MM. FDA MAUDE data on complications with lasers, light sources, and energy-based devices. Lasers Surg Med. 2015;47(2):133-140. doi:10.1002/ lsm.22328

Ormiga P, Ishida CE, Boechat A, Ramos ESM. Comparison of the effect of diode laser versus intense pulsed light in axillary hair removal. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40(10):1061- 1069. doi:10.1097/dss.0000000000000138

Koo B, Ball K, Tremaine AM, Zachary CB. A comparison of two 810 diode lasers for hair removal: low fluence, multiple pass versus a high fluence, single pass technique. Lasers Surg Med. 2014;46(4):270-274. doi:10.1002/lsm.22226

Al-Hamamy HR, Saleh AZ, Rashed ZA. Evaluation of Effectiveness of Diode Laser System (808 nm) versus Intense Pulse Light (IPL) in the Management of Unwanted Hair: A Split Face Comparative Study. Int J Med Phys Clin Eng Radiat Oncol. 2015;4(1):41-48. doi:10.4236/ ijmpcero.2015.41006

Krauss MC. Removal of bikini hair using a rapid 810-nm diode laser. Cosmet Dermatol. 2008;21(7):392-396.

Jo SJ, Kim JY, Ban J, Lee Y, Kwon O, Koh W. Efficacy and Safety of Hair Removal with a Long-Pulsed Diode Laser Depending on the Spot Size: A Randomized, Evaluators- Blinded, Left-Right Study. Ann Dermatol. 2015;27(5):517- 522. doi:10.5021/ad.2015.27.5.517

Alajlan A, Shapiro J, Rivers JK, MacDonald N, Wiggin J, Lui H. Paradoxical hypertrichosis after laser epilation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53(1):85-88. doi:10.1016/j. jaad.2004.06.054

Rasheed AI. Uncommonly reported side effects of hair removal by long pulsed-alexandrite laser. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2009;8(4):267-274. doi:10.1111/j.1473- 2165.2009.00465.x

Honeybrook A, Crossing T, Bernstein E, Bloom J, Woodward J. Long-term outcome of a patient with paradoxical hypertrichosis after laser epilation. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2018;20(3):179-183. doi:10.1080/14764172.20 17.1383614

Al-Hargan A, Ghobara YA, Al-Issa A. Purpura induced by laser hair removal: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2018;12(1):60. doi:10.1186/s13256-018-1604-4

Nistico SP, Del Duca E, Farnetani F, et al. Removal of unwanted hair: efficacy, tolerability, and safety of long-pulsed 755-nm alexandrite laser equipped with a sapphire handpiece. Lasers Med Sci. 2018;33(7):1479-1483. doi:10.1007/s10103-018-2503-z

Battle EF Jr, Hobbs LM. Laser-assisted hair removal for darker skin types. Dermatol Ther. 2004;17(2):177-183. doi:10.1111/j.1396-0296.2004.04018.x

Galadari I. Comparative evaluation of different hair removal lasers in skin types IV, V, and VI. Int J Dermatol. 2003;42(1):68-70.

Haedersdal M, Wulf HC. Evidence-based review of hair removal using lasers and light sources. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20(1):9-20. doi:10.1111/j.1468- 3083.2005.01327.x

Amin SP, Goldberg DJ. Clinical comparison of four hair removal lasers and light sources. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2006;8(2):65-68. doi:10.1080/14764170600717902

Lancer HA. Lancer Ethnicity Scale (LES). Lasers Surg Med. 1998;22(1):9. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096- 9101(1998)22:1<9::AID-LSM4>3.0.CO;2-T

Rao J, Goldman MP. Prospective, comparative evaluation of three laser systems used individually and in combination for axillary hair removal. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(12):1671- 1676.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22037/jlms.v10i2.22465