• Logo
  • SBMUJournals

Efficacy of High-Power Laser in Alleviating Pain and Improving Function of Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Farshad Nouri, Seyed Ahmad Raeissadat, Dariush Eliaspour, Seyed Mansoor Rayegani, Maryam Sadat Rahimi, Behnaz Movahedi




Introduction: In this study, a single-blind and randomized controlled trial (RCT) for assessing the effectiveness of high-power (up to 12 W) laser therapy (HPLT) on patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) was carried out.
Methods: Forty-four patients were randomly assigned to two treatment groups by generating random numbers with MATLAB 2014b software, where odd and even numbers were attributed to sham laser group (group A) and actual laser group (group B), respectively. Group B patients underwent HPLT with total dose of 300 J/session for 5 consecutive sessions separated by a 2-day interval. On the other hand, sham laser was applied to group A patients. Both groups had the same exercise therapy programs during the study period (3 months). The exercise therapy program included isometric knee exercise for 3 sets per day and 10 times in each set, with duration of 10 seconds per time and straight leg raise for 15 seconds 10 times a day. The group codes of patients were not revealed to subjects and data analyzer until completion of the study. Kujala, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaires were chosen as outcome measures. These questionnaires were completed at three points during the study; at the beginning of the study to obtain the pre-therapy conditions and one month and three months after the start of the study to evaluate post-therapy conditions.
Results: Two main analyses were conducted: within-group and between-group analyses. Within-group analyses indicated significant improvements in respect to all measurements where pre-therapy and post-therapy comparisons were conducted in both groups (P < 0.05). On the other hand, between-group comparisons did not reveal any statistically significant functional difference between group A and group B regarding the evaluative criteria (P > 0.05) except for pain VAS (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: This study indicated that short-term HPLT accompanied by appropriate exercise regimen significantly decreased pain in patients with PFPS. But it was not recommended as an efficient modality in functional improvement. Also, it was observed that, in the short-term period of study, HPLT was a safe modality.


High-power laser, Patellar chondromalacia, Patellofemoral pain syndrome, Exercise


Jensen R, Kvale A, Baerheim A. Is pain in patellofemoral pain syndrome neuropathic? Clin J Pain. 2008;24(5):384- 394. doi:10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181658170

Evans RC. Illustrated Orthopedic Physical Assessment-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 200m.

Nejati P, Forogh B, Moeineddin R, Baradaran HR, Nejati M. Patellofemoral pain syndrome in Iranian female athletes. Acta Med Iran. 2011;49(3):169-172.

Piazza L, Lisboa ACA, da Costa V, et al. Symptoms and functional limitations of patellofemoral pain syndrome patients. Rev Dor. 2012;13(1):50-54. doi:10.1590/S1806- 00132012000100009

Glaviano NR, Kew M, Hart JM, Saliba S. Demographic and epidemiological trends in patellofemoral pain. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10(3):281-290.

McConnell J. The management of chondromalacia patellae: a long term solution. Aust J Physiother. 1986;32(4):215-223. doi:10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60654-1

Bentley G, Dowd G. Current concepts of etiology and treatment of chondromalacia patellae. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984(189):209-228.

Crossley K, Bennell K, Green S, McConnell J. A systematic review of physical interventions for patellofemoral pain syndrome. Clin J Sport Med. 2001;11(2):103-110.

Eng JJ, Pierrynowski MR. Evaluation of soft foot orthotics in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Phys Ther. 1993;73(2):62-68; discussion 68-70.

Eburne J, Bannister G. The McConnell regimen versus isometric quadriceps exercises in the management of anterior knee pain. A randomised prospective controlled trial. Knee. 1996;3(3):151-153. doi:10.1016/0968- 0160(96)00214-1

Raeissadat A, Reza Soltani Z. Study of Long Term Effects of Laser Therapy Versus Local Corticosteroid Injection in Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. J Lasers Med Sci. 201O;1(1):24-30. doi:10.22037/2010.v1i1.2134

Rayegani SM, Bahrami MH, Eliaspour D, et al. The effects of low intensity laser on clinical and electrophysiological parameters of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Lasers Med Sci. 2013;4(4):182-189.

Rayegani SM, Raeissadat SA, Heidari S, Moradi-Joo M. Safety and Effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Lasers Med Sci. 2017;8(Suppl 1):S12-s19. doi:10.15171/jlms.2017.s3

Alayat MS, Atya AM, Ali MM, Shosha TM. Long-term effect of high-intensity laser therapy in the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized blinded placebo-controlled trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2014;29(3):1065- 1073. doi:10.1007/s10103-013-1472-5

Stiglic-Rogoznica N, Stamenkovic D, Frlan-Vrgoc L, Avancini-Dobrovic V, Vrbanic TS. Analgesic effect of high intensity laser therapy in knee osteoarthritis. Coll Antropol. 2011;35 Suppl 2:183-185.

Kheshie AR, Alayat MS, Ali MM. High-intensity versus low-level laser therapy in the treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2014;29(4):1371-1376. doi:10.1007/s10103-014- 1529-0

Dundar U, Turkmen U, Toktas H, Ulasli AM, Solak O. Effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy and splinting in lateral epicondylitis; a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30(3):1097-1107. doi:10.1007/ s10103-015-1716-7

Santamato A, Solfrizzi V, Panza F, et al. Short-term effects of high-intensity laser therapy versus ultrasound therapy in the treatment of people with subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2009;89(7):643-652. doi:10.2522/ptj.20080139

Bjordal JM, Couppe C, Chow RT, Tuner J, Ljunggren EA. A systematic review of low level laser therapy with location-specific doses for pain from chronic joint disorders. Aust J Physiother. 2003;49(2):107-116.

Enwemeka CS, Parker JC, Dowdy DS, Harkness EE, Sanford LE, Woodruff LD. The efficacy of low-power lasers in tissue repair and pain control: a meta-analysis study. Photomed Laser Surg. 2004;22(4):323-329. doi:10.1089/ pho.2004.22.323

Nijs J, Van Geel C, Van der auwera C, Van de Velde B. Diagnostic value of five clinical tests in patellofemoral pain syndrome. Man Ther. 2006;11(1):69-77. doi:10.1016/j. math.2005.04.002

Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health. 1990;13(4):227-236.

Negahban H, Pouretezad M, Yazdi MJ, et al. Persian translation and validation of the Kujala Patellofemoral Scale in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(26):2259-2263. doi:10.3109/0963 8288.2012.683480

Ebrahimzadeh MH, Makhmalbaf H, Birjandinejad A, Keshtan FG, Hoseini HA, Mazloumi SM. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in Persian Speaking Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2014;2(1):57-62.

van Linschoten R, van Middelkoop M, Berger MY, et al. Supervised exercise therapy versus usual care for patellofemoral pain syndrome: an open label randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2009;339:b4074. doi:10.1136/bmj. b4074

Kujala UM, Jaakkola LH, Koskinen SK, Taimela S, Hurme M, Nelimarkka O. Scoring of patellofemoral disorders. Arthroscopy. 1993;9(2):159-163.

McConnell S, Kolopack P, Davis AM. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): a review of its utility and measurement properties. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;45(5):453-461.

Mantha S, Thisted R, Foss J, Ellis JE, Roizen MF. A proposal to use confidence intervals for visual analog scale data for pain measurement to determine clinical significance. Anesth Analg. 1993;77(5):1041-1047.

Dexter F, Chestnut DH. Analysis of statistical tests to compare visual analog scale measurements among groups. Anesthesiology. 1995;82(4):896-902.

Scott J, Huskisson EC. Graphic representation of pain. Pain. 1976;2(2):175-184.

Philip BK. Parametric statistics for evaluation of the visual analog scale. Anesth Analg. 1990;71(6):710.

Frost J. Best Way to Analyze Likert Item Data: Two Sample T-Test versus Mann-Whitney. Minitab Blog; 2016. http:// blog.minitab.com/blog/adventures-in-statistics-2/best-way-to-analyze-likert-item-data:-two-sample-t-test-versus-mann-whitney. Accessed November 20, 2017.

Rogvi-Hansen B, Ellitsgaard N, Funch M, Dall-Jensen M, Prieske J. Low level laser treatment of chondromalacia patellae. Int Orthop. 1991;15(4):359-361.

Halabchi F, Mazaheri R, Seif-Barghi T. Patellofemoral pain syndrome and modifiable intrinsic risk factors; how to assess and address? Asian J Sports Med. 2013;4(2):85-100.

Wise HH, Fiebert I, Kates JL. EMG Biofeedback as Treatment for Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1984;6(2):95-103.

Boucher JP, King MA, Lefebvre R, Pepin A. Quadriceps femoris muscle activity in patellofemoral pain syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20(5):527-532. doi:10.1177/036354659202000507

Steinkamp LA, Dillingham MF, Markel MD, Hill JA, Kaufman KR. Biomechanical considerations in patellofemoral joint rehabilitation. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21(3):438-444. doi:10.1177/036354659302100319

Rice MA, Bennett JG, Ruhling RO. Comparison of two exercises on VMO and VL EMG activity and force production. Isokinet Exerc Sci. 1995;5(2):61-67 doi:10.3233/ IES-1995-5201

Cerny K. Vastus medialis oblique/vastus lateralis muscle activity ratios for selected exercises in persons with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome. Phys Ther. 1995;75(8):672-683.

Powers CM. Patellar kinematics, part I: the influence of vastus muscle activity in subjects with and without patellofemoral pain. Phys Ther. 2000;80(10):956-964.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22037/jlms.v10i1.21873