Comparison of two method of hydrocele repair in children

Omid Amanollahi, Zahra Ghasem nejad, Ardalan Samadzadegan

Abstract


10

Introduction: Hydroceles is accumulation of fluid in the processus vaginalis

(PV) resulting in swelling of the inguinal region or scrotum. Its treatment depends on age, symptoms and conection with abdomen. Preferred method of treatment is subject of debate. In this study we assessed two different method of hydrocele repair in children's hydrocelotomy and hydrocelectomy and compared their complications and recurrences rate.

Materials and Methods: 70 children with noncomunicating hydrocele included in study, allocating every other subject to each treatment group (alternating allocation) for the hydrocelotomy group(incision and evacuation of hydrocele sac)and hydrocelectomygroup(excision and removing of heydrocele sac. The complications and recurrence rate were recorded in both groups and compared together.

Results: From 70 children 25 patient had right side hydrocele(%35/7) and in 45 children hydrocele found in left side.(%64/3). No statistical difference was found for complications like bleeding, wound infection, spermatic cord damage, and recurrent hydrocele between two groups in post operation Period.

Conclusion: although there not found very different result in rate of complications and recurrency between two groups but it seems that hydrocelotomy is enough treatment with less probability of spermatic cord damage and other complication.

 


Keywords


hydrocelotomy, hydrocelectomy, recurrence

Full Text:

PDF

13

References


Ortenberg J, Cendron M: Pediatric Hydrocele and Hernia Surgery. emedicine.medscape.com/ article/1015147-overview Updated: Aug 02, 2016 Miller Keane, Hydrocelectomy-procedure, recovery, blood, tube, pain.

Rathaus V, Konen O, Shapiro M, et al: Ultrasound features of spermatic cord hydrocele in children. The British journal of Radiology 2001;74(885):818-20.

Esposito C, Valla JS, Najmaldin A, et al: Incidence and management of hydrocele following varicocele surgery in children. The Journal of urology 2004;171(3):1271-3

Skinner MA, Grosfeld JL: Inguinal and umbilical hernia repair in infants and children. The Surgical clinics of North America 1993;73(3):439-49.

Wilson JM, Aaronson DS, Schrader R, et al: Hydrocele in the pediatric patient: inguinal or scrotal approach?. The Journal of urology 2008;180(4S):1724-8.

Fearne C, Abela M, Aquilina D: Scrotal approach for inguinal hernia and hydrocele repair in boys. European journal of pediatric surgery 2002;12(02):116-7.

Hall NJ, Ron O, Eaton S, et al: Surgery for hydrocele in children—an avoidable excess?. Journal of pediatric surgery 2011;46(12):2401-5.

Lym L, Ross Jh, Alexander F, et al: Risk of contralateral hydrocele or hernia after unilateral hydrocele repair in children. The Journal of urology 1999;162(3):1169-70.

Osifo OD, Osaigbovo EO: Congenital hydrocele: prevalence and outcome among male children who underwent neonatal circumcision in Benin City, Nigeria. Journal of pediatric urology 2008;4(3):178-82.

Amanollahi O, Diaz DN, Moetamedi V: New technique for herniotomy in children: a clinical trial. Annals of Pediatric Surgery 2015;11(3):197-9.

Blanco AE, Olmo IC, Merchán JG: Surgical treatment of hydrocele with local anesthesia: 10- year experience. Archivos espanoles de urologia 2001;54(10):1075-8.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22037/irjps.v5i1.24177

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


pISSN: 2423-5067

eISSN: 2423-7612

Creative Commons License
This journal and its contents are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.