Comparing Short Clinical Evaluation Exercise and Direct Observation of Procedural Skills With the Traditional Evaluation Approach on the Clinical Skills of Forensic Medicine Residents
International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Forensic Medicine,
Vol. 10 No. 1 (2020),
19 February 2020
Background: The development of clinical teaching necessitates the use of novel and appropriate clinical evaluation methods. In the meantime, the use of new evaluation approaches that enhance learning at the same time has been recommended. This study aimed to compare the effect of the two new evaluation methods of direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) and short clinical evaluation exercise (Mini-CEX) with the conventional evaluation method on clinical skills of forensic medicine residents.
Methods: This is a randomized trial performed among forensic medicine residents. Using Cochran's formula, the minimum sample size was calculated to be 25 individuals per group. All the residents were randomly divided into either the experimental or the control groups. After training and evaluation, the experimental group was tested using the DOPS and Mini-CEX methods three times during the course, and the control group was evaluated using the conventional method. The basis for the evaluation of the procedures (physical examination and autopsy) in both groups was the valid and reliable checklists prepared by the researchers. The results were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics (e.g., the Chi-square and independent t-test).
Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of demographic variables such as age, sex, and grade point average (GPA) (P>0.06). The means of total scores were significantly higher in the experimental group (using the Mini-CEX and DOPS methods) than the control group (conventional method) (P<0.0002).
Conclusion: The use of new evaluation methods of DOPS and Mini-CEX improved the clinical skills of forensic medicine residents. Therefore, it is recommended that resident training centers use these two methods of assessment, together with other methods, to evaluate clinical procedures and boost forensic residents' learning.
- Clinical evaluation
- Short clinical evaluation exercise (Mini-CEX)
- Direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS)
- Forensic medicine
How to Cite
Moiz B, Ali SK, Rashid A, Shariq M, Karim F. Development and pilot testing of a novel tool for evaluating practical skills in hematopathology residents in Pakistan. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 2019; 11(4 Suppl):177-80. [DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-18-00361].
Lörwaldz AC, Lahner FM, Mooser B, Perrig M, Widmer MK, Greif R, et al. Influences on the implementation of Mini-CEX and DOPS for postgraduate medical trainees’ learning: A grounded theory study. Medical Teacher. 2019; 41(4):448-56. [DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2018.1497784] [PMID]
Kipen E, Flynn E, Woodward-Kron R. Self-regulated learning lens on trainee perceptions of the Mini-CEX: A qualitative study. British Medical Journal (BMJ Open). 2019; 9(5):e026796. [DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026796] [PMID] [PMCID]
Wei CJ, Lu TH, Chien SC, Huang WT, Liu YP, Chan CY, et al. The development and use of a pharmacist-specific Mini-CEX for postgraduate year trainees in Taiwan. BMC Medical Education. 2019; 22;19(1):165. [DOI:10.1186/s12909-019-1602-2] [PMID] [PMCID]
Mortaz Hejri S, Jalili M, Masoomi R, Shirazi M, Nedjat S, Norcini J. The utility of mini-clinical evaluation exercise in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: A BEME review: BEME Guide No. 59. Medical Teacher. 2020; 42(2):125-42. [DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2019.1652732] [PMID]
Bansal M. Introduction of directly observed procedural skills (DOPS) as a part of competency-based medical education in otorhinolaryngologyIndian. Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. 2019 ;71(2):161-6. [DOI:10.1007/s12070-019-01624-y] [PMID]
Rafii F, Ghezeljeh TN, Nasrollah S. Design and implementation of clinical competency evaluation system for nursing students in medical-surgical wards. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2019 ;8(4):1408-13. [DOI:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_47_19] [PMID] [PMCID]
Ali L, Ali S, Orakzai N, Ali N. Effectiveness of direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) in postgraduate training in urology at institute of kidney diseases, Peshawar. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons. 2019; 29(6):516-19. [DOI:10.29271/jcpsp.2019.06.516] [PMID]
Siau K, Crossley J, Dunckley P, Johnson G, Feeney M, Hawkes ND, et al. Direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) assessment in diagnostic gastroscopy: Nationwide evidence of validity and competency development during training. Surgical Endoscopy. 2020; 34(1):105-14. [DOI:10.1007/s00464-019-06737-7] [PMID] [PMCID]
Soemantri D, Dodds A, Mccoll G. Examining the nature of feedback within the Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX): an analysis of 1427 Mini-CEX assessment forms. GMS Journal for Medical Education. 2018; 15;35(4):Doc47. [DOI:10.3205/zma001193eCollectio 2018. PMID:30539072].
Berendonk C, Rogausch A, Gemperli A, Himmel W. Variability and dimensionality of students and supervisors’ Mini-CEX scores in undergraduate medical clerkships - a multilevel factor analysis. BMC Medical Education. 2018 ;18(1):100. [DOI:10.1186/s12909-018-1207-1] [PMID] [PMCID]
Lörwald AC, Lahner FM, Greif R, Berendonk C, Norcini J, Huwendiek S. Factors influencing the educational impact of Mini-CEX and DOPS: A qualitative synthesis.Med Teach. 2018; 40(4):414-20. [DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2017.1408901] [PMID]
Atash Sokhan G , Bolbol Haghighi N, Bagheri H , Ebrahimi H. [Comparison of self, peer, and clinical teacher evaluation in clinical skills evaluation process of midwifery students (Persian)]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2011; 10(4):333-9.
Rahimi A, Ahmadi F. The obstacles and improving strategies of clinical education from the viewpoints of clinical instructors in Tehran’s Nursing Schools (Persian)]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2005; 5(2): 73-80.
Zareiyan Jahromi A, Ahmadi F. Learning needs assessment in bachelor of nursing: a qualitative research (Persian)]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2005; 5(2): 81-92.
Smith-Strom H, Nortvedt MW. Evaluation of evidence-based methods used to teach nursing students to critically appraise evidence. Journal of Nursing Education. 2008; 47(8):372-5. [DOI:10.3928/01484834-20080801-08] [PMID]
Shahgheibi Sh, Pooladi A, BahramRezaie M, Farhadifar F,Khatibi R. Evaluation of the effects of Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) on clinical externship students’ learning level in obstetrics ward of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Medicine Eduction. 2009; 13(1,2): 29-33.
Noohi E, Motasedi M, Haghdoost A. [Clinical teachers’ viewpoints towards objective structured clinical examination in Kerman University of Medical Science (Persian)]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2008; 8(1):113-9.
Castanelli DJ, Moonen-van Loon JMW, Jolly B, Weller JM. The reliability of a portfolio of workplace-based assessments in anesthesia training. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2019 ;66(2):193-200. [DOI:10.1007/s12630-018-1251-7] [PMID]
Wiles CM, Dawson K, Hughes TA, Llewelyn JG, Morris HR, Pickersgill TP, et al. Clinical skills evaluation of trainees in a neurology department. Clinical Medicine. 2007; 7(4):365-9. [PMID] [DOI:10.7861/clinmedicine.7-4-365] [PMID] [PMCID]
Chehrzad M , Sohail SZ, Mirzaee M, Kazem Nejad E. [Compare of Osce and traditional clinical evaluation methods on nursing students’ satisfaction (Persian)]. Journal of Medical Faculty Guilan University of Medical Sciences. 2007; 13(50):8-12.
- Abstract Viewed: 180 times
- PDF Downloaded: 47 times