• Logo
  • SBMUJournals

Pathological Results in Cadavers Suspected to Electrical Injury Referred to the Forensic Medicine Center of Tehran From 2006 to 2016

Fares Najari, Mohammad Ali Emam Hadi, Ghazaleh Sadat Araban1
96

Views

PDF

Abstract

The electrical injury is a common cause of death needing forensic assessments. In these cases, the histopathological assessment is a routine practice. The aim of this study was to determine the pathological results in cadavers suspected to electrical injury referred to the Forensic Medicine Center of Tehran, Iran. In this observational descriptive-comparative study, 745 consecutive cadavers suspected to electrical injury referred to the Forensic Medicine Center of Tehran from 2006 to 2016 were enrolled; also, the histopathological findings among them were determined and compared according to other variables. The results of this study demonstrated that 44 patients (86.3%) of those suspected to have an electrical injury and 101 patients (92.7%) of those with definite electrical injury had positive pathological results, showing a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The non-routine histopathology assessment is useful and would develop positive results in more than 80% of the cases.


Keywords

Pathology, Forensic medicine, Electrical injury

References

‎1.‎ Koumbourlis AC. Electrical injuries. Critical Care Medicine. 2002; 30(Suppl. 11):S424-30. [DOI:10.1097/00003246-200211001-‎‎00007] [PMID]‎

‎2.‎ Adukauskiene D, Vizgirdaite V, Mazeikiene S. Electrical injuries. Medicina. 2007; 43(3):259-66. [DOI:10.3390/medicina43030032]‎

‎3.‎ Saukko P, Knight B. Knights forensic pathology. Abingdon-on-Thames: Taylor & Francis; 2004. [DOI:10.1201/b13642]‎

‎4.‎ Bruner JM. Hazards of electrical apparatus. Anesthesiology. 1967; 28(2):396-425. [DOI:10.1097/00000542-196703000-00023] ‎‎[PMID]‎

‎5.‎ Ferris LP, King BG, Spence PW, Williams HB. Effect of electric shock on the heart. Transactions of the American Institute of ‎Electrical Engineers. 1936; 55(5):498-515. [DOI:10.1109/T-AIEE.1936.5057302]‎

‎6.‎ Barry AJ, Fissue. Techniques of crime scene investigation. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2004.‎

‎7.‎ Wesner ML, Hickie J. Long-term sequelae of electrical injury. Canadian Family Physician. 2013; 59(9):935-9.‎

‎8.‎ Singerman J, Gomez M, Fish JS. Long-term sequelae of low-voltage electrical injury. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 2008; ‎‎29(5):773-7. [DOI:10.1097/BCR.0b013e318184815d] [PMID]‎

‎9.‎ Fish JS, Theman K, Gomez M. Diagnosis of long-term sequelae after low-voltage electrical injury. Journal of Burn Care & Research. ‎‎2012; 33(2):199-205. [DOI:10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182331e61] [PMID]‎

‎10.‎ Najari F, Soleimani L, Najari D. Filicide by electrocution. International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Forensic Medicine. 2019; ‎‎9(1):39-44. [DOI:10.22037/ijmtfm.v9i1(Winter).22359]‎

‎11.‎ Schaefer NR, Yaxley JP, O’Donohue P, Lisec C, Jeyarajan E. Electrical burn causing a unique pattern of neurological injury. Plastic ‎and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. 2015; 3(4):e378 [DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000000344] [PMID] [PMCID]‎

‎12.‎ Aygün D, Gönüllü H. The myopathic effects of electrical injury. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2010; 16(3):225-8. [PMID]‎

‎13.‎ Ramati A, Pliskin NH, Keedy S, Erwin RJ, Fink JW, Bodnar EN, et al. Alteration in functional brain systems after electrical injury. ‎Journal of Neurotrauma. 2009; 26(10):1815-22. [DOI:10.1089/neu.2008.0867] [PMID] [PMCID]‎




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32598/ijmtfm.v9i4.25995