• Logo
  • SBMUJournals

Collo-Diaphyseal Angle as an Optimal Anthropometric Criterion of Femur in Gender Determination

Mitra Akhlaghi, Abbas Azizian, Mohammad Hossein Sadeghian, Farhad Azizian, Zohreh Shahabi Zohreh Shahabi, Shima Rafiee, Farinaz Mousavi
34

Views

PDF

Abstract

Background: Gender determination is an important challenge in the identification of skeletal remnants and dismembered bodies. The femur bone is more likely to be preserved during accidents and over time; thus, it is one of the most useful bones in gender determination.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 54 fresh femur pairs of ˃19-year-old Iranians without anomalies or trauma. We studied the length of the femur, vertical head diameter, bicondylar width, shaft angle with the horizon, and collo-diaphyseal angle in male and female samples. Data were analyzed in SPSS using t-test and Receiver Operating Characteristic curves. P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results: The samples’ mean age was 37 years in males and 41 years in females. The mean values of measurements were not significantly different between the left and right femurs (P>0.05). The vertical head diameter, maximum length, bicondylar width, and the shaft angle were significantly larger in the males, compared to females. The mean degree of collo-diaphyseal angle was significantly wider in females, compared to males (P<0.05). The highest precision of gender differentiation belonged to the collo-diaphyseal angle (96.3%) and the lowest one belonged to the vertical head diameter (77.8%).

Conclusion: Based on our findings, even with the existence of only one femur bone, gender determination can be achieved with high precision. Collo-diaphyseal angle would be helpful in gender determination, even with the sole availability of the proximal part of the femur.


Keywords

Forensic anthropology, Gender determination, Femur, Collo-diaphyseal angle, Identification

References

‎1.‎ Chandrakanth H, Kanchan T, Krishan K. Osteometric analysis for gendering of modern sternum-An autopsy study ‎from South India. Legal Medicine. 2014; 16(6):350-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.legalmed.2014.07.007] [PMID]‎

‎2.‎ Krishan K, Chatterjee PM, Kanchan T, Kaur S, Baryah N, Singh R. A review of gender estimation techniques during ‎examination of skeletal remains in forensic anthropology casework. Forensic Science International. 2016; 261:165.e1-‎‎.e8. [DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.02.007]‎

‎3.‎ Krishan K, Kanchan T, Passi N, DiMaggio JA. Genderual dimorphism in foot length ratios among North Indian ‎adolescents. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2015; 36:96-101. [DOI:10.1016/j.jflm.2015.09.007] [PMID]‎

‎4.‎ Utkualp N, Ercan I. Anthropometric measurements usage in medical sciences. BioMed Research International. 2015; ‎‎2015(40426):1-7. [DOI:10.1155/2015/404261]‎

‎5.‎ Akhlaghi M, Dorooshy G, Naghsh A, Karbakhsh Davari M. [Gender determination using patella metrical ‎measurements: Iranian cadavers (Persian)]. Tehran University Medical Journal. 2009; 67(3):190-5.‎

‎6.‎ Saukko P, Knight B. Knight’s Forensic Pathology. 4th Edition. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2015.‎

‎7.‎ Eftekhar vaghefi SH, Elyasi L, Akbari H, Rashidzade A, Zeiai A, Eftekhar vaghefi S. Determination of ratio of ‎clavicle bone length to height in men and women 20-30 years old of Kerman. The Scientific Journal of Rehabilitation ‎Medicine. 2014; 3(1):8-14. [DOI:10.5812/thrita.11669]‎

‎8.‎ Montagu A, Brožek J. A Handbook of Anthropometry. Illinois: Charles C Thomas Publisher; 1960. ‎‎[DOI:10.1037/12018-000]‎

‎9.‎ Pillai TJ, Devi CKL, Devi TS. Osteometric Studies on Human Femurs. IOSR-JDMS. 2014; 13(2):34-9. ‎‎[DOI:10.9790/0853-13213439]‎

‎10.‎ Alunni V, Jardin P, Nogueira L, Buchet L, Quatrehomme G. Comparing discriminant analysis and neural network ‎for the determination of gender using femur head measurements. Forensic Science International. 2015; 253:81-7. ‎‎[DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.05.023] [PMID]‎

‎11.‎ Kanz F, Fitzl C, Vlcek A, Frommlet F. Gender estimation using the femur of Austrians born in the 19th to the middle ‎of the 20th century. Anthropologischer Anzeiger. 2015; 72(1):117-27. [DOI:10.1127/anthranz/2014/0475] [PMID]‎

‎12.‎ Keats TE, Smith TH. Atlas of normal developmental roentgen anatomy. Maryland Heights, Missouri: Mosby; 1987.‎

‎13.‎ Fawcett T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters. 2006; 27(8):861-74. ‎‎[DOI:10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010]‎

‎14.‎ Wang J, Tsang WW, Marsaglia G. Evaluating Kolmogorov’s distribution. Journal of Statistical Software. 2003; 8(18). ‎‎[DOI:10.18637/jss.v008.i18]‎

‎15.‎ Akhlaghi M, Khalighi Z, Vasigh S, Yousefinejad V. Gender determination using mandibular anthropometric ‎parameters in subadult Iranian samples. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2014; 22:150-3. ‎‎[DOI:10.1016/j.jflm.2013.12.006] [PMID]‎

‎16.‎ Gaballah IF, Shehab AM, Bayoumi KA. Gender determination in femurs of modern Egyptians: A comparative study ‎between metric measurements and SRY gene detection. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2014; 4(4):109-15. ‎‎[DOI:10.1016/j.ejfs.2014.08.007]‎

‎17.‎ Harma A, Karakas HM. Determination of gender from the femur in Anatolian Caucasians: a digital radiological ‎study. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2007; 14(4):190-4. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcfm.2006.05.008]‎

‎18.‎ Lee JH, Kim YS, Jeong YG, Lee NS, Han SY, Tubbs RS, et al. Gender determination from partial segments and ‎maximum femur lengths in Koreans using computed tomography. Folia Morphologica. 2014; 73(3):353-8. ‎‎[DOI:10.5603/FM.2014.0052]‎

‎19.‎ Mall G, Graw M, Gehring K-D, Hubig M. Determination of gender from femora. Forensic Science International. 2000; ‎‎113(1-3):315-21. [DOI:10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00240-1]‎

‎20.‎ Mitra A, Khadijeh B, Vida AP, Ali RN, Farzaneh M, Maryam VF, et al. Gendering based on measurements of the ‎femoral head parameters on pelvic radiographs. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2014; 23:70-5. ‎‎[DOI:10.1016/j.jflm.2014.01.004]‎

‎21.‎ Soni G, Dhall U, Chhabra S. Determination of gender from femur: discriminant analysis. Journal of the Anatomical ‎Society of India. 2010; 59(2):216-21. [DOI:10.1016/S0003-2778(10)80029-2]‎

‎22.‎ Yoshioka Y, Siu D, Cooke T. The anatomy and functional axes of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987; 69(6):873-‎‎80. [DOI:10.2106/00004623-198769060-00012] [PMID]‎

‎23.‎ Alunni-Perret V, Staccini P, Quatrehomme G. Gender determination from the distal part of the femur in a French ‎contemporary population. Forensic Science International. 2008; 175(2-3):113-7. ‎‎[DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.05.018]‎

‎24.‎ Hussain F, Abdul Kadir MR, Zulkifly AH, Sa’at A, Aziz AA, Hossain MG, et al. Anthropometric measurements of ‎the human distal femur: A study of the adult Malay population. BioMed Research International. 2013; ‎‎2013(175056):1-5. [Doi:10.1155/2013/175056]‎

‎25.‎ Tahir A, Hassan AW, Umar IM. A study of the collodiaphyseal angle of the femur in the North-Eastern Sub-Region ‎of Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Medicine. 2001; 10(1):34-6.‎

‎26.‎ Bhattacharya S, Chakraborty P, Mukherjee A. Correlation between neck shaft angle of femur with age and ‎anthropometry: A radiographic study. Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research. 2014; 3(3):100-7.‎

‎27.‎ Godycki M. [On the certainty of gender determination from the femur, the ulna and the humerus (French)]. Bulletins ‎et Mémoires de la Société d’anthropologie de Paris. 1957; 8(5):405-10. [DOI:10.3406/bmsap.1957.2688]‎




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32598/ijmtfm.v9i2.24986