Comparison of Intravenous Midazolam Drip with Intermittent Intravenous Diazepam in the Treatment of Refractory Serial Seizures in Children

Afshin FAYYAZI, Parvaneh KARIMZADEH, Saadat TORABIAN, Somayeh DAMADI, Ali KHAJEH

Abstract


1606

How to Cite this Article: Fayyazi A, Karimzadeh P, Torabian S, Damadi S, Khaje A. Comparison of Intravenous Midazolam Drip with Intermittent Intravenous Diazepam in The Treatment of Refractory Serial Seizures in Children. Iran J Child Neurol 2012; 6(3): 15-19.

 

Objective

Serial seizures occur commonly in inpatient epileptic children. This type ofseizure due to its characteristics has a significant impact on the patient’s health.Untreated serial seizures lead to status epilepticus; therefore, finding a moreeffective treatment for such patients is essential. This study was performed tocompare the outcome of intermittent intravenous diazepam in the pediatricneurology clinic and intravenous midazolam in the pediatric intensive care unit(PICU), in order to introduce an alternative treatment for serail seizures.

Materials & Methods

In this study, 38 inpatient children aged 6 mo-15 years with refractory serialseizures were treated by first line antiepileptic drugs and then randomlytreated with either intermittent intravenous diazepam in the neurology ward orintravenous midazolam in PICU.

Results

Fourteen (70%) diazepam group patients and 13 (72.2%) midazolam grouppatients had good response to treatment, there was no significant differencebetween the two groups. Four midazolam group patients and two diazepamgroup patients needed mechanical ventilation and were intubated duringtreatment, with no significant difference between the two groups. Durationsof mechanical ventilation and PICU and hospital stay were not significantlydifferent between the two groups.

Conclusion

Intermittent intravenous diazepam is an effective alternative therapy formidazolam drip in the treatment of serial seizures due to similar therapeuticeffects and fewer side effects.

References

  1. Haut SR. Seizure clustering. Epilepsy Behav 2006Feb;8(1):50-5.
  2. Caraballo RH, Cersosimo RO, Fejerman N. Benign focal seizures of adolescence: a prospective study. Epilepsia 2004 Dec;45(12):1600-3.
  3. Haut SR, Swick C, Freeman K, Spencer S. Seizureclustering during epilepsy monitoring. Epilepsia 2002 Jul;43(7):711-5.
  4. Yen DJ, Chen C, Shih YH, Guo YC, Liu LT, Yu HY,et al. Antiepileptic drug withdrawal in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy undergoing presurgical video-EEG monitoring. Epilepsia 2001 Feb;42(2):251-5.
  5. Rose AB, McCabe PH, Gilliam FG, Smith BJ, Boggs JG,Ficker DM et al. Occurrence of seizure clusters and status epilepticus during inpatient video-EEG monitoring.Neurology 2003 Mar;60(6):975-8.
  6. Newmark ME, Dubinsky S. The significance of seizure clustering: a review of 343 outpatients in an epilepsy clinic. In:Dreifuss FE, editor. Chronopharmacology intherapy of the epilepsies. New York: Raven Press; 1990.p. 89-103.
  7. Newmark ME, Penry JK. Catamenial epilepsy. In: Dam,Gram L, Penry JK. editors. Advances in epileptology:XII Epilepsy International Symposium.1980. p. 433-9.
  8. 8. Bauer J, Burr W. Course of chronic focal epilepsy resistantto anticonvulsant treatment. Seizure 2001 Jun;10(4):239-46.
  9. 9. Balish M, Albert PS, Theodore WH. Seizure frequencyin intractable partial epilepsy:a statistical analysis.Epilepsia 1991 Sep-Oct;32(5):642-9.
  10. Lombroso CT. Intermittent home treatment of status andclusters of seizures. Epilepsia 1989;30 (Suppl 2):S11-4.
  11. Mitchell WG. Status epilepticus and acute repetitiveseizures in children, adolescents and young adults:etiology, outcome and treatment. Epilepsia. 1996; 37(Suppl 1):S74-80.
  12. Haut SR, Shinnar S, Moshe SL, O’Dell C, Legatt AD.The association between seizure clustering and status epilepticus in patients with intractable complex partial seizures. Epilepsia. 1999 Dec;40(12):1832-4.
  13. Dreifuss FE, Rosman NP, Cloyd JC, Pellock JM,Kuzniecky RI, Lo WD et al. A comparison of rectaldiazepam gel and placebo for acute repetitive seizures.New Engl J Med. 1998 Jun;338(26):1869-75.
  14. Kriel RL, Cloyd JC, Hadsall RS, Carlson AM, Floren KL,Jones-Saete CM. Home use of rectal diazepam for clusterand prolonged seizures: efficacy, adverse reactions,quality of life, and cost analysis. Pediatr Neurol. 1991Jan-Feb;7(1):13-7.
  15. Ozdemir D, Gulezb P, Uranb N, Yendur G, Kavakli T,Aydin A. Efficacy of continuous midazolam infusion andmortality in childhood refractory generalized convulsive status epilepticus. Seizure. 2005 Mar;14(2) 129-32.
  16. 16. Bhattacharyya M, Kalra V, Gulati S. Intranasal midazolam vs rectal diazepam in acute childhood seizures. PediatrNeurol. 2006 May;34(5):355-9.
  17. Lahat E, Goldman M, Barr J, Bistritzer T, BerkovitchM. Comparison of intranasal midazolam with intravenous diazepam for treating febrile seizures in children:prospective randomised study. BMJ. 2000Jul;321(7253):83-6.
  18. Hayashi K, Osawa M, Aihara M, Haginoya K, KatoI, Kaneko K et al; Research Committee on Clinical Evidence of Medical Treatment for Status Epilepticusin Childhood. Efficacy of intravenous midazolam forstatus epilepticus in childhood. Pediatr Neurol. 2007Jun;36(6):366-72.
  19. Scott RC, Besag FM, Neville BG. Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomised trial. Lancet.1999 Feb;353(9153):623-26.

Keywords


Seizures, Refractory; Children; Midazolam; Diazepam

Full Text:

PDF

249



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22037/ijcn.v6i3.3532

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)