Drivers' Attitudes towards Enforcement Speed Countermeasure on the Golestan Highway

Fahimeh Jafari--- Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Golestan University, Gorgan, Iran,
Seyed Rasoul Davoodi--- Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Golestan University, Gorgan, Iran



Background and Objectives: Driving with an unauthorized speed is one of the most important human impacts on traffic event occurrences, which results in death or severe disabilities. Not regarding the speed limits by drivers In Iran, is known as one of the effective factors in vigorous accidents and resulting in death. So the main goal of this project has been the investigation of driver’s attitudes toward the restricted speed plan in Golestan state’s highways.

Materials and Methods: This project has been practical in state of goal and also survey- descriptive in state of execution. And its statistical society has been all the drivers passing highways that 240 car drivers and 60 truck drivers were chosen by simple random sampling method, and evaluated by questionnaire. The questions had been about social and economic features and drivers attitude toward the policies of speed restricting, considering different situations.

Results: The outcomes showed that 68.4 percent of car drivers and 73.3 percent of truck drivers were agree with accurate speed restricting policy; and speed being controlled by the police or speed camera installation, makes the drivers reduce their speed more than when seeing warning signs or hearing media operations. But more investigation showed that the drivers who were driving at highest speeds were younger ones and had crashes before. So based on these outcomes, it can be concluded that there is a meaningful connection between crashes, fine bills and maximum speed.

Conclusion: The ongoing project shows the car and truck drivers’ attitude toward assessments of speed restricting in Golestan state’s highways, it can help politicians with developing effective and appropriate speed restricting plans in InterCity’s highways.

How to cite this article: Jafari F, Davoodi SR. Drivers' Attitudes towards Enforcement Speed Countermeasure on the Golestan Highway. J Saf Promot Inj Prev. 2016; 4(1): 55-62.














Drivers' attitudes, enforcement, speed, highway

Full Text:




Highway Geometric Design Code No. 415, Office of Deputy for Strategic Supervision Department of Technical Affairs, 2012.

Aarts, L, Van Schagen, I.Driving speed and the risk of road crashes: A review. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2006;38(2): 215-24.

Montella A, Imbriani LL. Safety performance functions incorporating design consistency variables. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2015;74:133-44.

Montella A. A comparative analysis of hotspot identification methods. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2010 Mar 31;42(2):571-81.

Montella A. Identifying crash contributory factors at urban roundabouts and using association rules to explore their relationships to different crash types. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2011 Jul 31;43(4):1451-63.

Yannis G, Papadimitriou E, Theofilatos A. Pedestrian gap acceptance for mid-block street crossing. Transportation planning and technology. 2013 Jul 1;36(5):450-62.

Montella A, Andreassen D, Tarko A, Turner S, Mauriello F, Imbriani L, Romero M. Crash databases in Australasia, the European Union, and the United States: review and prospects for improvement. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2013 Dec 1(2386):128-36.

Elvik R. Why some road safety problems are more difficult to solve than others. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2010 Jul 31;42(4):1089-96.

Forward SE. An assessment of what motivates road violations. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour. 2009 May 31;12(3):225-34.

Forward SE. Intention to speed in a rural area: Reasoned but not reasonable. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour. 2010 Jul 31;13(4):223-32.

Ewing R, Dumbaugh E. The built environment and traffic safety a review of empirical evidence. Journal of Planning Literature. 2009 May 1;23(4):347-67.

Zangiabadi A, Shiran Gh, Geshtil Kh. Investigate the Causes of Accidents on Highway. Rahvar Research studies.2012;1(1).

Ahadi MR, Pejmanzad P, Ardebili PB. The epidemiology of accident fatalities in Iran (8-year review). Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention. 2015 Aug 16;2(4):329-38.

Bakhtiyari M, Soori H, Ainy E, Salehi M, Mehmandar MR. The Survey of the Role of Humans’ Risk Factors in the Severity of Road Traffic Injuries on Urban and Rural Roads. Journal of Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention. 2015; 2(1): 1-8.

Monsef V, Asadi P. Mortality due to road traffic injuries in Guilan province in 2011-2012. Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention. 2015 Sep 23;3(2):97-102.

Barbari, M. Esmaili, A. The Role of Personality Characteristics in Risky Driving. The 10th International Conference on Traffic and Transportation Engineering, November 2010 Tehran

Roads Safety Aspects. Ministry of Roads and Transportation Deputy of Education Research and Technology, 2011.

Ryeng NH, Vlachou A, Doulkeridis C, Nørvåg K. Efficient distributed top-k query processing with caching. InDatabase Systems for Advanced Applications 2011 Apr 22 (pp. 280-295). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Goldenbeld C, van Schagen I. The credibility of speed limits on 80km/h rural roads: The effects of road and person (ality) characteristics. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2007 Nov 30;39(6):1121-30.

Anastasopoulos PC, Mannering FL. A note on modeling vehicle accident frequencies with random-parameters count models. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2009 Jan 31;41(1):153-9.

Shim J, Park SH, Chung S, Jang K. Enforcement avoidance behavior near automated speed enforcement areas in Korean expressways. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2015 Jul 31;80:57-66.


  • There are currently no refbacks.