Evaluating and Comparison of Fuzzy Logic and Analytical Hierarchy Process in Ranking and Quantitative Safety Risk Analysis (Case Study: A combined cycle power plant)

Taleb Askaripoor--- Occupational Health Engineering Deprtment, Faculty of Health, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Iran,
Elaheh Kazemi--- Occupational Health Engineering Deprtment, Faculty of Health, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Iran,
Hamed Aghaei--- PhD student in Occupational Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran,
Mostafa Marzban--- MS in Chemical Engineering, Islamic Azad University of Shahrood, Iran.




Background and Objectives: Accidents prevention and protecting of human capital as the main element in the development of any country is important. This study aimed to use the best available techniques for identifying hazards and assessing risks, in lodge to improve safety, bring down accidents and costs and save time.


Materials and Methods: To identify hazards, a documentation review was used, interviews with experts, brainstorming sessions, knowledge and experience group of experts in occupational health and safety engineering were employed. Finally the risks were ranked and compared based on using the degree of Belief approach in Fuzzy logic and Analytical Hierarchy Process methods.


 Results: In the present survey, among of the 11 instances of identifying hazards, explosion and fire gas turbines and bust steam pipes under pressure ranked in the first spot and drop down in tanks reservoirs and canals had second place. It was also noted that the effect of the two methods used in this study, are together compatible and consistent.


Conclusion: Using the Fuzzy Logic with Multi Criteria Decision Making techniques such as AHP are providing appropriate and complementary approach to identify priorities in the safety control system. In fact, when the decision-makers agree in determining the adjusted data, using these two independent methods will follow the same results in the risk rating.


How to cite this article:

Askaripoor T, Kazemi E, Aghaei H, Marzban M. Evaluating and Comparison of Fuzzy Logic and Analytical Hierarchy Process in Ranking and Quantitative Safety Risk Analysis (Case Study: A combined cycle power plant). J Saf Promot Inj Prev. 2015; 3(3):169-74.



Analytical Hierarchy Process, Fuzzy logic, Combined cycle power plant, Risk assessment, Accident

Full Text:




Dastjerdi E, Mohammadfam I. Comparing the two methods tree error analysis and Trippod Beta with hierarchical analysis of the analysis of the incidents of steel industry. Faculty of Health magazine and Health Research Institute. 2013;10(1): 43-52.

Ministry of Health and Medical Education. Epidemiology of External injuries in Islamic republic of Iran. Tehran: Ministry of Health and Medical Education2005.

Wadsworth E, Simpson S, Moss S, Smith A. The Bristol Stress and Health Study: Accidents, minor injuries and cognitive failures at work. Occupational Medicine.2003; 53(6):392-99.

Ergor OA, Demiral Y, Piyal YB. A significant outcome of work life: occupational accidents in a developing country, Turkey. Journal of Occupational Health. 2003; 45(1):74-80.

Flin R, Mearns K, O’Connor P, Bryden R. Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features. Safety Science. 2000; 34(1-3): 177-92.

Fam IM, Kianfar A, Faridan M. Application of Tripod-Beta Approach and Map–Overlaying Technique to Analyze Occupational Fatal Accidents in a Chemical Industry in Iran. International journal of occupational hygiene. 2010;2(1):30-6.

Levy B, Wegman D, Halperin W. Occupational Health: Recognizing and Preventing Work-Related Disease and Injury. 4, editor. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Williams; 2000.

Joyani Y, Raadabadi M, Kavosi Z, Sadeghifar J, Momenei K. Relationship between the occupational accidents and absence from work employees in Shiraz Namazi Hospital. Payavard Salamat. 2011;5(3):70-9.

Eshagi M, Gholmohamadi R, Rahimi M. prioritise control methods in Hamedan Glass Company using the hierarchical analysis. Quarterly Journal of health and safety at work 2013; 3(3): 75-85.

Pokoradi L. Fuzzy logic-based risk assessment. AARMS, Academic and Applied Research in Military Science. 2002;1(1):63-73.

Zegordi H, Rezaee E, Nazari A, Honari F. Provide a model for risk reduction in power plant project based multi-objective optimization approach and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Energy Economics Studies. 2011; 31: 161-95.

Mirza S, Jafari MJ, Omidvari M, Miri Lavasani SMR. The application of Fuzzy logic to determine the failure probability in Fault Tree Risk Analysis. Journal of Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention.2014; 2(2): 113-23.

Khakpour AR, Samiei Zafarghandi A. Model for safety performance evaluation based on organizational factors affecting safety industries using Fuzzy Inference System. Journal of Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention.2015; 3(1): 25-34.

adic D, Djapan M, Misita M, Stefanovic M, Milanovic DD. A fuzzy model for assessing risk of occupational safety in the processing industry. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 2012;18(2):115-26.

Godsi poor H. Issues in multi-criteria decision. tehran: amir kabir university; 2002.

Azar A, Memariani A. AHP: The new technique for group decision-making. Science and Management. 1994; 27: 22-33.

Indelicato G. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide). 4, editor. Maryland: Wiley Online Library; 2008.

Lidong D, Dongxiao H, Haitao L, Bingen K, editors. Risk Assessment of Thermal Power Plant Project Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in the Early Operation. Computer Science and Engineering, 2009 WCSE’09 Second International Workshop on; 2009: IEEE.

Zebardast E. Application of analytic hierarchy process in urban and regional planning. HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA. 2002;10:13-22.

Petrovic R, Petrovic D. Multicriteria ranking of inventory replenishment policies in the presence of uncertainty in customer demand. International Journal of Production Economics. 2001; 71(1-3): 439-446.

Taleghani M, Shahroodi K, Saneiin F. Comparative than AHP rank purchase preferences. Research magazine in operation and its applications. 2013; 1(32): 81-91.

Özdağoğlu A, Özdağoğlu G. Comparison of AHP and fuzzy AHP for the multi-criteria decision making processes with linguistic evaluations. 2007.

Jozi S A, Al sadat A. Health-Safety And Environmental Risk Assessment of PowerPlants Using Multi Criteria Decision Making Method. Chemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quarterly. 2011; 17(4): 437−49.

Jozi S A, Safarian SH. risk analysis of environmental gas stations abadan by TOPSIS method. 2010; of the environment. 2011; 37(58): 50-66.

Ahadi MR, Pavizian H. Identifying and Prioritization of the Factors in the Use of Child Safety Seats(Case Study of Northen Khorasan Province). Journal of Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention. 2014; 2(2): 95-102.


  • There are currently no refbacks.