Path Dependency as a Method for Historical Sociology of Medicine: A Historical Paradigm for Medical Knowledge

Fateme Rafiei Atani, Mohsen Naseri Rad, Janet Mikaeilian, Ehsan Kheirkhahzade

Abstract


74

Historical research has always tried to deal with those past actions of human that have a social sense, and the phenomena related to historical sociology of medicine can be explained appropriately by the method of path dependency. This article is mainly aimed at developing the path dependency analysis as an effective approach in the study of historical sociology of medicine. In this study, in order to study the full details of medical cases, the findings of the conceptual grounds have been compared with the supporting documentation. The results indicate that in the framework of path dependency, two major sequences may be studied. The first type is called the path dependency analysis of self-strengthening sequence. These sequences are first shaped and then reproduce an institutional model of medicine. The second type of the path dependency of analysis is called reaction sequence. In path dependency, the researcher pays a special attention to the final link of the chain, which is regarded as the result. Path dependency studies emphasize the deviating cases of medicine too. Historical orientation in all aspects of sociology is improving, but no unique orientation is necessarily observed in any of the cases. Path dependency analysis is not inherently good or bad. Rather, it is a potential method in the historical sociology of medicine, and it can be regarded as a historical paradigm for medical knowledge.


Keywords


analytical approach; historical sociology; medical history; medical institution; path dependency

Full Text:

PDF

43

References


آرمسترانگ، دیوید.، توکل، محمد. (1387). جامعه شناسی پزشکی، تهران: انتشارات حقوقی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی و خدمات بهداشتی درمانی شهید بهشتی، مرکز تحقیقات اخلاق و حقوق پزشکی.

ادیب حاج باقری، محسن.، پرویزی، سرور.، صلصالی، مهوش. (1386). روش های تحقیق کیفی، تهران: بشری و تحفه.

استنفورد، مایکل. (1382). درآمدی بر فلسفه تاریخ، ترجمه احمد گل محمدی، تهران: نشر نی.

اسکاچپول، تدا. (1388). دستور کارهای نوظهور و راهبردهای تکرارشونده در جامعه شناسی تاریخی. در بینش و روش در جامعه شناسی، تدا اسکاچپول (صص 491-539)، ترجمه هاشم آقاجری، تهران: نشر مرکز.

پوپر، کارل. (1350). فقر تاریخیگری، ترجمه احمد آرام، تهران: خوارزمی.

ساعی، علی. (1386). روش تحقیق در علوم اجتماعی (با رهیافت عقلانیت انتقادی)، تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کنب علوم انسانی دانشگاه ها (سمت).

شرت، ایون. (1390). فلسفه علوم اجتماعی قاره ای: هرمنوتیک، تبارشناسی و نظریه انتقادی از یونان باستان تا قرن بیست و یکم، ترجمه هادی جلیلی، تهران: نشر نی.

فی، برایان. (1386). فلسفه امروزین علوم اجتماعی: نگرش چند فرهنگی، ترجمه خشایار دیهیمی، تهران: طرح نو.

کلاک، کیتسن.، رابرتس، جورج سیدنی. (1362). مقدمه‌ای بر روش تحقیق در تاریخ، ترجمهً اوانس اوانسیان، تهران: اساطیر.

مسعودنیا، ابراهیم. (1389). جامعه شناسی پزشکی، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.

مکالا، سیبیین. (1387). بنیادهاي علم تاریخ، چیستی و اعتبار شناخت تاریخی، ترجمۀ احمد گل محمدي، تهران: نشر نی.

نوذري، حسینعلی. (1387). فلسفه تاریخ، روش شناسی و تاریخ نگاري، تهران: طرح نو.

وایت، کوین. (1391). درآمدی بر جامعه شناسی سلامت و بیماری، ترجمة محسن ناصری راد، تهران: انتشارات حقوقی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی و خدمات بهداشتی درمانی شهید بهشتی، مرکز تحقیقات اخلاق و حقوق پزشکی، انجمن علمی حقوق پزشکی ایران.

Béland, Daniel. (2010). Policy change and health care research. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 35 (4): 615–41.

Brown, Lawrence D. (2010). Pedestrian paths: Why path-dependence theory leaves health policy analysis lost in space, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 35 (4): 643–61.

Danto, Elizabeth Ann. (2008). Historical research, 1th ed, USA: Oxford University Press.

Dray, W. H. (1993). Philosophy of history, 2nded, Prentice Hall, Inc.

Feder-Bubis, Paula., Chinitz, David. (2010). Punctuated equilibrium and path dependency in coexistence: The Israeli health system and theories of change, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 35 (4): 595–614.

Geuss, R. (1999). Nietsche and genealogy. In morality, culture and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Haeder, Simon F. (2012). Beyond path dependence: Explaining healthcare reform and its consequences, The Policy Studies Journal (40) S1: 65-86.

Lewenson, Sandra B., Herrmann, Eleanor Krohn. (2007). Why do historical research? In Capturing nursing history: a guide to historical methods in research (pp. 1-18), Sandra B Lewenson and Eleanor Krohn Herrmann, 1th ed, Springer Publishing Company.

Liebowitz, S. J., Margolis, S. E. (1995). Path dependence, lock-in, and history. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 11: 205-226.

Light, D.J.R. (2008). Comparing health care systems: lessons from east and West Germany. In Peter Conrad, Sociology of health and illness: critical perspectives, 8th ed, New York: St Martins.

Mahoney, James. (2000). Path dependence in historical sociology, theory and society (29) 4: 507-548.

Mahoney, James. (2003). Strategies of causal assessment, In Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences edited by James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mahoney, James. (2005). Comparative historical methods, In Handbook of qualitative research, N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln, 2th ed, pp. 83-101, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Mandelbaum, Maurice. (1983). The problem of historical knowledge, Johns Hopkins University Press.

Morgan, M., Calnan, M., Manning, N. (1985). Sociological approaches to health and medicine, London, Croom Helm.

Page, Scott E. (2006). Path dependence, Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1: 87–115.

Pfau-Effinger, Birgit. (2004). Culture and path dependency of welfare state development, paper presented at the ESPANET conference.

Sreedharan, E. (2007). A manual of historical research methodology, South Indian Studies.

Wilsford, David. (2010). The Logic of policy change: structure and agency in political life. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 35 (4): 663–80.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License CC BY-NC 4.0. Copyright © 2016 Medical History JournalAll rights reserved.  All credits and honors to PKP for their OJS.

For Author | Online Submission | About Contact