Animals’ rights in Biomedical research

Abdolhasan Kazemi, Naser Razmaraee, Bahram Samadi Rad

Abstract


127

This article reviews recent literature on dogmatic issues of animal rights in research fields, focusing primarily on previous and current concept of animal rights in medical research.The ethics of animal-based medical research is a continuing area of debate that has a complex overlap with law, social opinions, NGOs ideas, but mainly ethical research protocols do not create crucial limitation to scientist in lab and research fields.

Basically there is wide and albeit beneficial need for informed consideration and interchanges between the ethicists, scientists and researchers, policymakers, lawyers, NGOs and the public in general to come to consensus regarding the issues discussed about animal rights and welfares in medical research fields.

Current animal experimentation and use of animals as clinical and laboratory models were established by Bernard Claude who described: "An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine" in 1865. At this stage, the public opinions were already asking that the welfare, pain and distress of experimental animals during medical research be reduced. In 1959, two scientists, William Russell and Rex Burch projected the philosophy and doctrine of alternatives to animal experimentation as clinical models, the "3Rs". Since these two scientist doctrine time, animal rights and welfare campaigners have promoted the 3Rs concept in biomedical research communities and environments. Despite this accepted doctrine, spiteful animal experiments have continued and there are reports of radical and cure extremists showing their opposition by invasion, arson, theft and even bombing of institutions involved, resulting in killing of the animals that has been called “live slaughtering”. SHAC (Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty), one radical group supposed to be animal welfare supporters was recognized as a terrorist band in USA and the police inspected their activities extremely. In 2001, British animal radicalists attacked Japanese universities and stole laboratory equipments and resources; one individual was detained and sentenced to jail; Japanese who assisted in the incident were arrested and also one was sentenced to jail. In 2006, SHAC group in USA were arrested and sentenced to jail for their terrorism behaviors and activities including arson.

Recently, the animal welfare law world widely was revised during last decade stressing the importance of 3Rs in scientific activities with animals. The outcome of these activities particularly 3Rs could be a better experimental design, on both ethical and scientific grounds in medical research areas. It is worth noted that beside 3Rs some other active NGOs about animal rights have been postulated that: “an animal's welfare should be governed by five freedoms, namely, freedom from hunger and thirst, freedom from discomfort, freedom from pain, injury or disease, freedom to express normal behavior and freedom from fear and distress”.


Keywords


Animal rights; Research and lab experiments; Ethical Codes

Full Text:

PDF

1021

References


مقيمي‌حاجی، ابوالقاسم ـ (1385ش.)، حقوق حيوانات در اسلام، پژوهشكده باقرالعلوم (ع)، انتشارات نورالسجاد

نورمحمدي، شيما ـ (1384 ش.)، گستره حقوق حیوانات در اسلام و غرب (قسمت اول و دوم)، فصلنامه فقه و حقوق اسلامي (نشريه مرکز تحقيقات واحد خواهران دانشگاه امام صادق ع).

عباسی، محمود ـ (1383 ش.)، حقوق پزشکی. انتشارات حقوقی، تهران

مبشر، مینا؛ آرامش، کیارش؛ آل داود، سید جاوید؛ اشرف کنجوی، نرگس اشرف؛ دیوسالار، کورس؛ لاریجانی، باقر ـ (1387 ش.)، راهکارهای عملی اجرای دستورالعمل اخلاقی استفاده از حیوانات آزمایشگاهی در پژوهش کشور، مجله دیابت و لپید ایران 1388 ش.، (8) 2

نجم‌آبادی، محمود؛ ولایتی، علی‌‌اکبر ـ (1369 ش.)، سوگندنامه پزشکی، مجموعه مقالات صاحب نظران در اخلاق پزشکی، تهران، واحد چاپ معاونت پژوهشی وزارت بهداشت، درمان و آموزش پزشکی

کاظمی، عبدالحسن ـ (1390 ش.)، چالش‌های اخلاقی، فقهی و حقوقی مهندسی ژنتیک و بیوتکنولوژی، پایان‌نامه فلوشیپ اخلاق زیست پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی

نوری دلوئی، محمدرضا؛ نیک‌پور، پروانه ـ (1381 ش.)، حیوانات ترانس ژنیک، مجله دانشکده پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران 60,6,218

كرمي، محمد؛ تقي‌زاده، حامد، رفتار با حيوان آزمايشگاهي از منظر قرآن، مجله اخلاق و تاريخ پزشكي بهمن 1389 ش.، 4(1)

نبويان، سيدمحمود؛ صاحبان حق، معرفت فلسفي بهار 3 )7). 1389 ش.، (پياپي 27)

مبشر، مينا؛ ابوالقاسم‌زاده، نازآفرين؛ بطحايي، فتانه‌سادات؛ آرامش، كيارش؛ اردشيرلاريجاني، محمدباقر، آگاهي، نگرش و عملکرد نسبت به رعايت اصول اخلاقي در پژوهش بر روي حيوانات آزمايشگاهي، اخلاق در علوم و فناوري، بهار و تابستان 1386 ش.، 2 (2-1)

مبشر، مينا؛ موسوي، فاطمه؛ نخعي، نوذر؛ شيباني، وحيد، بررسي رعايت اصول اخلاق در پژوهش بر حيوانات آزمايشگاهي به روش كيفي. اخلاق در علوم و فناوري. زمستان 1385 ش.، 1(1)؛ ويژه نامه اخلاق پزشکي

XXXIXth World Congress of the History of Veterinary Medicine, Antalya-TR, 20-23 September 2010. Some Preliminary Notes for Ethical Conduct of Animal Experimentation

http://www.biyoetik.org.tr/makaleler/Ulman%20et%20al.%20Animal%20Experimentation.pdf

Australia’s ethical framework for animals used in research and teaching. Margaret Rose and Elizabeth Grant. 2011.

http://www.daff.gov.au/animal-plant-health/welfare/aaws/aaws_international_animal_welfare_conference/australias_ethical_framework_for_animals_used_in_research_and_teaching

Ale-Davoud SJ, Javadzade-bolouri A, Sadeghi H, Sabzghabie MAM, Latifi SM, Norouzian R. et al. (2006). Preparation of ethic codes for studies on laboratory animals. J Babol Univ Med Sci, 8(3): 55-64

Mobasher M, Aramesh K, Aldavoud SJ, Ashrafganjooei N, K Divsalar, Phillips CJC, Larijani B. (2008). Proposing a National Ethical Framework for Animal Research in Iran , Iranian J Publ Health. A supplementary issue on Bioethics 37, 1: 39-46

Gharebaghi1 R., Vaez Mahdavi2 MR., Ghasemi3 H, Dibaei A. Heidary F. (2007). Animal rights in Islam Proc. 6th World Congress on Alternatives & Animal Use in the Life Sciences,August 21-25, Tokyo, Japan.

Gilmore, A., (1985). The use of animals in research, CAN MED ASSOC G. 132, 1: 564-571

Federation of Animal Science Societies (FASS). 3rd edition Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching. 2010. http://www.fass.org/index.asp?autotry=true&ULnotkn=true

Rose M, Grant ,E. Animal Welfare Committee, National Health & Medical Research Council, Canberra Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, Sydney. 2011. http://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/1/1/69/pdf

Smith JA, van den Broek FAR, Canto Martorell J, Hackbarth H, Ruksenas O, W Zeller. (2007). Principles and practice in ethical review of animal experiments across Europe: summary of the report of a FELASA working group on ethical evaluation of Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (2010) PREPUBLICATION DRAFT Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals Institute for Laboratory Animal Research Division on Earth and Life Studies THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS Washington, D.C., www.nap.edu

Animal experiments, Laboratory Animals Ltd. Laboratory Animals. 41: 143–160


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License

This journal is distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC 4.0. Copyright © 2017 Medical Ethics Journal. All rights reserved. All credits and honors to PKP for their OJS.

For Author | Online Submission | About Contact