Ethical issues of preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Farnaz Shishehgar, Robab Latifnezhad

Abstract


598

 Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is a thechnic which was originally developed for couples at high risk of transmitting a genetic defect. The expanded uses of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in assisted reproduction have raised questions about their ethical acceptability. PGD evolved from IVF technology.  It is an extention of IVF treatment and cannot be undertaken separately. One set of objections arises from the need to create and then select embryos on chromosomal or genetic grounds, with deselected embryos then usually discarded.  A second set of objections arises from the fact of selection itself. The use of PGD to exclude aneuploid embryos from transfer raises few special ethical issues. Another kind of concern is that increasing the frequency and scope of genetic screaning of prospective children will move us toward a eugenic world in which children are valued more for their genotype than for their inherent charachteristics.

PGD has also been used to enable a family with a child with fanconii anemia to have another child who would serve as a source of hematopoeitic stem cells obtained from that child’s umbilical cord blood. The main ethical arguments are the instrumentalization of the child. The parent’s decision to conceive and select a certain embryo would fail to show respect for future child if their only reason for creating the child was its tissue. Conceiving a child to save another is a morally defensible decision on the condition that the child dies without transferring allergenic hematopoietic stem cells.

Another uses of PGD is to select the sex of offspring for family balancing. Some theorisians who are full supportive of using sex selection claims that this kind of sex selection poses no risk harm to anyone. On contrary, the others believed that the attention to the sex of offspring is a sort of gender preference.  

Ethically, PGD with the aim of nonmedical sex selection cannot be acceptable and causes different social consequences.


Keywords


PGD; ethic; sex selection; HLA matching

Full Text:

PDF

243

References


Basillle C, Fryman R, Aly A,Hesters L,Fanchin R,(2009).Preimplantation genetic diagnosis :State of art.European journal of obstetrics& Gynecology and Reproductive biology . 145, p.9-13

BerkowitzJ etal (1998). Racism and sexism in medically assisted conception . Bioethics, 12(1). P.25-44

Beyleveld D (2000). Is embryo research and preimplantation genetic diagnosis ethical ?Forensic Science international,113. p.461-475

Dahl E ,Beutel M, Brosig B, Hinsch D. (2003)Preconception sex selection for non- medical reasons: a retrospective survey from Germany . Human reproduction 18. (10). p.2231-2234

Dahl E(2003) Ethical issues in new uses of preimplantation genetic diagnosis .Human Reproduction 18.(7). p.1368-1369

Devolder K (2004) preimplantation HLA typing :having children to save our loved ones. J Med Ethics, 31. p.582-586

Grant VJ (2006) sex predetermination and the ethics of sex selection . Human reproduction 21(7). p.1659-1661

Harris J (2003) Sex selection and regulated hatred . Journal of medical Ethics 31. p.291-294

Hug Kristina(2005) Sources of human embryos for stem cells research:ethical problems and their possible solution. Medicina (Kaunas). 41(12 ). p.1002-1010

Malpani A, Modi D (2002) preimplantation sex selection for family balancing in India . Human reproduction , 17, 1. p.11-12

MC Dougall R (2005) Acting parentally : An argument against sex selection . J med Ethics 31. p.601-605

Meseguer M, Garrido N, Simon C, Pellicer A, Gender selection Ethical , Scintific , Legal and practical issues . Journal of assisted Reproduction and Genetics 19(9). p.443-446

Packman Wl (1999) psychosocial impact of pediatric BMT on siblings. Bone marrow Transplant 24. p.701-706

Pennings g, Schots R, Liebaers I (2002) Ethical consideration on preimplantation genetic diagnosis for HLA Typing to match a future child as a donor of hematopoetic stem cells to asiblling . Human reproduction 17( 3). p.534-538

Pennins G (2004) Saviour siblings : Using preimplantation genetic diagnosis for tissue typing . International congress series 1266. p.311-317

Redmon RB(1985) How children can be respected as ends yet still be used as subject in non –therapeutic research . J Med Ethics 12. p.77-82

Robertson JA,(2002) Sex selection for gender variety by preimplantation genetic diagnosis . Feril steril 78. p.463-465

Rogers W etal (2007) Is sex selective abortion morally justified and should it be prohibited ? Bioethics,21 ( 9). p.520-534

Savudscu J (1999) sex selection. .Journal of Austrailia 171. p.402-405

Semon KD, Michiel A, Harton G , Motou C , Reppings S (2007) ESHER PGD consortium data collection V1: cycles from january to December 2003 with pregnancy follow up to October 2004. Human reprod, 22. p.323-326

Thomsasma DC (1999) Ethical issues and transplantation techonology .cambr.Quart . Healthcare Ethics . 4. p.333-343

Verlinsky Y, Rechitsky S, School craft W, Storm c (2001b) preimplantation diagnosis for fanconi anemia combined with HLA matching . JAMA, 285. p.2130-2133

Wert G (2005) preimplantayion genetic diagnosis : the ethics of intermediate cases . Human reproduction . 20( 12). p.3261-3266

Wert G de , Mummery C(20030 Human embroyonic stemcells research , ethics and policy . human reprod 18. p.627- 682

Wilkinson S, (2008) sexism sex selection and family balancing , Medical Law Review 16(3). p.369-389

Wolf SM, Kahn JP, Wagner JE (2003) using preimplantation genetic diagnosis to creat a stem donor : Issues , guidlins and limits . J Law Med Ethics 31. p.327-339

Ziberberg J (2007) sex selection and restricting aborton and sex determination .Bioethics , 21(9). p.517-519

Zubair F , Dahl E, Sher Shah S, Ahmad M , Brosig B(2007) . Gender preferences and demand for preconception sex selelection : A survey among pregnant women in Pakistan .Human reproduction. 22(2). p. 605-609.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License

This journal is distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC 4.0. Copyright © 2017 Medical Ethics Journal. All rights reserved. All credits and honors to PKP for their OJS.

For Author | Online Submission | About Contact