Modeling the emission and calculation of the risk of steelmaking contaminants using the AERMOD model

Maral Rashidi Fard, Yousef Rashidi, Majid Amiri



Background and Aims: Nowadays, air pollution has become a major challenge especially in large cities. Considering the paramount importance of air pollutants impact of human health, the study of pollutants emission models to estimate their dispersion and consequent impacts on human health is very important.
Materials and Methods: In this research, CO, NO2 and SO2 emissions from steel complexes, which are the most important pollutants of this industry, is discussed. For this purpose, AERMOD models have been designed to investigate the dispersion of pollutants and then BREEZE AERMOD model to study the risk of emission of pollutants. Finally, the risk of pollutants inhalation was estimated using the RAIS model. The data were collected
statistically. All stages of this research were conducted ethically and relevant permits were obtained.
Results: According to the calculations made in our study, the risk factor for non-cancerous inhalation of air pollutants in the steel complex was 3.7 for employees, 4.8 for workers and 7.7 for office workers, 3.7 for over-threshold workers. These individuals were at risk caused by contaminants, especially carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide.Residents in the neighbor regions demonstrating a risk index of 0.2% are at a lower risk.
Conclusion: Considering the risk assessments made, emissions from steel complexes pose a serious health risk specially for workers. Indeed, due to the close proximity of the surrounding villages in the southern areas of the site to the steel complex flares, they are exposed to the large amounts of contaminants.
Keywords: steel complex, air pollution modeling, breeze aermod, aermod, rias method.

Full Text:



Abril GA, Diez SC, Pignata ML, Britch J. Particulate matter concentrations originating from industrial and urban

sources: Validation of atmospheric dispersion modeling results. Atmospheric Pollution Research 2016; 7(1):180-89.

Boubel RW, Vallero D, Fox DL, Turner B, Stern AC. Fundamentals of Air Pollution. 3rd ed. London: Elsevier;

Moatar F, Atabi F, Karshenas M and Aiat F, Health Effects of Air Pollutants - special economic zone - Energy Pars

(gas refinery case study phases. Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Air Pollution and its Effects on Health 2006

Sep. 6-7; Tehran, Iran (In Persian).

Ashrafi K, Shafiepour M, Salimian M, Momeni MR. Determination and Dispersion Modeling of VOC Emissions

from Liquid Storage Tanks in Asalouyeh Zone. Journal of Environmental Studies 2012; 38(3):47-60 (In Persian).

Seangkiatiyuth K, Surapipith V, Tantrakarnapa K, Lothongkum AW. Application of the AERMOD modeling

system for environmental impact assessment of NO2 emissions from a cement complex. Journal of Environmental

Sciences 2011; 23(6):931-40.

WHO. Promotion of healthy lifestyles. Geneva: World Health Organization 2002.

WHO. IPCS risk assessment terminology. Geneva: World Health Organization 2004.

WHO. Principles for modelling dose-response for the risk assessment of chemicals. Geneva: World Health

Organization 2010.

Hall D, Spanton A, Dunkerley F, Bennett M, Griffiths R. An inter-comparison of the AERMOD, ADMS and ISC

dispersion models for regulatory applications. Bristol: Environment Agency; 2000.

USEPA. Review of the reference dose and reference concentration processes document. Washington: RiskAssessment Forum U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2002.

Mulukutla AN, Varghese GK. Comparison of field monitored and prognostic model generated meteorological

parameters for source dispersion modeling. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment 2015; 1(4):39. https://doi.


Aliyu AS, Ramli AT, Saleh MA. Assessment of potential human health and environmental impacts of a nuclear

power plant (NPP) based on atmospheric dispersion modeling. Atmósfera 2015; 28(1):13-26.

Srinivas C, Venkatesan R, Somayaji K, Indira R. A simulation study of short-range atmospheric dispersion for

hypothetical air-borne effluent releases using different turbulent diffusion methods. Air Quality, Atmosphere &

Health 2009; 2(1):21-28.

Korsakissok I, Mathieu A, Didier D. Atmospheric dispersion and ground deposition induced by the Fukushima

Nuclear Power Plant accident: A local-scale simulation and sensitivity study. Atmospheric Environment 2013;


Zhang Q, Wei Y, Tian W, Yang K. GIS-based emission inventories of urban scale: A case study of Hangzhou,

China. Atmospheric Environment 2008; 42(20):5150-65.

USEPA. Revision to the Guideline on Air Quality Models: Adoption of a Preferred General Purpose (Flat and

Complex Terrain) Dispersion Model and Other Revisions; Final Rule. Washington: U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency 2005.

USEPA. Guideline on Air Quality Models. Washington: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2004.

PeykanPorfard, P; Khorasani, N; Karami, M and Alami,M .Modeling of Air Pollutants Using CDM Software

(Case Study of Mobarakeh Steel Complex in Isfahan). Proceedings of the 8th National Conference on Environmental

Health 2005 Oct. 8-10; Tehran, Iran (In Persian).

Atabi F, Jafarigol F, Momeni M, Salimian M, Bahmannia G. Dispersion Modeling of CO with AERMOD in

South Pars fourth Gas Refinery. Journal of Environmental Health Engineering 2014; 1(4):281-92.


  • There are currently no refbacks.