An experimental investigation of proxy electrocoagulation process efficiency for COD removal from Azithromycin contaminated aqueous solution
26 January 2017
چکیدهBackground and Aims: Pharmaceuticals are considered as emerging environmental pollutants due to their continuous input and persistence in the aquatic ecosystem even at low concentrations. This work focuses on the removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD) from Azithromycin contaminated synthetic aqueous solution through proxy electrocoagulation process.
Materials and Methods: A batch method was used for removal of Azithromycin from water. The parameters affecting on the proxy electrocoagulation of antibiotics and subsequently COD removal efficiency such as reaction time, concentration of hydrogen peroxide, current density and pH of the solution was investigated.
Results: The proxy electrocoagulation process achieved a very high COD removal efficiency (95.6%) with reaction time of 60 min, current density of 20 mA/cm-2 and at pH 3 in the presence of 1.5 mg/L of hydrogen peroxide, producing cleaned water.
Conclusion: Although economically should be investigated compared to other methods, the studied process was useful in terms of Azithromycin removal from aqueous solutions.
Key words: Wastewater, electrocoagulation, Azithromycin, COD
Sayadi MH, Trivedy RK, Pathak RK. Pollution of pharmaceutical in environment. Journal of Industrial Pollution Control 2010; 26(1):89-94.
Gagnon C, Lajeunesse A, Cejka P, Gagne F, Hausler R. Degradation of selected acidic and neutral pharmaceutical products in a primarytreated wastewater by disinfection processes. Ozone: Science and Engineering 2008; 30(5): 387-92.
Dirany A, Sirés I, Oturan N, Oturan MA. Electrochemical abatement of the antibiotic sulfamethoxazole from water. Chemosphere 2010; 81(5):594-602.
Rosario S, Valverde A, Dolores Gil Garc A, Maria Mart´ınez G, H´ector C, Goicoechea B. “Determination of tetracyclines in surface water by partial least squares using multivariate calibration transfer to correct the effect of solid phase preconcentration in photochemically induced fluorescence signals.” Analytica Chimica Act 2006; 562: 85-93.
Botsoglou N. A, Fletouris D.J. Drugs residues in foods: Pharmacology, Food Safety, and Analysis, Marcel Dekker Inc. New York .2000; P: 52-61.
Elks J, Ganellin C.R . Dictionary of drugs, Chapman and Hall, Pub. London. 1991 ; p:1001-1009.
Reynolds J.E.F, Martindale G. The extra pharmacopoeia, 30th Ed. The Pharmaceutical Press., London.1993; P: 232.
Seifrtov M, Novov L, Linob C, Penab A, Solicha P. An overview of analytical methodologies for the determination of antibiotics in environmental waters. Analytica Chimica Acta 2009; 649: 158-79.
Yu-Chen A. L, Lin C. F, Line J. M, Andy Hong P.K. O3 and O3/H2O2 treatment of sulfonamide and macrolide antibiotics in wastewater. J. of Hazardous Materials 2009; 171: 452-58.
Niina M, Vieno A.B, Tuula Tuhkanen B, Leif K. Analysis of neutral and basic pharmaceuticals in sewage treatment plants and in recipient rivers using solid phase extraction and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry detection. Journal of Chromatography 2006; 1134:101-111.
Virender K.S. Oxidative transformations of environmental pharmaceuticals by Cl2, ClO2, O3, and Fe[VI]: Kinetics assessment. Chemosphere 2008; 73: 1379-86.
Arsene D, Petronela Musteret C, Catrinescu C, Apopei P, Brajoveanu G, Teodosiu C. Combined oxidation and ultrafilteration processes for the removal of priority organic pollutants from wastewaters. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Management 2011; 10: 1967-76.
Kestioslu K, Yonar T, Azbar N. Feasibility of physico-chemical treatment and advanced oxidation processes [AOPs] as a means of pretreatment of olive mill effluent. J. Process Biochemistry 2005; 40, 2409-16.
Xing Z. P, Sun D.Z. Treatment of antibiotic fermentation wastewater by combined polyferric sulfate coagulation, Fenton and sedimentation process. J. of Hazardous Materials 2009; 168: 1264-1268.
Ben W, Qiang Z, Pan X, Chen M. Removal of veterinary antibiotics from sequencing batch reactor [SBR] pretreated swine wastewater by Fenton’s reagent. Water research 2009; 43 (17): 4392-4402.
Aliabadi M, Fazel S, Vahabzadeh F. Processes in Application of Acid Cracking and Fenton Treating Olive Mill Wastewater. Water and wastewater 2006; 17(1): 30-36. (In Persian).
Ting W.P, Lu M.C, Huang Y.H, The reactor design and comparison of Fenton,electro-Fenton and photoelectro-Fenton processes for mineralization of benzene sulfonic acid [BSA]. J. Hazard. Mater 2008; 156(1-3): 421-7.17/
Badawy M.I, Ali M.E.M. Fenton’s peroxidation and coagulation processes for the treatment of combined industrial and domestic wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater 2006; 136(3): 961–66.
Chen X, Chen G, Yue P.L, Separation of pollutants from restaurant wastewater by electrocoagulation, Sep. Purif.
Technol 2000; 19(1-2): 65–76.
Barbusinski K. Fenton reaction-controversy concerning the chemistry. Ecolog. Chem. Eng 2009; 42: 347-58.
Farhadi S, Aminzadeh A. Comparison of COD removal from pharmaceutical wastewater by electrocoagulation,photoelectrocoagulation, peroxi-electrocoagulation and peroxi photoelectrocoagulation processes. Journal of hazardous materials 2012; 35: 219-220.
Dehghani S, Jonidi jafari A, Farzadkia M, Gholami M. Investigation of the efficiency of Fenton’s advanced oxidation
process in sulfadiazine antibiotic removal from aqueous solutions. Arak Medical University Journal 2012; 15 (66): 19-
- چکیده مشاهده شده: 319 بار
- PDF (English) دانلود شده: 164 بار