Optimization of phenanthrene contaminated soil washing using Response Surface Methodology

Farzaneh Gharibzadeh, Roshanak Rezaei Kalantary, Simin Nasseri1, Ali Esrafili, Masoumeh Golshan

206

Abstract

Background and Aims: Soil washing using surfactant is a promising technology for PAHs removal from soil transferring them into liquid phase. The performance of this process is influenced by several factors such as surfactant concentration, washing time, liquid:soil ratio (L/S) and the presence of natural organic matter, which in the present study was totally investigated using the nonionic surfactant Tween 80.
Materials and Methods: Surfactant solution with three various concentrations of 500, 2750, 5000 mg/l, at liquid:soil ratios of 10, 20, 30 v/w (ml/g) containing three concentrations of 0, 10, 20 mg/l humic acid (asNOM) was added to phenanthrene contaminated soil samples. The samples were placed on a shaker for time
interval of 2, 13 and 24 hours, then it was injected to HPLC for phenanthrene concentration analyze. This research was conducted on the basis of central composite design by using response surface method (RSM) in 29 experimental runs.
Results: Maximum removal efficiency (77.35%) was achieved under the experimental conditions of 5000 mg/l surfactant concentration, 30 v/w liquid:soil ratio, absence of humic acid and 24 h washing time. Surfactant concentration with impact value of 82.03% was the most effective parameter in phenanthrene removal. L/S was also the other significant factor (P<0.0001), but humic acid and washing time were, statistically,
insignificant. The interaction between surfactant concentration and L/S was significant too.
Conclusion: Considering the conditions of Iran’s soils containing 3-6 percent organic matter and based on the suggestions of RSM with 95.10% desirability, the optimum conditions for washing high- phenanthrene soil (about 500 mg/kg) with minimum washing time of 2 hours were as 5000 mg/l surfactant concentration, 30 v/w (ml/g) liquid:soil ratio, and 2.1 mg/l humic acid concentration (6.30%).
Key words: phenanthrene, soil washing, surfactant Tween 80, optimization

Full Text:

PDF

References

López-Vizcaíno R, Sáez C, Cañizares P, Rodrigo MA. The use of a combined process of surfactant-aided soil washing and coagulation for PAH-contaminated soils treatment. Separation and Purification Technology 2012; 88(0): 46-51.

Fernández-Luqueño F, Valenzuela-Encinas C, Marsch R, Martínez-Suárez C, Vázquez-Núñez E, Dendooven L. Microbial communities to mitigate contamination of PAHs in soil—possibilities and challenges: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2011; 18(1): 12-30.

Lu X-Y, Zhang T, Fang H. Bacteria-mediated PAH degradation in soil and sediment. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2011; 89(5): 1357-71.

Yang L, Jin M, Tong C, Xie S. Study of dynamic sorption and desorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in silty-clay soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2013; 245(0):77-85.

Gómez J, Alcántara MT, Pazos M, Sanromán MA. Remediation of polluted soil by a two-stage treatment system: Desorption of phenanthrene in soil and electrochemical treatment to recover the extraction agent. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2010; 173(1–3): 794-8.

Aryal M, Liakopoulou-Kyriakides M. Biodegradation and Kinetics of Phenanthrene and Pyrene in the Presence of Nonionic Surfactants by Arthrobacter Strain Sphe3. Water Air Soil Pollut 2013; 224 (2): 1-10.

Alcántara MT, Gómez J, Pazos M, Sanromán MA. Combined treatment of PAHs contaminated soils using the sequence extraction with surfactant–electrochemical degradation. Chemosphere 2008;70(8):1438-44.

Jin D, Jiang X, Jing X, Ou Z. Effects of concentration, head group, and structure of surfactants on the degradation of phenanthrene. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2007;144(1–2): 215-21.

Peng S, Wu W, Chen J. Removal of PAHs with surfactant-enhanced soil washing: Influencing factors and removal effectiveness. Chemosphere 2011; 82(8): 1173-7.

Zhou W, Wang X, Chen C, Zhu L. Enhanced soil washing of phenanthrene by a plant-derived natural biosurfactant, Sapindus saponin. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2013 ;425(0): 122-8.

Fonseca B, Pazos M, Figueiredo H, Tavares T, Sanromán MA. Desorption kinetics of phenanthrene and lead from historically contaminated soil. Chemical Engineering Journal 2011 ;167(1): 84-90.

Cheng KY, Wong JWC. Combined effect of nonionic surfactant Tween 80 and DOM on the behaviors of PAHs in soil–water system. Chemosphere 2006 ;62(11):1907-16.

Yu H, Huang G-h, An C-j, Wei J. Combined effects of DOM extracted from site soil/compost and biosurfactant on the sorption and desorption of PAHs in a soil–water system. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2011; 190(1–3): 883-90.

Conte P, Agretto A, Spaccini R, Piccolo A. Soil remediation: humic acids as natural surfactants in the washings of highly contaminated soils. Environmental Pollution 2005 ;135(3): 515-22.

Tejeda-Agredano M-C, Mayer P, Ortega-Calvo J-J. The effect of humic acids on biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons depends on the exposure regime. Environmental Pollution 2014 ;184(0): 435-42.

Plaza C, Xing B, Fernández JM, Senesi N, Polo A. Binding of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by humic acids formed during composting. Environmental Pollution 2009; 157(1): 257-63./10

Lu M, Yuan D, Li Q, Ouyang T. Application of Response Surface Methodology to Analyze the Effects of Soil/Liquid Ratio, pH, and Incubation Time on the Bioaccessibility of PAHs from Soil in In Vitro Method. Water Air Soil Pollut 2009; 200(1-4): 387-97.

Golshan M, Nasseri S, Farzadkia M, Esrafili A, Rezaei Kalantary R, Karimi Takanlu L. Performance assessment of rhamnolipid MR01biosurfactant and Triton X-100 chemical surfactant in removal of phenanthrene from soil. Iran J Health & Environ 2014; 7: 143-56.

Zhou W, Yang J, Lou L, Zhu L. Solubilization properties of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by saponin, a plant-derived biosurfactant. Environmental Pollution 2011;159(5):1198-204.

Sales PS, de Rossi RH, Fernández MA. Different behaviours in the solubilization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water induced by mixed surfactant solutions. Chemosphere 2011 ;84(11):1700-7.

Zhu L, Zhou W. Partitioning of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to solid-sorbed nonionic surfactants. Environmental Pollution 2008 ;152(1): 130-7.

Mouton J, Mercier G, Blais J-F. Amphoteric Surfactants for PAH and Lead Polluted-Soil Treatment Using Flotation. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 2009 ; 197(1-4): 381-93.

Portet-Koltalo F, Ammami MT, Benamar A, Wang H, Le Derf F, Duclairoir-Poc C. Investigation of the release of PAHs from artificially contaminated sediments using cyclolipopeptidic biosurfactants. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2013; 261(0): 593-601.

Laha S, Tansel B, Ussawarujikulchai A. Surfactant–soil interactions during surfactant-amended remediation of contaminated soils by hydrophobic organic compounds: A review. Journal of Environmental Management 2009; 90(1): 95-100.

An C-j, Huang G-h, Wei J, Yu H. Effect of short-chain organic acids on the enhanced desorption of phenanthrene by rhamnolipid biosurfactant in soil–water environment. Water Research 2011; 45(17): 5501-10.

Sun Y, Ji L, Wang W, Wang X, Wu J, Li H. Simultaneous Removal of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Copper from Soils using Ethyl Lactate-Amended EDDS Solution. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 2009 (0047-2425):1591-7.

REZAEI KALANTARY R, BADKOUBI A, MOHSENI-BANDPI A, ESRAFILI A, JORFI S, DEHGHANIFARD E. Modification of PAHs Biodegradation with Humic Compounds. Soil and Sediment Contamination. 2013; 22( 2): 185-98.

Lima TS, Procópio L, Brandão F, Carvalho AX, Tótola M, Borges A. Simultaneous phenanthrene and cadmium removal from contaminated soil by a ligand/biosurfactant solution. Biodegradation. 2011 ; 22(5):

-15.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.