Study of Precautionary Principle in the Light of Biosafety Act

Janet Elizabeth Blake, Komail Sadeghi

Abstract


0

Background and Aim: The Cartagena Protocol on biosafety has been formulated based on the precautionary principle. Following Iran's accession to the Protocol, the Iran Biosafety Act was adopted to establish regulations in this field. In spite of the necessity of complying of this law with the precautionary principle, its adherence to this principle is in doubt. Therefore, the present study seeks to investigate the extent of its compliance with the precautionary principle by analyzing this legal document.

Materials and Methods: In this analytical study, while studying the literature and published articles, the document of biosafety law was analyzed and criticized from different aspects.

Findings: In this law, the ethical principle of precaution and its scope and how it is enforced has not been mentioned and only implicitly it has been mentioned for risk assessment and management by referring to the Cartagena Protocol. In the area of public participation, there are also no requirements and there are many ambiguities regarding compliance with the precautionary principle regarding civil and criminal liability.

Conclusion: The biosafety law has failed to enforce the precautionary principle and is in contradiction with the aforementioned approach. The main reason for this matter may be the lack of definition and scope of this principle in view of the socio-economic conditions of the country. Amendments of the law are recommended in accordance with the precautionary principle.

 

Please cite this article as: Blake JE, Sadeghi K. Study of Precautionary Principle in the Light of Biosafety Act. Bioethics Journal 2019; 9(32): 87-100.


Keywords


Biosafety; Principle of Precaution; Cartagena Protocol; Risk Assessment, Iran

Full Text:

PDF

0

References


Salehi Jouzani GH, Tohidfar M, Sadeghi A. Biosafety Aspects of Genetically Modified Plants. Karaj: Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran; 2010. [Persian]

Omidi M, Samiei Farahani M. Future Biotechnology and Biosafety. Journal of Strategic Researches in Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources 2018; 3(1): 51-62. [Persian]

Royal G. The Benefits of Agricultural Biotechnology. 2006. Internet Website. Available at: http://www.ezinearticles.com/?The-Benefits-Of-Agricultural Biotechnology&id=244502.

Rasouli D, Solouki M. The Role of Biotechnology in Human Life and the Callenges ahea. Hamedan: The 2nd National Conference on Sustainable Agriculture and Sustainable Environment; 2013. Available at: https://www.civilica.com/Paper-SADHE02-SADHE02_306. [Persian]

Seyyed Tabatabaei BE. The Role of Biotechnology in Agriculture and Environmental Protection. Journal of Strategic Researches in Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources 2018; 3(1): 77-84. [Persian]

Abdi S, Orfi Yeganeh S. Application of active sludge method in sewage and waste treatment. Hamedan: First National Conference on Environmental Conservation and Environmental Planning; 2013. Available at: https://www.civilica.com/Paper-NATURE01-NATURE01_586= [Persian]

Kasraei P. Gmo's. Beneficial or Harmful. Journal of Agriculture and Sustainable Development 2009; 25: 24-27. [Persian]

Godheja J. Impact of GMO's on Environment and Human Health. Journal of Recent Research in Science and Technology 2013; 5(5): 26-29.

Key S, K-C Ma J, MW Drake P. Genetically Modified Plants and Human Health. Journal of Royal Society of Medicine 2008; 101(6): 290-298.

Ghareyazi B, Mohsenpour M, Kahak S. Genetic Engineering and Food Security. Journal of Strategic Researches in Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources 2018; 3(2): 195-208. [Persian]

Novaglaze E. The Precautionary Principle as an Indication of the Mentality and Needs of Post-Modern Human Beings. The Journal of Knowledge 2007; 8(61): 121-146. [Persian]

Puttagunta PS. The precautionary principle in the regulation of genetically modified organisms. Journal of Health Law Review 2001; 9(2): 27-34.

Hayati AA. Concept of the "Precautionary Principle" and its Place in Civil Responsibility. Journal of Islamic Law Research 2014; 15(40): 185-206. [Persian]

Lotfi A. The Principle of the incumbency of Preventing Contingent Damage. Journal of Judicial Law Views Quarterly (Law Views) 2012; 17(59): 205-234. [Persian]

Ramezani Ghavamabadi MH. A Comparative Study of "Precautionary Principle" in Opinions and Decisions of Internationals Tribunals. Journal of Public Law 2013; 15(40): 141-163. [Persian]

Ingeborg A, Traavik T. The Precautionary Principle: Scientific Uncertainty and Research in the Context of Omitted GMO Use and Release. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Ethics 2002; 15(1): 73-88.

Pourhashemi SA, Zare A. Implementation of the Precautionary Principle in International Environmental Law. Journal of Law and Politics 2015; 11(1): 117-127. [Persian]

Sadeghi K. The Legal Dimensions of Biosafety: Meet Iran as a Case Study. Thesis submitted for degree of M.A in Environmental Law. Tehran.Iran : Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University; 2016.

Lopez VJ, El-kawy O, Catacora Vargas G. Socio Economic Consideration in GMO Decision-Making. Penang: International Agreement in Context; Third World Network; 2014.

McClengahan TH, Cooper K, Muldoon P, Vanderlinden L, Abelsohn A, Khatter K, et al. Environmental Standard Setting and Children's Health in Canada: Injecting Precaution in Risk Assessment. Journal of Environmental Law and Practice 2003; 2(12): 141-279.

Spok A, Hofer H, Lehner P, Valenta R, Strin S, Gaugitsch H. Risk Assessment of GMO Products in the European Union. Vien: Umweltbundesamt GmBH; 2005.

Rifkin J. Newbie Fear. West Touring Journal 2006; 4(34): 141-145. [Persian]

Jensen K, Gamborg CH, Madsen K, Jorgensen RB, Kraus M, Folker AP, et al. Making the EU Risk Window Transparent: The Normative Foundations of the Environmental Risk Assessment of GMOs. Journal of Environmental Biosafety Research 2003; 2(3): 161-171.

Prakash D, Verma S, Bhatia R, Tiwary BN. Risks and Precautions of Genetically Modified Organisms. ISRN Ecology; 2011. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5402/2011/369573

Kazemi Najafabadi A, Skandarian H. Legislative Obligations of Member States under Cartagena Protocol and the Extent to which the Islamic Republic of Iran has Adhered to such Commitments. Journal of Public Law 2014; 16(44): 129-148. [Persian]

Glover D. Public Participation in National Biotechnology Policy and Biosafety Regulation. Working Paper series, Brighton, Sussex, UK: Institute of Development Studies Working Paper; 2003.

Abdollahi M. Iran's Biosafety Act: The imbalance between the rights of producers and consumers of Transgenic products, Paper Presented at: Congress of Genetics, Law, Ethics, Psychology. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University; 2010.

Cordonier S, Marie Claire P, Welch F, Frison CH. Legal Aspects of Implementing the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014.

Züghart W, Raps A, Gabrielle Wust-Saucy A, Dolezel M, Eckerstorfer M. Monitoring of Gentically Modified Organisms. Vienna: Umweltbundesamt GmbH; 2011.

Esmaeilzadeh N. A decade of effort to develop safe biotechnology. Journal of Biosafety 2013; 6(1): 31-40. [Persian]

Soleimani E. Review of the National Biosafety Act and the Challenges for its Implementation, Report. Tehran: Islamic Parlimant Research Center; 2014. Available at: https://www.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/ 887091. [Persian]

Bahreini SH, Imeni F. The Role of NGOs in Achieving Public Participation in Protecting the Environment in Iran. Journal of Environmental Studies 2000; 26(26): 35-49. [Persian]

Fahimi A, Mashhadi A. Shi'ah Jurisprudenc and Evolution in the Fundaments of Environmental Civil Liability. Journal of Private Law Studies 2011; 41(1): 313-326. [Persian]

Zayed Hayajneh A. Civil Liability for Environmental Damage: A Comparative Study between Jordanian and English Legal Systems. Thesis submitted for degree of Doctor in Philosophy in Law, Newcastle Law School. Newcastle, UK: University of Newcastle Upon Tyne; 2004.

Bigdeli S, Badi Sanaye Esfahani A. The Civil Liability’s Basis of Genetically Modified Foods (Transgenic) with Comparative Study in Iran’s Law and International Instruments. Joural of Comparative Law Review 2014; 5(2): 287-316. [Persian]

Ebrahimi Larimi S N. Liability for producing defective goods and protecting consumers (legal analysis in the world's three largest legal systems). Journal of Law and Politics 2007, 5: 13-54. [Persian]

Mohajer M, Safaei H. Mahdavi Damghani A. Ethical and legal considerations for application of transgenic products: a critical review of national Iranian biosafety law. Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology 2011; 6(1): 35-42. [Persian]

Samavati Pirouz A. Analysis and Criticism of Iranian Biosafety Act with a Focus on Approaches of Criminal Law. Medical Law 2014; 4(12): 149-167. [Persian]

Ardebili MA. General Criminal Law. Tehran: Mizan Publication; 2006. [Persian]

Shambiati H. General Criminal Law. Tehran: Majd Publication; 2013. [Persian]




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22037/bj.v9i32.28051

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License CC BY-NC 4.0. Copyright © 2016 Bioethics Journal (Quarterly). All rights reserved.  All credits and honors to PKP for their OJS.

For Author | Online Submission | About Contact