• Logo
  • SBMUJournals

The Accuracy of Urinalysis in Predicting Intra-Abdominal Injury Following Blunt Traumas

Anita Sabzghabaei, Majid Shojaee, Saeed Safari, Hamid Reza Hatamabadi, Reza Shirvani
401

Views


Abstract

Introduction: In cases of blunt abdominal traumas, predicting the possible intra-abdominal injuries is still a challenge for the physicians involved with these patients. Therefore, this study was designed, to evaluate the accuracy of urinalysis in predicting intra-abdominal injuries. Methods: Patients aged 15 to 65 years with blunt abdominal trauma who were admitted to emergency departments were enrolled. Abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) scan with intravenous contrast and urinalysis were requested for all the included patients. Demographic data, trauma mechanism, the results of urinalysis, and the results of abdominopelvic CT scan were gathered. Finally, the correlation between the results of abdominopelvic CT scan, and urinalysis was determined. Urinalysis was considered positive in case of at least one positive value in gross appearance, blood in dipstick, or red blood cell count. Results: 325 patients with blunt abdominal trauma were admitted to the emergency departments (83% male with the mean age of 32.63±17.48 years). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of urinalysis, were 77.9% (95% CI: 69.6-84.4), 58.5% (95% CI: 51.2-65.5), 56% (95% CI: 48.5-63.3), 79.6% (95% CI: 71.8-85.7), 1.27% (95% CI: 1.30-1.57), and 0.25% (95% CI: 0.18-0.36), respectively. Conclusion: The diagnostic value of urinalysis in prediction of blunt traumatic intra-abdominal injuries is low and it seems that it should be considered as an adjuvant diagnostic tool, in conjunction with other sources such as clinical findings and imaging.

Keywords

Urinalysis; abdominal injuries; abdomen; tomography, X-Ray computed

References

Tan WW, Chen CC, Chiang HJ. The value and role of computed tomography in blunt injury of the abdomen. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 1991;48(2):116-20.

Feliciano D. Diagnostic modalities in abdominal trauma. Peritoneal lavage, ultrasonography, computed tomography scanning, and arteriography. Surg Clin North Am. 1991;71(2):241-56.

Schurink G, Bode P, Van Luijt P, Van Vugt A. The value of physical examination in the diagnosis of patients with blunt abdominal trauma: a retrospective study. Injury. 1997;28(4):261-5.

Thal E, Meyer D. The evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma: computed tomography scan, lavage, or sonography? Adv Surg. 1991;24:201-28.

Wilson CB, Vidrine Jr A, Rives JD. Unrecognized abdominal trauma in patients with head injuries. Ann Surg. 1965;161(4):608-13.

Wening J. Evaluation of ultrasound, lavage, and computed tomography in blunt abdominal trauma. Surg Endosc. 1989;3(3):152-8.

Willmann JrK, Roos JE, Platz A, et al. Multidetector CT: detection of active hemorrhage in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179(2):437-44.

Isaacman DJ, Scarfone RJ, Kost SI, et al. Utility of routine laboratory testing for detecting intra-abdominal injury in the pediatric trauma patient. Pediatrics. 1993;92(5):691-4.

Cotton BA, Beckert BW, Smith MK, Burd RS. The utility of clinical and laboratory data for predicting intraabdominal injury among children. J Trauma. 2004;56(5):1068-75.

Köksal Ö, Çevik ŞE, AYDIN ŞA, Özdemir F. Analysis of the necessity of routine tests in trauma patients in the emergency department. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2012;18(1):23-30.

Marx J, Hockberger R, Walls R. Rosen's Emergency Medicine-Concepts and Clinical Practice: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013. p. 68.

Streck Jr CJ, Jewett BM, Wahlquist AH, Gutierrez PS, Russell WS. Evaluation for intra-abdominal injury in children following blunt torso trauma. Can we reduce unnecessary abdominal CT by utilizing a clinical prediction model? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(2).

Raz O, Haifler M, Copel L, et al. Use of adult criteria for slice imaging may limit unnecessary radiation exposure in children presenting with hematuria and blunt abdominal trauma. Urology. 2011;77(1):187-90.

Capraro AJ, Mooney D, Waltzman ML. The use of routine laboratory studies as screening tools in pediatric abdominal trauma. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006;22(7):480-4.

Gorchynski J, Dean K, Anderson CL. Analysis of urobilinogen and urine bilirubin for intra-abdominal injury in Blunt trauma patients. West J Emerg Med. 2009;10(2):85.

Keller MS, Coln CE, Trimble JA, Green MC, Weber TR. The utility of routine trauma laboratories in pediatric trauma resuscitations. Am J Surg. 2004;188(6):671-8.

Olthof DC, Joosse P, van der Vlies CH, de Reijke TM, Goslings JC. Routine urinalysis in patients with a blunt abdominal trauma mechanism is not valuable to detect urogenital injury. Emerg Med J. 2013:emermed-2013-202651.

Thorp AW, Young TP, Brown L. Test characteristics of urinalysis to predict urologic injury in children. West J Emerg Med. 2011;12(2):168.

Shojaee M, Faridaalaee G, Yousefifard M, et al. New scoring system for intra-abdominal injury diagnosis after blunt trauma. Chin J Traumatol. 2014;17(1):19-24.

Shojaee M, Faridaalaee G, Sabzghabaei A, et al. Sonographic detection of abdominal free fluid: Emergency residents vs radiology residents. Trauma Mon. 2013;17(4):377.

Alavi-Moghaddam M, Safari S, Najafi I, Hosseini M. Accuracy of urine dipstick in the detection of patients at risk for crush-induced rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney injury. Eur J Emerg Med. 2012;19(5):329-32.

Wessel L, Scholz S, Jester I, et al. Management of kidney injuries in children with blunt abdominal trauma. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35(9):1326-30.

Stein JP, Freeman JA, Kaji DM, Esrig D, Eastham J, Ehardy B. Blunt renal trauma 1n the pediatricpopulation: Indications for radiographic evaluation. Urology. 1994;44(3):406-10.

KENNEDY TJ, McCONNELL JD, THAL ER. Urine dipstick vs. microscopic urinalysis in the evaluation of abdominal trauma. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 1988;28(5):615-7.

Perez-Brayfield MR, Gatti JM, Smith EA, et al. Blunt traumatic hematuria in children. Is a simplified algorithm justified? J Urol. 2002;167(6):2543-6.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22037/emergency.v4i1.8853

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.