• Logo
  • SBMUJournals

Potential Child Abuse Screening in Emergency Department; a Diagnostic Accuracy Study

Hossein Dinpanah, Abazar Akbarzadeh Pasha, Mojtaba Sanji
PDF

Abstract

Introduction: Designing a tool that can differentiate those at risk of child abuse with great diagnostic accuracy
is of great interest. The present study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Escape instrument
in triage of at risk cases of child abuse presenting to emergency department (ED). Methods: The present diagnostic
accuracy study performed on 6120 of the children under 16 years old presented to ED during 3 years,
using convenience sampling. Confirmation by the child abuse team (pediatrician, a socialworker, and a forensic
physician) was considered as the gold standard. Screening performance characteristics of Escape were calculated
using STATA 21. Results: 6120 children with the mean age of 2.19 § 1.12 years were screened (52.7% girls).
137 children were suspected victims of child abuse. Based on child abuse team opinion, 35 (0.5%) children were
confirmed victims of child abuse. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio and positive and
negative predictive values of this test with 95% CI were 100 (87.6 – 100), 98.3 (97.9 – 98.6), 25.5 (18.6 – 33.8), 100
(99.9 – 100), 0.34 (0.25 – 0.46), and 0 (0 – NAN), respectively. Area under the ROC curve was 99.2 (98.9 – 99.4).
Conclusion: It seems that Escape is a suitable screening instrument for detection of at risk cases of child abuse
presenting to ED. Based on the results of the present study, the accuracy of this screening tool is 99.2%, which is
in the excellent range.

Keywords

Child abuse; diagnosis; emergency service, hospital; risk assessment; decision support techniques

References

http://www.who.int/topics/child_abuse/en/. 2007.

Hobbs CJ, Hanks HG, Wynne JM. Child abuse and neglect:

a clinician’s handbook: Elsevier Health Sciences;

Kemp A. Abuse in the family: An introduction:

Wadsworth Publishing Company; 1998.

Ludwig S, Kornberg AE. Child abuse: a medical reference:

Churchill Livingstone New York; 1992.

McMillan JA, Feigin RD, DeAngelis C, Jones MD. Oski’s

pediatrics: principles & practice: Lippincott Williams &

Wilkins; 2006.

Sayyari AA, Bagheri Yazdi SA, Jalili B, Khoshabi K, Shahmohammadi

D, Imanzadeh F, et al. Physical childabuse

in Tehran, Iran. Journal of rehabilitation (UWRS).

;6(6-7):7-13.

Farhoudian A, Izadian ES, Goodarzi RR, Sharifi V, Mohammadi

M-R, Nejatisafa A-A, et al. Iran’s Contribution

to Child and Adolescent Mental HealthResearch (1973–

: A Scientometric Analysis. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry.

;1(3):93-7.

Louwers EC, Affourtit MJ, Moll HA, de Koning HJ, Korfage

IJ. Screening for child abuse at emergency departments:

a systematic review. Archives of disease in childhood.

;95(3):214-8.

Woodman J, Pitt M, Wentz R, Taylor B, Hodes D, Gilbert

R. Performance of screening tests for child physical abuse

in accident and emergency departments. 2008.

Raffle AE, Gray JAM. Screening: evidence and practice:

Oxford University Press; 2007.

Louwers EC, Korfage IJ, Affourtit MJ, Ruige M, van den

Elzen AP, de Koning HJ, et al. Accuracy of a screening instrument

to identify potential child abuse in emergency

departments. Child abuse & neglect. 2014;38(7):1275-81.

Butchart A, Harvey AP, Mian M, Furniss T. Preventing

child maltreatment: a guide to taking action and generating

evidence. 2006.

Hampton RL, Newberger EH. Child abuse incidence and

reporting by hospitals: significance of severity, class, and

race. American Journal of Public Health. 1985;75(1):56-

Hussey JM, Chang JJ, Kotch JB. Child maltreatment in the

United States: prevalence, risk factors, and adolescenthealth consequences. Pediatrics. 2006;118(3):933-42.

Benger JR, Pearce AV. Quality improvement report: Simple

intervention to improve detection of child abuse in

emergency departments. BMJ: British Medical Journal.

:780-2.

Chang DC, Knight V, Ziegfeld S, Haider A, Warfield

D, Paidas C. The tip of the iceberg for child abuse:

the critical roles of the pediatric trauma service and

its registry. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery.

;57(6):1189-98.

Holter JC, Friedman SB. Child abuse: early case finding in

the emergency department. Pediatrics. 1968;42(1):128-

Kempe CH, Silverman FN, Steele BF, Droegemueller

W, Silver HK. The battered-child syndrome. Jama.

;251(24):3288-94.

Pless IB, Sibald A, Smith MA, Russell M. A reappraisal of

the frequency of child abuse seen in pediatric emergency

rooms. Child abuse & neglect. 1987;11(2):193-200.

Louwers EC, Korfage IJ, AffourtitMJ, Scheewe DJ, Van De

Merwe MH, Vooijs-Moulaert A-FS, et al. Effects of systematic

screening and detection of child abuse in emergency

departments. Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):457-64.

Bleeker G, Vet NJ, Haumann TJ, van Wijk IJ, Gemke

RJ. [Increase in the number of reported cases of child

abuse following adoption of a structured approach in

the VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, in the period

-2004]. Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.

;149(29):1620-4.

Hosseinkhani Z, Nedjat S, Majdzadeh R, Mahram M,

Aflatooni A. Design of the child abuse Questionnaire in

Iran. Journal of School of Public Health and Institute of

Public Health Research. 2014;11(3):29-38.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/emergency.v5i1.12396

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.